Another Lie debunked-IG report concludes FBI did not spy on trump campaign

[Uncensored2008]

...which has already been proven...

proven by whom?

Admiral Rogers and the FISA court itself.

Rogers refuted that more than two years ago.

VOX???

Was ThinkProgress down?

Has IG Horowitz found FBI spying or not?

The report will be released on December 9th.

VOX, the NY Times, et al ARE LYING, as always. Some leaker took a third hand remark about embedding a spy in the campaign - which is already proven fact, BTW - and claim that the report says no spying. Well, bullshit. The NY Times are notorious fucking liars, leftist hacks who serve the party rather than report the news.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/02/fbi-sent-a-blonde-bombshell-to-meet-trump-aide-papadopoulos-report/

So we know for a FACT that the FBI embedded spies in the Trump campaign. The NY Times is trying to defuse the report through obfuscation and disinformation.

 

[Care4all]

Surveillance vs Spying

=

Legal predicate vs no legal predicate


???

 

[eagle1462010]

You can start at 1:20

 

[Dragonlady]

proven by whom?

Admiral Rogers and the FISA court itself.

Rogers refuted that more than two years ago.

VOX???

Was ThinkProgress down?

Has IG Horowitz found FBI spying or not?

The report will be released on December 9th.

VOX, the NY Times, et al ARE LYING, as always. Some leaker took a third hand remark about embedding a spy in the campaign - which is already proven fact, BTW - and claim that the report says no spying. Well, bullshit. The NY Times are notorious fucking liars, leftist hacks who serve the party rather than report the news.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/02/fbi-sent-a-blonde-bombshell-to-meet-trump-aide-papadopoulos-report/

So we know for a FACT that the FBI embedded spies in the Trump campaign. The NY Times is trying to defuse the report through obfuscation and disinformation.

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

 

[Olde Europe]

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

To be slightly more precise, the New York Post is a tabloid, reactionary shit stain on journalism, as is every other source the goof deems worth quoting. Calling that rag "almost questionable", MediaBias itself reveals both a lack of judgment, and a solid right-wing bias.

 

[Dragonlady]

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

To be slightly more precise, the New York Post is a tabloid, reactionary shit stain on journalism, as is every other source the goof deems worth quoting. Calling that rag "almost questionable", MediaBias itself reveals both a lack of judgment, and a solid right-wing bias.

To be fair, Media Bias did say that the Post had an extreme right wing bias. The "almost questionable" was their rating on fact based reporting.

It should also be noted that the Post is also owned by Rupert Murdoch so of course their lies mirror those of FOX News.

 

[tycho1572]

trump lied to you. And you fell for it. There are at least 8 heads that need to roll Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, ex-national security adviser John Bolton, acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Vice President Mike Pence, trump and I am including William Barr. There was no deep state. There was no coup. There is no witch hunt or hoax.

There was nothing but a bunch of trumps lies.

The time has come for trump.

In a huge blow to Trump, the DOJ watchdog found no evidence to support the claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 campaign
View attachment 292008
Sonam Sheth and Eliza Relman

The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with a draft of the report.

Trump has repeatedly and baselessly alleged that the FBI inserted covert operators in his campaign.

He also alleged, without evidence, that former President Barack Obama had intelligence officials tap his phones, a claim the report is also expected to undercut.

Sources told The Times and The Washington Post that while the report undermines Trump's most extreme claims, it also faults the FBI for making bureaucratic mistakes when applying for a warrant to surveil Carter Page, a former Trump campaign aide.

The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 presidential campaign while investigating whether the campaign was conspiring with the Russian government to interfere in the election, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with a draft of the report.

In a huge blow to Trump, the DOJ watchdog found no evidence to support the claim that the FBI spied on his 2016 campaign

The IG report hasn't been released. lol

 

[Olde Europe]

To be fair, Media Bias did say that the Post had an extreme right wing bias. The "almost questionable" was their rating on fact based reporting.

It should also be noted that the Post is also owned by Rupert Murdoch so of course their lies mirror those of FOX News.

No, they didn't:

"Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks."

 

[Oldstyle]

Admiral Rogers and the FISA court itself.

Rogers refuted that more than two years ago.

VOX???

Was ThinkProgress down?

Has IG Horowitz found FBI spying or not?

The report will be released on December 9th.

VOX, the NY Times, et al ARE LYING, as always. Some leaker took a third hand remark about embedding a spy in the campaign - which is already proven fact, BTW - and claim that the report says no spying. Well, bullshit. The NY Times are notorious fucking liars, leftist hacks who serve the party rather than report the news.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/02/fbi-sent-a-blonde-bombshell-to-meet-trump-aide-papadopoulos-report/

So we know for a FACT that the FBI embedded spies in the Trump campaign. The NY Times is trying to defuse the report through obfuscation and disinformation.

