Samson
Póg Mo Thóin
:[
Again, and sadly, it all comes down to the allmighty dollar
Bullshit
What a great comment Samson.
I like to be succinct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
:[
Again, and sadly, it all comes down to the allmighty dollar
Bullshit
What a great comment Samson.
All children can succeed if given the chance, not matter where they come from.
I'm gonna go pull on my waders to walk around in your BS today.
The ol' "All Children Can Succeed" Chant?
No, let's face it, not all children can "succeed." We need to take a realistic approach. Offer free education until Grade 9. Then cut them loose to "succeed" on their own.
That would change with a voucher program. It's a nice idea on the surface, but it's really just subsidized private education that would end up changing private ed into something similar to our public ed system we have now. Unintended consequences and all that.
No.
Private schools, if they were endangered with what you are imagining, which is unlikely, would simply raise the price of tuition beyond the reach of voucher holders.
That would change with a voucher program. It's a nice idea on the surface, but it's really just subsidized private education that would end up changing private ed into something similar to our public ed system we have now. Unintended consequences and all that.
No.
Private schools, if they were endangered with what you are imagining, which is unlikely, would simply raise the price of tuition beyond the reach of voucher holders.
That would change with a voucher program. It's a nice idea on the surface, but it's really just subsidized private education that would end up changing private ed into something similar to our public ed system we have now. Unintended consequences and all that.
No.
Private schools, if they were endangered with what you are imagining, which is unlikely, would simply raise the price of tuition beyond the reach of voucher holders.
Yep. The voucher program would kill itself.
See: Pell grants.That would change with a voucher program. It's a nice idea on the surface, but it's really just subsidized private education that would end up changing private ed into something similar to our public ed system we have now. Unintended consequences and all that.
No.
Private schools, if they were endangered with what you are imagining, which is unlikely, would simply raise the price of tuition beyond the reach of voucher holders.
They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.Good idea! Screw the poor people, which is exactly what Thomas Jefferson DID NOT want.
Are you suggesting that poor parents aren't good?
I think she's suggesting that poor parents can't afford private school, even if they do give up their second house.
(that's sarcasm, if you couldn't see it)
See: Pell grants.That would change with a voucher program. It's a nice idea on the surface, but it's really just subsidized private education that would end up changing private ed into something similar to our public ed system we have now. Unintended consequences and all that.
No.
Private schools, if they were endangered with what you are imagining, which is unlikely, would simply raise the price of tuition beyond the reach of voucher holders.
They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.Are you suggesting that poor parents aren't good?
I think she's suggesting that poor parents can't afford private school, even if they do give up their second house.
(that's sarcasm, if you couldn't see it)
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
Why?
Did someone receive a $50,000/yr Pell Grant to pay their tuition to Harvard or Yale?
No...The point is that schools will raise their tuition when they get all that "free" money.
You want to watch tuitions drop like a rock, abolish Pell grants.
They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.Are you suggesting that poor parents aren't good?
I think she's suggesting that poor parents can't afford private school, even if they do give up their second house.
(that's sarcasm, if you couldn't see it)
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
I'm saying that the price for gubmint schools are artificially inflated.They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.I think she's suggesting that poor parents can't afford private school, even if they do give up their second house.
(that's sarcasm, if you couldn't see it)
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
So, you're saying they should live outdoors, and send their kids to private schools?
A price that is grossly inflated because gubmint runs them and bears no economic penalties for being wasteful and inefficient.They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.I think she's suggesting that poor parents can't afford private school, even if they do give up their second house.
(that's sarcasm, if you couldn't see it)
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
40% of American families make less than 35 thousand dollars a year. The average cost of private K-12 schools is $10,000 a year.
Are you suggesting that poor families go hungry to send their kids to private school?
I'm saying that the price for gubmint schools are artificially inflated.They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
So, you're saying they should live outdoors, and send their kids to private schools?
I'm also saying that the same marketplace that delivers the the cheapest and/or most valuable homes, food, clothing and transportation at the lowest possible prices can do the same for education.
A price that is grossly inflated because gubmint runs them and bears no economic penalties for being wasteful and inefficient.They seem to be able to afford to eat, live indoors, buy clothing and automobiles.
Perish the thought that parents prioritize their spending to provide the best education for their kids.
40% of American families make less than 35 thousand dollars a year. The average cost of private K-12 schools is $10,000 a year.
Are you suggesting that poor families go hungry to send their kids to private school?
No...The point is that schools will raise their tuition when they get all that "free" money.
You want to watch tuitions drop like a rock, abolish Pell grants.