Another DISASTER From Excessive Immigration

[danielpalos]

not an immigration clause. it is denying and disparaging State authority over immigration after 1808.

It doesn't have to be in the Constitution. We have THOUSANDS of LAWS that are not in the Constitution. They are still LAWS that may not be violated.

Are you trying to say that it is not illegal to cross the US border without inspection from US immigration authorities ?

we have a general welfare clause not a general immigration clause.

Article 1 section 9 clearly gives to Congress the authority and power to control Immigration it says so specifically.

No, it doesn't. It claims supremacy over entry into the Union. We have an express naturalization clause.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

not an immigration clause. it is denying and disparaging State authority over immigration after 1808.

It doesn't have to be in the Constitution. We have THOUSANDS of LAWS that are not in the Constitution. They are still LAWS that may not be violated.

Are you trying to say that it is not illegal to cross the US border without inspection from US immigration authorities ?

we have a general welfare clause not a general immigration clause.

Article 1 section 9 clearly gives to Congress the authority and power to control Immigration it says so specifically.

No, it doesn't. It claims supremacy over entry into the Union. We have an express naturalization clause.

And an EXPRESSED Immigration power of the Fed via the Constitution in article I section 9.

 

[danielpalos]

not an immigration clause. it is denying and disparaging State authority over immigration after 1808.

It doesn't have to be in the Constitution. We have THOUSANDS of LAWS that are not in the Constitution. They are still LAWS that may not be violated.

Are you trying to say that it is not illegal to cross the US border without inspection from US immigration authorities ?

we have a general welfare clause not a general immigration clause.

Article 1 section 9 clearly gives to Congress the authority and power to control Immigration it says so specifically.

No, it doesn't. It claims supremacy over entry into the Union. We have an express naturalization clause.

And an EXPRESSED Immigration power of the Fed via the Constitution in article I section 9.

The States no longer have any basis to care if someone is from out of State or from out of state since 1808.

That is the law.

 

[protectionist]

yes, the way you apply it. there is no provision for natural rights, only bigotry.

WHAT way that I "apply it" ? I don't know what you're talking about.

I don't "apply" nationalism. Nationalism is nationalism.

If you equate nationalism with bigotry, that's where you're going wrong. You need to take corrective action.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

It doesn't have to be in the Constitution. We have THOUSANDS of LAWS that are not in the Constitution. They are still LAWS that may not be violated.

Are you trying to say that it is not illegal to cross the US border without inspection from US immigration authorities ?

we have a general welfare clause not a general immigration clause.

Article 1 section 9 clearly gives to Congress the authority and power to control Immigration it says so specifically.

No, it doesn't. It claims supremacy over entry into the Union. We have an express naturalization clause.

And an EXPRESSED Immigration power of the Fed via the Constitution in article I section 9.

The States no longer have any basis to care if someone is from out of State or from out of state since 1808.

That is the law.

THE law is that that the Federal Government via the Congress controls Immigration since 1808 as per the clause Article I section 9 of the Constitution.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The only thing excessive is the unwarranted bigotry and hate directed at immigrants.

You mean trespassers.

You mean invaders.

 

[protectionist]

THE law is that that the Federal Government via the Congress controls Immigration since 1808 as per the clause Article I section 9 of the Constitution.

Not that you don't have good points, but ....Lets get back to the TOPIC of immigration causing a housing glut, and people (AMERICANS) being unable to find a place to live, while housing complexes are saturated with immigrants. (and landlords use the minimal supply to raise prices excessively)

 

[danielpalos]

yes, the way you apply it. there is no provision for natural rights, only bigotry.

WHAT way that I "apply it" ? I don't know what you're talking about.

I don't "apply" nationalism. Nationalism is nationalism.

If you equate nationalism with bigotry, that's where you're going wrong. You need to take corrective action.

natural rights; the right wing only alleges to Care in abortion threads where they can tell women what to do.

 

[danielpalos]

should be ruled unconstitutional. we have a naturalization clause not an immigration clause. we should have no illegals or any illegal underclass.

So you're saying that a law that doesn't have its subject matter in the Constitution is thereby unconstitutional ? LOL. Well, it looks like a few THOUSAND laws are unconstitutional then (sarcasm)

EARTH TO DP: Laws don't have to mentioned in the Constitution, to be avoid unconstitutionality. Wow. What school did YOU go to ?

8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

it is patently inequitable on its face with a naturalization clause. upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure will provide for the general welfare, not the general malfare.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. they have Home Depot in Mexico and they are our third largest trading partner. what do You believe they Do with that money.

This is all left-over from the past 4 highly irresponsible free-trading, imperialism-allowing US presidents (Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, Obama). 30 years of severe damage cannot be repaired overnight. Trump is doing the best he can to fix this massive idiocy, despite Democrat opposition/obstruction, but it will take time, and some of the damage is too deeply set to ever be fixed.

Capitalism; What is That, Sayeth the bigoted Right Wing.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a naturalization clause not an immigration clause and Tourism is the first, second, or third largest Employer in twenty-nine States.

That wasn't the question.

Once again, here is K9BUCK's question >> "You support open borders and unlimited immigration by anybody in the world that wants to live here, correct?"

Subject to US jurisdiction is our sovereignty. The right wing is simply clueless and Causeless.

 

[danielpalos]

Better urban planning is better. All of our US population could fit in the State of Texas.

I'm well aware of urban planning, I went to graduate school for it. Part of urban planning is not allowing so much immigration into your area, that it overwhelms your resource base (that includes not just jobs and natural resources, but HOUSING also)

why allege you subscribe to Capitalism and free markets when socialism on a national basis is all the right wing understands?

 

[danielpalos]

we have a general welfare clause not a general immigration clause.

Article 1 section 9 clearly gives to Congress the authority and power to control Immigration it says so specifically.

No, it doesn't. It claims supremacy over entry into the Union. We have an express naturalization clause.

And an EXPRESSED Immigration power of the Fed via the Constitution in article I section 9.

The States no longer have any basis to care if someone is from out of State or from out of state since 1808.

That is the law.

THE law is that that the Federal Government via the Congress controls Immigration since 1808 as per the clause Article I section 9 of the Constitution.

No, it doesn't. We have an express, federal, naturalization clause. The States have no concern over entry into the Union after 1808.

 

[danielpalos]

The only thing excessive is the unwarranted bigotry and hate directed at immigrants.

You mean trespassers.

You mean invaders.

drug war refugees.

 

[danielpalos]

THE law is that that the Federal Government via the Congress controls Immigration since 1808 as per the clause Article I section 9 of the Constitution.

Not that you don't have good points, but ....Lets get back to the TOPIC of immigration causing a housing glut, and people (AMERICANS) being unable to find a place to live, while housing complexes are saturated with immigrants. (and landlords use the minimal supply to raise prices excessively)

you mean Capitalists have no solutions under our form of Capitalism?