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

So the Times is biased on their word and story selection and their Op Eds aren't factual...but other than THAT they are reliable? (Eye Roll)

 

[eagle1462010]

Rogers refuted that more than two years ago.

VOX???

Was ThinkProgress down?

Has IG Horowitz found FBI spying or not?

The report will be released on December 9th.

VOX, the NY Times, et al ARE LYING, as always. Some leaker took a third hand remark about embedding a spy in the campaign - which is already proven fact, BTW - and claim that the report says no spying. Well, bullshit. The NY Times are notorious fucking liars, leftist hacks who serve the party rather than report the news.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/02/fbi-sent-a-blonde-bombshell-to-meet-trump-aide-papadopoulos-report/

So we know for a FACT that the FBI embedded spies in the Trump campaign. The NY Times is trying to defuse the report through obfuscation and disinformation.

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

So the Times is biased on their word and story selection and their Op Eds aren't factual...but other than THAT they are reliable? (Eye Roll)

I heard the times were good for emergency toilet paper if for some reason the stores run out of it.........better than nothing.......

 

[Seawytch]

Ah, the smell of Trumpster desperation...it overpowers the roasting turkey.

no desperation on this side witchey. the desperation is all with you dem/libs who have lied about this for years and are now being called to account for those lies.

the 2020 elections will be a bloodbath for the commie/dem party. and you can thank pelosi, schiff, schumer, swalwell, bernie, biden, warren and just about every other card carrying commie/dem

Uh huh...excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

 

[tycho1572]

Gotta love the desperation of our liberal community.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Another bullshit claim by Trump and Trumpers bites the dust

Debunk this claim
Steven halper was an fbi informant working for the fbi spying on the trump campaign

 

[eagle7_31]

Another bullshit claim by Trump and Trumpers bites the dust

Debunk this claim
Steven halper was an fbi informant working for the fbi spying on the trump campaign

I am going wait and see/ I don't trust most anyone in DC. The swamp protects the swamp

 

[Redfish]

Ah, the smell of Trumpster desperation...it overpowers the roasting turkey.

no desperation on this side witchey. the desperation is all with you dem/libs who have lied about this for years and are now being called to account for those lies.

the 2020 elections will be a bloodbath for the commie/dem party. and you can thank pelosi, schiff, schumer, swalwell, bernie, biden, warren and just about every other card carrying commie/dem

Uh huh...excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

I could not care less if you breathe or not, its up to you.

the dems who have attempted this coup will be held to account, keep watching.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Admiral Rogers and the FISA court itself.

Rogers refuted that more than two years ago.

VOX???

Was ThinkProgress down?

Has IG Horowitz found FBI spying or not?

The report will be released on December 9th.

VOX, the NY Times, et al ARE LYING, as always. Some leaker took a third hand remark about embedding a spy in the campaign - which is already proven fact, BTW - and claim that the report says no spying. Well, bullshit. The NY Times are notorious fucking liars, leftist hacks who serve the party rather than report the news.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/02/fbi-sent-a-blonde-bombshell-to-meet-trump-aide-papadopoulos-report/

So we know for a FACT that the FBI embedded spies in the Trump campaign. The NY Times is trying to defuse the report through obfuscation and disinformation.

You don;t know anything of the kind. As for the reputation of the New York Times, every single one of the stories that Trump claimed were "fake news", turned out to be true::

New York Times - Media Bias/Fact Check

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

Instead you quote the link to the New York Post, which MediaBias calls "almost questionable", their reporting and sourcing is so poor.

You prefer to believes liars who tell you what you want to hear, and continue to deny reality. This is why conservatives and their policies are such abject failures. The rabbid right ring media has conditioned conservatives to believe whatever they want to believe, and ignore facts.

The New York Times and personal injury attorneys have about the same reputation for honesty.

{
The Times story originally included the following line [emphasis added]: "The latest presidential tweets were proof to dismayed members of Mr. Trump's party that he still refuses to acknowledge a basic fact agreed upon by 17 American intelligence agencies that he now oversees: Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get him elected."

That figure is not accurate.}

A rather large New York Times correction

{The New York Times caused a firestorm over its reporting that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort attempted to pass internal Trump campaign data to a Russia oligarch with close ties to Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential race. Various sites declared the story by reporters Sharon LaFraniere, Kenneth P. Vogel and Maggie Haberman as the final corroboration of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. However, the New York Times later retracted the key connection to a Russian oligarch.}

New York Times Issues Retraction In Bombshell Collusion Story

{
The New York Times has corrected five stories on President Donald Trump’s response to the Charlottesville protests, admitting in each report to misquoting what the president said in the aftermath of the violence.

