Anti-PC people making a mistake on the Duck Dynasty story

[deltex1]

All societies have behaviors that they find offensive. Offensive speech has always had consequences....always will

Obabble's lies are offensive.....waiting on the consequences.

He saw the consequences in 2012

A tribute to your stupidity....and others as well

 

[NYcarbineer]

It not a freedom of speech issue. That is a political distnction. It is however something that illuminates the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition. They will always believe they are the smartest ones in the room and anyone that is not in lock step agreement on every issue are demented, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, right wing hey seed rubes.

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

 

[deltex1]

Some sage advice to Conservatives....

When speaking about Homosexuality, bringing up bestiality and pedophilia will get you in trouble every time.......Don't do it


I agree...homosexuality is abnormal enough in its own right.

Jim Crow was a dark period in our history. Lynching, bombing, terrorism are not something to be nostalgic for.......Don't do it

It was almost as bad as the hip hop era.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the Right genuinely opposes boycotts and other citizen actions against media outlets and individuals in the media,

let them prove it by calling on their own advocacy groups to stand down.

Can you name ONE conservative of any significance who's done that???

 

[Stephanie]

It not a freedom of speech issue. That is a political distnction. It is however something that illuminates the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition. They will always believe they are the smartest ones in the room and anyone that is not in lock step agreement on every issue are demented, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, right wing hey seed rubes.

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

Wrong, People are criticizing A&E and Glaad, etc
why must you on the left/liberals make up stuff and lie?
And you want to see epileptic fits, go through the threads on here about this family...the liberal intolerance and hate shines bright

 

[Mac1958]

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

Yet another beautiful example of the point of the thread.

Pretending that (a) this story is happening in a vacuum, that it's not a continuation of the PC strategy, and (2) ignoring the fact that the PC Police want to do far more than just "criticize".

More great stuff. I wonder how many examples of this will pop up on this thread.

.

 

[rightwinger]

Obabble's lies are offensive.....waiting on the consequences.

He saw the consequences in 2012

A tribute to your stupidity....and others as well

Minority claims the majority is stupid

Last vestige of a loser

 

[FJO]

The leftwingers regularly and with great frequency refer to conservatives as "knuckle-draggers" as in gorilla, ape or baboon, thereby equating and conflating them to beasts.

What's worse and more offensive? Accused of being an animal or accused of making love to an animal?

 

[rightwinger]

It not a freedom of speech issue. That is a political distnction. It is however something that illuminates the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition. They will always believe they are the smartest ones in the room and anyone that is not in lock step agreement on every issue are demented, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, right wing hey seed rubes.

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

 

[OODA_Loop]

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

They are both paraphilia.

 

[Katzndogz]

It not a freedom of speech issue. That is a political distnction. It is however something that illuminates the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition. They will always believe they are the smartest ones in the room and anyone that is not in lock step agreement on every issue are demented, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, right wing hey seed rubes.

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

Only if you are in a position to be fired. Only if being fired means something to you. As one television executive said “I don’t’ think he gives a flying fuck whether or not [A&E] agrees with him. I don’t think there’s any fear in this guy.” In order to instill fear of being fired, the person has to care whether they are fired or not.

 

[SwimExpert]

It should be about the hypocritical, paranoid, intolerant narcissism of the PC Police, and how they want to punish and intimidate people and businesses.

Haven't the bible thumping right been happy to do this in times past?

 

[occupied]

It not a freedom of speech issue. That is a political distnction. It is however something that illuminates the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition. They will always believe they are the smartest ones in the room and anyone that is not in lock step agreement on every issue are demented, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, right wing hey seed rubes.

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

Back in biblical times uttering the name of the lord would get you stoned to death. Given half a chance many of these religious assholes would jump at a chance to make all sorts of speech punishable by law.

 

[Mac1958]

It should be about the hypocritical, paranoid, intolerant narcissism of the PC Police, and how they want to punish and intimidate people and businesses.

Haven't the bible thumping right been happy to do this in times past?

Yep.

And your attempt at deflection is noted.

.

 

[rightwinger]

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

Only if you are in a position to be fired. Only if being fired means something to you. As one television executive said “I don’t’ think he gives a flying fuck whether or not [A&E] agrees with him. I don’t think there’s any fear in this guy.” In order to instill fear of being fired, the person has to care whether they are fired or not.

