sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
- Thread starter
- #121
This is nothing I’ve ever heard. Steele tried to leak it to major media sources, like CNN, who at the time knew not to touch it because of validity issues. Buzz-feed, same guys who falsely claimed sources from probe said indictments were on the way, bit on it and released at least part of it. After it came out, trump camp was quick to point out plenty of confirmable flaws with its validity that were not challenged by media sources. If you remember when trump found out his campaign was under surveillance by Obama DOJ/FBI, the GOP line was “you better have had other sources other than the dossier, because running surveillance on nothing but rumors is at the very least highly unethical, probably illegal.” Turns out, the dossier was the main source, and the other sources that were claimed to further justify the FISA warrant were just variations of the dossier dressed to look like separate sources (which is probably what you’re referring too). And then you have the Cohen testimony that sunk what little cred the dossier might have still had.Did the information collected in the dossier ever get released? (I'm not talking about the "Golden Showers" stuff). I have read in several places that the intelligence agencies say they've confirmed a good deal of it, but I've never known what they were "confirming." It seems to be secret?Yes the Russians did interfere...AND THE DOSSIER WAS HANDS DOWN THEIR MOST EFFECTIVE DIVIDER. Who was that pushed by? The dossier was obviously bogus, and they got the media and the Democratic Party to run with it as truthNo gloating here. As it’s becoming very apparently clear to folks today that they have been misled by claims of Russian collusion, I want to offer an olive branch. A chance to apologize and maybe say a little something about learning the lesson to let the facts come out. If done so, in exchange I won’t rub your nose in this catastrophic mess. Doesn’t mean you have to like trump or never point out perceived short comings. Just that you jumped the gun, or bought into sources that cared about political points and viewership more than truth.
I also hope some on the right will publicly commit to this too. Maybe some good could come out of this. Doubt there will be any takers but don’t say I didn’t try
Why?
The Russians did interfere.
Trump egged them on.
Let's see the whole report, and not the four page whitewash. Then we can discuss whether or not Trump is a Russian Plant, or just a crazy person with no idea what he is doing.
I really thought that the mueller probe would turn up something, minute and probably nothing actionable, but something that may have looked shady to at least rally the troops for the left (collusion wise). Kind of like how the obstruction charge is left open ended, but there is nothing there at all. A full exoneration shocked me because I didn’t think the left was this short sighted. I mean y’all just justified a lot of Trumps behavior, and gave him a very nice shiny weapon to bludgeon the left with. I actually watched cable news for the first time since the presidential election last night, I am that incredulous to the lefts response to all this still. This is a beautiful display of the law of institutions at work (look it up, and everything will all make sense to you). I mean don’t get me wrong the spin is clearly working on the lefts base, but that’s not who the left needs to convince or at least stay in good graces with. I’m sure there were a lot of independents who thought there was something to the collusion claims with the constant coverage and stories released about it. This is the best thing that could’ve happened to trump, a ingenious sabatour in the left could not have planned a more devastating series of bad decisions than what actually took place. Not saying trumps a shoe in for 2020, but it’s probably his race to loose now.