- Dec 4, 2013
- 5,403
- 606
- 155
and WHITES did pretty good at killing enemies throughout their History ACE .
No different than any other ethnicity - the myth of the noble savage is just that a myth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and WHITES did pretty good at killing enemies throughout their History ACE .
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.
The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.
"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.
------------------------------------- And difference is that WHITES with their Small numbers worldwide . Actually Conquered , Colonized , moved in and Dominated or Owned . See the English / British Empire on which the sun never set GBean . ------------------and WHITES did pretty good at killing enemies throughout their History ACE .
No different than any other ethnicity - the myth of the noble savage is just that a myth.
---------------------------------------------------------- I guess that the WHITES WON ACE .If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,There still are Kangz and shit in Africa. You just mad the best your people could do is infect other cultures and wipe them out with diseases.Yeah, we know.....
We
wuz
KANGS
an' sheeeeeit.
------------------------------------- and whats this mention of PRE HISTORY eh . Is that before there was any recorded written history and when BS and Fact all mixed together are thrown as being facts around Greenie ??Going back to pre-history blacks have migrated above the Sahara in multiple waves . Actually if you want to get technical The ancestors of the Caucasians and Asians are Africans - Adam and Eve if they existed at all were African --- Africans are the First Humans --- but of course this is all theory.It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.
"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
It is a racist designation according to Africans trailer park. So go back inside and cook your family pancakes for dinner.Sub Saharan Africa is a geographical description not a racial classification. Why don't you know this?It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.
"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,There still are Kangz and shit in Africa. You just mad the best your people could do is infect other cultures and wipe them out with diseases.
Your "ancestors" are still savages today....All anyone needs to demonstrate this is the deplorable way y'all treat one another -let alone whites- in places like Angola, Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda, Uganda, etcetera.
View attachment 292677
It is a racist designation according to Africans trailer park. So go back inside and cook your family pancakes for dinner.Sub Saharan Africa is a geographical description not a racial classification. Why don't you know this?It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.
"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,
Your "ancestors" are still savages today....All anyone needs to demonstrate this is the deplorable way y'all treat one another -let alone whites- in places like Angola, Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda, Uganda, etcetera.
View attachment 292677
Nairobi Kenya right now
Kinsasha, Democratic Republic of Congo
All white American town
Khartoum, Sudan
All white American town
View attachment 292710
Selma Pop. 2019 - 17,886
http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/selma-al-population/
- Black or African American: 80.43%
- White: 17.33%
- Two or more races: 0.87%
- Asian: 0.79%
- Other race: 0.40%
- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0.12%
- Native American: 0.05%
Follow the thread simpleton ... and you should really support bacteria - they're the only culture you seem to have.------------------------------------- and whats this mention of PRE HISTORY eh . Is that before there was any recorded written history and when BS and Fact all mixed together are thrown as being facts around Greenie ??Going back to pre-history blacks have migrated above the Sahara in multiple waves . Actually if you want to get technical The ancestors of the Caucasians and Asians are Africans - Adam and Eve if they existed at all were African --- Africans are the First Humans --- but of course this is all theory.It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.
"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
It might have been the birth place of the entire human race but hie great is a civilization that gets subsumed, surpassed or conquered?
Why did other societies advance so much faster technologically than those of Africa even if African societies may have been the first to develop the rudimentary technology that was then improved upon.
There is more to the story than the origin
And this is the problem with the white mans version of history. It leaves out most of what happens. Every word in this post is inaccurate. If there is more to the story than the origin, there is more to the story period.
The 15 Ways Europe Underdeveloped Africa
- 0.1 The 15 Ways Europe Underdeveloped Africa
- 0.2 Population Decline
- 0.3 Technological Arrest
- 0.4 Trade Imbalance
- 0.5 Market Disruption
- 0.6 The Expansion of Capitalism
- 0.7 Expatriation of Surplus
- 0.8 Wage Depression
- 0.9 Price Control and Monopolization
- 0.10 Colonial Government Policy and Taxation
- 0.11 Division of Labor
- 0.12 Growth Without Development
- 0.13 Monoculture
- 0.14 Undernourishment
- 0.15 Miseducation
- 0.16 White Values
- 1 The Legacy of Dr. Walter Rodney
History is written by the victors.
There never has been and there never will be a complete objective history of civilization
What does it matter if for example rudimentary iron work originated in one place but was perfected in another and those who perfected it conquered the people who invented it?
Besides chances are that there were other places that iron working was invented in the same era as it was in Africa.
Don't forget that people were not as mobile back then so there was not any meaningful exchange of technology
"What does it matter if for example rudimentary iron work originated in one place but was perfected in another and those who perfected it conquered the people who invented it?"
Thats what Black people want to know. Why is it so important to white people that they have to lie about what Blacks did long before whites were sentient? Africans were the first to develop steel and this is not commonly known. I've thought this over a lot and the only thing I can point to is that white men suffer from a incredibly viral inferiority complex.
as a comment , i think that cold weather and adverse condititions had a lot to do with WHITE Peoples achievements throughout recorded history . --------------- just a comment .
Sure, Africa had an early use of Iron ore, and Ceramics, but not the first. Certainly a far cry from equality.
Sure, Africa had an early use of Iron ore, and Ceramics, but not the first. Certainly a far cry from equality.
little pierogi -------"equality" is a word decent people VALUE. My field is neuroscience-------ALL HUMAN BEAN BRAINS are-------across the board-----
made the same. ------there are no RACIAL DIFFERENCES in any of the
populations studied. -------poles were not included in the studies.. HOWEVER---it is true that black persons who have resided for millennia in areas with lots of
MALARIA bugs-------do harbor lots of sickle cell disease------HAPPY NOW?
Sure, Africa had an early use of Iron ore, and Ceramics, but not the first. Certainly a far cry from equality.
little pierogi -------"equality" is a word decent people VALUE. My field is neuroscience-------ALL HUMAN BEAN BRAINS are-------across the board-----
made the same. ------there are no RACIAL DIFFERENCES in any of the
populations studied. -------poles were not included in the studies.. HOWEVER---it is true that black persons who have resided for millennia in areas with lots of
MALARIA bugs-------do harbor lots of sickle cell disease------HAPPY NOW?
Anybody who believes in racial equality, clearly is very ignorant.
It's like saying we're all equal in height racially, like a San Bushman, and a Dutchman won't have differences.
It's ridiculous beyond belief.