Conservatives seem to care

That is why we have so many threads here started by the right whining about poor Phil

 

[LoneLaugher]

I sure hope Mac is right and the PC police are being shown the door. If it means that he will have to find something else to whine about, that is.

 

[Katzndogz]

And the rightwingers who are throwing a massive epileptic fit over the fact that some clown is getting criticized for saying something stupid...

...what about their standards?

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

Back in biblical times uttering the name of the lord would get you stoned to death. Given half a chance many of these religious assholes would jump at a chance to make all sorts of speech punishable by law.

Given half a chance the gay gestapo would do the same to anyone who doesn't agree with them.

 

[Katzndogz]

There has always been PC
Back in the 40s, saying anything pro Germany or Japan got you fired
Back in the 50s, saying anything remotely favoring communism got you fired
Back in the 60s-70s, saying the n-word would get you fired

Now, equating homosexuals with bestiality will get you fired

Only if you are in a position to be fired. Only if being fired means something to you. As one television executive said “I don’t’ think he gives a flying fuck whether or not [A&E] agrees with him. I don’t think there’s any fear in this guy.” In order to instill fear of being fired, the person has to care whether they are fired or not.

Conservatives seem to care

That is why we have so many threads here started by the right whining about poor Phil

It's the left trying to justify what happened to poor Phil who doesn't give a flying fuck about what the left thinks.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

.

Those of us who have had enough BS from the PC Police are making it easy for them to wiggle out of this story on the hairy southern duck guy.

By bringing up -- or worse, letting them move the conversation to -- freedom of speech or religion or television contracts or the Constitution, you're giving them the opportunity to avoid the real issue (at least in my humble opinion): Their hypocritical, narcissistic intolerance.

Plus, this issue doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's just the latest in a long, long line of examples of their bigotry and intolerance. Holy crap, some of the things I've seen them say here about people who live in that area, wow.

The pushback is absolutely great and terribly overdue. They've jumped the shark with their race-baiting, language-manipulating, phony self esteem-building, forced inclusion silliness and it's clear that the pushback has begun. Yay!

This isn't (or shouldn't be) about the 1st Amendment or television contracts or religion. It should be about the hypocritical, paranoid, intolerant narcissism of the PC Police, and how they want to punish and intimidate people and businesses.

.

The Phil-side shoulda controlled the debate better by addressing it as a Bible paraphrase issue only. Since Phil did in fact paraphrase Corinthians, coulda won the whole debate simply by saying, "Loook, this is what the Bible says. If you don't agree fine, but if that's the case we're not inclined to argue the point with you beause we certainly don't want to ram our religion down anyone's throat." Even if Christians do in fact like ramming their religion down people's throats, it would have won the debate outright by limiting the frame of reference.

If you don't like where someone tries taking a debate, don't accept the premise of their question or point. Reply only to your own arguement. No such thing as a one person debate.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Those of us who have had enough BS from the PC Police are making it easy for them to wiggle out of this story on the hairy southern duck guy.

By bringing up -- or worse, letting them move the conversation to -- freedom of speech or religion or television contracts or the Constitution, you're giving them the opportunity to avoid the real issue (at least in my humble opinion): Their hypocritical, narcissistic intolerance.

Plus, this issue doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's just the latest in a long, long line of examples of their bigotry and intolerance. Holy crap, some of the things I've seen them say here about people who live in that area, wow.

The pushback is absolutely great and terribly overdue. They've jumped the shark with their race-baiting, language-manipulating, phony self esteem-building, forced inclusion silliness and it's clear that the pushback has begun. Yay!

This isn't (or shouldn't be) about the 1st Amendment or television contracts or religion. It should be about the hypocritical, paranoid, intolerant narcissism of the PC Police, and how they want to punish and intimidate people and businesses.

.

The Phil-side shoulda controlled the debate better by addressing it as a Bible paraphrase issue only. Since Phil did in fact paraphrase Corinthians, coulda won the whole debate simply by saying, "Loook, this is what the Bible says. If you don't agree fine, but if that's the case we're not inclined to argue the point with you beause we certainly don't want to ram our religion down anyone's throat." Even if Christians do in fact like ramming their religion down people's throats, it would have won the debate outright by limiting the frame of reference.

If you don't like where someone tries taking a debate, don't accept the premise of their question or point. Reply only to your own arguement. No such thing as a one person debate.

Yup, and then Palin and others handed the PC Police a gift with their "freedom of speech" argument, and on and on.

Gotta stay focused.

.