Anyone Support Roger Stone going to prison for 10 years?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The best the lying FBI could do was entrap a socially retarded guy for harmless lying while sporting a life size tattoo of Richard Nixon on his back. This is far cry from getting Trump for being a agent of the USSR.

 

[DGS49]

Keep in mind, this little kerfuffle occurs AT THE SAME TIME AS Leftists throughout the country are campaigning for NON-PRISON sentences for non-violent offenders.

And these people are the VERY SAME ONES who are shrieking at the top of their voices about Trump's statement of outrage over a sentencing recommendation that would have this first-time non-violent offender, whose "crime" resulted in NOTHING WHATSOEVER going to the slammer for TEN YEARS!

You couldn't make this up.

 

[Oddball]

no

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Hell no

The right thing to do is call a mistrial and he can even be tried again..the government has that option in this instance ...simple right
The fucking judge is a bully with an agenda to

 

[MisterBeale]

Absolutely Not.

If Hillary doesn't go to jail for deleting tens of thousands of messages under congressional subpoena? I don't see why Stone should go to prison for a little equivocating.

He should have just taken the fifth instead of being uncooperative.

I think destruction of evidence on Hillary's part is a lot more serious, but b/c the Deep State and corporate media believe her fairy tales about intent, we have to let her walk?

Bullshit. We know what's what.

She is covering up a crime, and Stone coordinated with Assange. Big Deal.

Since Assange is not a Russian agent, it makes no difference. He just hates HRC because she is a war criminal, and is the person directly responsible for the deaths of many good American intelligence agents.


. . . but she is your typical emotional leftist woman, she needs someone to blame and to pay b/c she lost.



. . . and THAT is the score.

 

[MisterBeale]

Hell no

The right thing to do is call a mistrial and he can even be tried again..the government has that option in this instance ...simple right
The fucking judge is a bully with an agenda to

Dude.

Don't be obtuse man. He did the deed. He coordinated with Assange. Assange hated Hillary, and admitted it on many an occasion. Everyone knows how close Trump and Stone had always been. Stone was his point man on the outside.

. .. But all of this assumes that the lies in the Mueller report are true.


They aren't. They are all just best guesses. This is why, when Stone asked for the proof of the assertion that it was a "hack," and not a "leak," be admitted, she would not let that be entered. There would be no PROOF of that, it was to be an AXIOM of the trial.

It is obvious, b/c the paradigm of reality on the American consciousness must be defended, even if that means the whole premise on which he was convicted, or upon which the President must conduct his administration, is based wholly upon a lie.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

He coordinated with Assange. .

he was convicted for that?

 

[two_iron]

Stone should walk.

The Bag Lady should get 400 years.

Sorry for being Mr. Obvious.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Stone should walk.

The Bag Lady should get 400 years.

Sorry for being Mr. Obvious.

gee this is no fun!! Are there no liberals on this site???

 

[candycorn]

I say 20

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I say 20

so???????????????????????????

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I say 20

you do??????? Yours is the most intelligent liberal comment yet!!

 

[MisterBeale]

He coordinated with Assange. .

he was convicted for that?

That was basically it. The premise is that Assange is a Russian agent at the point. Most folks have no clue what is happening to Assange, right now, this month, as we speak. Yet he did no wrong.

So Stone, knowing that this whole reality is all based on a lie?

But he knew that the ground rules were fixed, so what was there to do, but lie? (Or take the fifth.) It was all very Kafkaesque.

Lying about the connections he had to Assange, b/c the court and the security state made false assumption about Assange which could be deadly dangerous for anyone now exposed as having connection to him.

Or through to him. Through other journalists, radio personalities etc.


. . . but Assange and he were working together, even if the FBI could never prove it conclusively. Even the most avowed Trump supporter, if they were paying attention, watching any of the INFOWARS or other underground YouTube channels he was disseminating info on, know he was in contact with Assange. Shit, most folks that were paying attention to Trump's campaign probably know more than the half-witted, partisan as shit, echo chamber liberal FBI/CIA on a mission to destroy folks for that Hillary organization.

Bill Binny told everyone it was a leak and not a hack, and all you had to do is look at the stake holders interests behind the folks that did the forensic analysis, to know that those who constructed the story were not impartial. Perhaps Bill Binny wasn't either, but then, his story doesn't rest on locking folks up and throwing away the key. Nor does it rely on denying US government workers a look at the evidence.

It was pretty obvious what was going on.

Of course Stone knew that Wikileaks was dropping stuff against Hillary, he was being tipped.

Assange even told folks that Russia was not the source. All the spooks here ever needed to do to get the full truth, is go on over to Britain and interview him while he clings to life, before he dies, not like he is going anywhere . . . but they don't give a damn about the truth. They already know it. They aren't in the business of truth.

They are in the business of manufacturing reality and outrage.

 

[MisterBeale]

I say 20

20 thousand dollars in restitution for all the pain and suffering the FBI and federal government have caused Mr. Stone?

My, you are a generous person Candy.

How nice of you.

 

[skye]

No way!!!

there is no way that I support Roger Stone going to prison at all!

 

[initforme]

So he is not guilty of anything correct? Then he should be free to go. 7 years is excessive. I do view him as a complete sleezeball and for good reason but 7 years is excessive. I say force him to work for 5 bucks an hour and force him to live on it although it's hard to know if he survive actually working a job.

 

[Crepitus]

The best the lying FBI could do was entrap a socially retarded guy for harmless lying while sporting a life size tattoo of Richard Nixon on his back. This is far cry from getting Trump for being a agent of the USSR.

That is what tRump would like you to believe. The reality is somewhat different.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. The reality is somewhat different.

and let me guess, as a typical liberal, you are afraid to tell us what the realty is?

 

[Crepitus]

Stone should walk.

The Bag Lady should get 400 years.

Sorry for being Mr. Obvious.

gee this is no fun!! Are there no liberals on this site???

 

[MisterBeale]

So he is not guilty of anything correct? Then he should be free to go. 7 years is excessive. I do view him as a complete sleezeball and for good reason but 7 years is excessive. I say force him to work for 5 bucks an hour and force him to live on it although it's hard to know if he survive actually working a job.

Wrong.

He IS guilty of colluding with Assange to help Trump win the election.

The Deep State claims Assange is a Russian Agent. . . .

. . . . but the government doesn't have to prove that.


When Stone's representation asked the Judge and government why?

From the Judge at Stone's Trial?