Four of the corrected reports misquoted what Trump said about who is to blame for the violence, and a fifth report from two star reporters misquoted what Trump said about the push to tear down Confederate statues. One of the corrections is egregious, while others are fairly minor, but taken together they reveal a trend of careless mistakes in reporting on Trump’s remarks.}

The New York Times Misquoted Trump’s Charlottesville Remarks In Five Different Reports

Shall I continue?

Lie, retract, lie again - it is the Modus Operandi of the fucking liars of the DNC controlled New York Times.

"All the News that Serves the Party"

 

[Uncensored2008]

To be slightly more precise, the New York Post is a tabloid, reactionary shit stain on journalism, as is every other source the goof deems worth quoting. Calling that rag "almost questionable", MediaBias itself reveals both a lack of judgment, and a solid right-wing bias.

What would you guess, the NY Post is 10,000 times more accurate and reliable than the holocaust deniers of the Times?

To be fair the Times only lies when it writes editorials. The problem is that ONLY editorials appears in the Antisemitic NY Times.

{
So after a coupla-few days went by, The Times removed the cartoon and explained that a wayward low-level editor had mistakenly posted it. Sure. It happens.

But then came this, from the international pages of The Times — a cartoon of a blind Netanyahu wearing a robe and holding in one hand a tablet with the Star of David and in another, a selfie stick.

Jonathan Greenblatt with the Anti-Defamation League said of the image in a tweet: “This is insensitive, inappropriate and offensive. It shows once again that the @NYTimes needs to educate its staff about #antiSemitism. We call on them to take immediate action.”

Just stop publishing cartoons that contain any images of Jews, of Israel, of Jewish leaders, for goodness sake, New York Times. And guess what?

New York Times Suspends All Future Syndicated Cartoons Amid Antisemitism Crisis Inside Newspaper,” Breitbart ran in a headline.

Yes, that seems best. The Gray Lady obviously has a serious problem — and honestly, it’s starting to seem less like a problem with insensitivity and ignorance and more like a problem with the Jewish people themselves.}

The old grey lying whore really hates Jews.

Say, what was that tweet from their senior News Editor?

Oh that's right.

So the old grey whore fired him, right? Oh, no? Well, they demoted him? No? Transferred? Uhno...

"All the News that Serves the Party."

I guess rank Antisemitism serves the party.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Ah, the smell of Trumpster desperation...it overpowers the roasting turkey.

no desperation on this side witchey. the desperation is all with you dem/libs who have lied about this for years and are now being called to account for those lies.

the 2020 elections will be a bloodbath for the commie/dem party. and you can thank pelosi, schiff, schumer, swalwell, bernie, biden, warren and just about every other card carrying commie/dem

Uh huh...excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

I could not care less if you breathe or not, its up to you.

the dems who have attempted this coup will be held to account, keep watching.

God I wish I believed that.

Sadly, Barr will admonish the Traitor democrats but will do nothing. We have to accept the fact that we have no law in this nation. We are ruled by capricious tyrants who make up the rules as they go along. Good men like Trump and Barr seem powerless to contain the evil, the democrats.

 

[Dragonlady]

Another bullshit claim by Trump and Trumpers bites the dust

Debunk this claim
Steven Halper was an fbi informant working for the fbi spying on the trump campaign

Do you have any proof whatsoever of that claim? That Halper was working for the FBI is an unproven conspiracy theory promoted by Russian interests to undermine the Mueller Investigation, but there is absolutely no evidence that this is true. I don't have to debunk anything. You can't "prove" a negative. You only can only prove things that happen, so show us the proof that Halpern set up Papadololous.

Last but not least, the IG's Report says otherwise, and the Denhem Report is expected to say the same. Barr personally went to Italy and asked the Italians about Halper and the Italians laughed in his face at this ridiculousness.

You need to be reminded that Papadololpous enthusiastically jumped at the opportunity to get the stolen emails, and then bragged about it in a public bar in London, and then when the FBI really did question him about it, he lied to the FBI.

When the Attorney General spends all of his time trying to find proof of every conspiracy theory Putin floats and Donald Trump embraces, while ignoring real crime and corruption, the country is in trouble.

 

[Seawytch]

Ah, the smell of Trumpster desperation...it overpowers the roasting turkey.

no desperation on this side witchey. the desperation is all with you dem/libs who have lied about this for years and are now being called to account for those lies.

the 2020 elections will be a bloodbath for the commie/dem party. and you can thank pelosi, schiff, schumer, swalwell, bernie, biden, warren and just about every other card carrying commie/dem

Uh huh...excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

I could not care less if you breathe or not, its up to you.

the dems who have attempted this coup will be held to account, keep watching.

Okay...I'm watching.