if the cops really thought the 2 passengers in the car were the shooters in a drive by shooting, why did they leave them in the car alone, so they could flee easily, and only have the driver step out for questioning?That kind of smart-ass reasoning is exactly why a lot of smart-ass n!ggers get shot.What was his reasonable cause to believe that...?
the guns of the driver, were under the seat and they found them AFTER they killed the kid.....
it says the back window of the car of the driver had some bullet holes in them,
but it did not say there were shards of glass inside the car from them being shot out 15 minutes earlier,
and it did not say they found the bullets inside the car from the drive by shooting victim that shot them out.
SO WHAT EXACTLY made these 2 boys running a risk to harm others?
The police believed they had adequate cause to believe the two occupants of the pursued vehicle had just performed a drive-by shooting and were thereby considered armed and dangerous. So when one of these suspects took off running did you expect the pursuing cop to wait for the runner to stop, turn, and either explain his innocence -- or shoot the cop?
The cops had cause to suspect the occupants of the car of a drive-by shooting. By running, that suspect affirmed the cops' suspicion that he was a menace to society.