- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,109
- 53,713
- 2,605
Maybe not. But their car matches the description of the ones that did it.I found this....and they were NOT involved with the drive by shooting. The guns they allegedly found in the car under the seat did not match the drive by shooting and I presume were not illegal, or they would have charged him with something.The guy that was a victim of the drive by shot back after he was shot.Do you have a link to that? the article in the op says nothing of the sort.The car was gray and riddled with bullet holesDid anyone read the article? They let the driver of the car they were in, go, after they interrogated him....
that means the drive by shooting, was NOT THEM
And godboy, you ain't no boy of God's.... you are one sick mother.... to cheer the unnecessary homicide, of a child of no threat to the officer....
According to the Post-Gazette, “Pennsylvania law allows police officers to use deadly force to prevent someone from escaping arrest if that person has committed a forcible felony, possesses a deadly weapon or if the person has indicated he or she will endanger human life or inflict bodily injury if not arrested.”
and may I ask, why is a car and passenger who have been shot up by some criminal, considered the criminal instead of the victim?
Just find another link. I read it on 3 seperate ones this morning.
The driver of the vehicle, a 20-year-old man, was taken into custody and released after McDonough said officers did not feel they had cause to charge him in the earlier shooting.
Unarmed black teen shot, killed by police as he was running away in Pittsburgh
Unarmed teen fatally shot by police while fleeing traffic stop
Police spotted what they believed was the same car in East Pittsburgh less than 15 minutes later. The car had bullet holes in the rear windows, the station reports.
East Pittsburgh police pulled over the car, and while the driver was being detained, two passengers ran from the car, including Rose.