Ann Coulter: Why Can't We Get A List Of Women Who Have Abortions?

537770_516268375061699_912395606_n.jpg


The R's war on women continues but the left is winning.
 
How about a list of everyone who accepts SNAP money? They're fleecing the taxpayers and should be exposed. Most gun owners aren't harming anyone.
 
It's amusing to see all these 10th amendment buffs having suddenly decided that a state shouldn't have the right to regulate guns as the people of that state see fit.
 
Lets have a list of all men who take viagra?

How about a list of all women who are easy?

I always see this comparing Viagra to abortion. I don’t get it. I see the signs that say take away abortion take away Viagra for men. If one wants to compare something with a “health benefit’ that men get, why abortion? Something that would be similar to viagara the same would be Premarin vaginal cream for relief of painful intercourse due to menopause, something that many women need later in life as men need viagara. But to compare an abortion to viagara makes no sense to me.
 
CaféAuLait;6604579 said:
Lets have a list of all men who take viagra?

How about a list of all women who are easy?

I always see this comparing Viagra to abortion. ....

Close your eyes... Listen to common senses...

Common sense would be comparing a drug which enable's sex for a man ( Viagra) to another drug which enable's sex for a woman (Premarin Cream).
 
CaféAuLait;6604599 said:
CaféAuLait;6604579 said:
I always see this comparing Viagra to abortion. ....

Close your eyes... Listen to common senses...

Common sense would be comparing a drug which enable's sex for a man ( Viagra) to another drug which enable's sex for a woman (Premarin Cream).

Women need enabled for sex?

They pretty much have that territory covered.
 
CaféAuLait;6604599 said:
Close your eyes... Listen to common senses...

Common sense would be comparing a drug which enable's sex for a man ( Viagra) to another drug which enable's sex for a woman (Premarin Cream).

Women need enabled for sex?

They pretty much have that territory covered.

Yes, just like men, when they age, women too need drugs to be able to have sex without pain or just to feel in the mood. Premarin cream compares so much better to Viagara than abortion IMO.
 
CaféAuLait;6604616 said:
CaféAuLait;6604599 said:
Common sense would be comparing a drug which enable's sex for a man ( Viagra) to another drug which enable's sex for a woman (Premarin Cream).

Women need enabled for sex?

They pretty much have that territory covered.

Yes, just like men, when they age, women too need drugs to be able to have sex without pain or just to feel in the mood. Premarin cream compares so much better to Viagara than abortion IMO.

So old women who find sex painful are at risk of abortion.

Sounds like a 'Big Pharma' sales pitch to me.
 
CaféAuLait;6604616 said:
Women need enabled for sex?

They pretty much have that territory covered.

Yes, just like men, when they age, women too need drugs to be able to have sex without pain or just to feel in the mood. Premarin cream compares so much better to Viagara than abortion IMO.

So old women who find sex painful are at risk of abortion.

Sounds like a 'Big Pharma' sales pitch to me.

So you are saying that "old men" who need Viagara are able to impregnant women at the same rate they were at the age before they needed viagra? Again I do not see the logic. If one wants to compare a drug like viagara to something it makes sense to compare it to what the drug was intended for.

Viagara was not intended to get women pregnant it was intended to help a man have sex just like Premarin Cream is intended to help a woman have sex. Additionally I know of women who are using premarin who are not "old". Hormones are off, etc, there are many women who go through menopause at an early age, 25- 26 years old, premature menopause. And those who have had hysterectomies or oophorectomies.

'Big Pharma' has nothing to do with painful sex in women BTW.
 
Last edited:
The relative point she is making is that women who have had abortions have a right to privacy and do not want their names and addresses listed in a publication.. Gun owners deserve the same respect. Just because you disagree with the 2nd Amendment, doesn't give you the right to trample privacy. Many people don't agree with abortion and shouldn't trample on another's right to privacy just because their views differ.

its more like another failed attempt by a partisan to compare abortion with Gun rights.

I mean why not cancer victims? Or Aids, Or herpes? No it just had to be abortion. The agenda is quite clear.

I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on abortions.


I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on guns.

The difference one is a private matter between her and her doctor. The other isn't.
 
its more like another failed attempt by a partisan to compare abortion with Gun rights.

I mean why not cancer victims? Or Aids, Or herpes? No it just had to be abortion. The agenda is quite clear.

I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on abortions.


I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on guns because murder is never a private matter.

The difference one is a private matter between her and her doctor. The other isn't.

Care to point out one single example of me saying no right is absolute? How about me ever insisting that the government does not have the power and responsibility to restrict some people from owning guns? I guess that puts the ball back in the partisan court about restrictions on abortion.
 
Ann Coulter: Why Can't We Get A List Of Women Who Have Abortions?

Publishing the names of women who have had abortions is an interesting strategy to win back the women's vote and convince the nation's voters that the Republicans/Tea Party isn't being led by a bunch of conservative extremists.

The more attention Coulter receives, the less the Democrats need worry about 2014 and 2016.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top