An Existential Danger To America

[PoliticalChic]

"...Library Journal felt comfortable adopting unabashedly racist ideology and intentionally spreading it to their followers as acceptable, mainstream discussion. It has become entirely reasonable and standard for leftist individuals and groups to profess racist, anti-white ideology without a second thought to the consequences. History has taught the neo-left absolutely nothing.


U.S. libraries are funded with taxpayer dollars, both through federal taxes and local state taxes. Any publicly-employed librarian who would destroy publicly-purchased property due to the fact that it was written by white authors would be engaging in discriminatory practices on the basis of race. Civil litigation or criminal charges might follow such conduct. State statutes penalizing official duties violations and criminal hate crime charges might be applicable. States usually penalize crimes against property that are motivated by a bias against race, color, religion, or national origin. These statutes are typically inclusive of vandalism against public property.

Librarians should be cautious of pursuing racist ideology. After all, one of the notorious acts of Hitler and the Nazis was to burn books written by Jewish authors, a 1933 tragedy that fueled the hate fires of anti-semitism and led to the 1938 burnings of human beings and their business on the streets of Nazi Germany. Beware of political mobs, librarians. "
Library Journal Laments 'Proliferate Whiteness' Of Authors With Books 'Physically Taking Up Space In Our Libraries'

 

[Kilroy2]

Typing away all your worries

 

[PoliticalChic]

Typing away all your worries

Providing you with the logic, experience, and education you so sorely lack.

 

[francoHFW]

The danger to America is when conspiracy and lies are believed for political expediency by one party

Socialism well unless the government owns the means of production then the US is no where near that

It is just repubs beating the drum and see who will dance

I see a lot of private enterprise that is alive and well

The government should step when private enterprise threatens the general public

The great depression when 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed.

1973 recession

1980 recession

2006 recession when sub prime mortgage problem created a banking and financial crisis.

The government step in as they should cause private enterprise was running amok

I can help.

Here is the existential threat to America:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


Wake the heck up, you dunce.

Yep. An amalgam of all the Fauxrageous false talking points put together like that really shows the dangers of and the main reason why Fox is Bad News for America.

Seems you are unable to produce any such 'false' talking points.


That must mean you're lying again, huh?

Hahaha.

Turn off Faux.

It's Bad News for America

amen to that.

Thank you, as always for your post and insight.

the most comedic post of the year.

what is a fox lie? Everything you know about Hillary Obama holder learner the FBI the CIA how much taxes the rich pay etcetera etcetera etcetera, dumbass dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

The greatest danger is repubs with computers who think with their keypads.

And, yet again, a Fascist who'd like nothing better than the silencing of opposing viewpoints.


Bet you're a government school grad, huh?

Opposing lies you mean, brainwash functional moron... No respected media in the world agrees with your brainwashed idiocy.

 

[francoHFW]

"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
   synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
   • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
     synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
     
     
   • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

"...socialism now means always Democrat fair capitalism with a good safety net."

No it doesn't.
I means what it always has....including the slaughter and imprisonment of those who don't fall in line.



Don't worry, you fool......I can help:


so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
   synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
   • policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
     synonyms: leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More
     
     
   • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Google.

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

 

[Clipper]

Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections

Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.

Triggered!

 

[Kilroy2]

The greatest danger is repubs with computers who think with their keypads.

And, yet again, a Fascist who'd like nothing better than the silencing of opposing viewpoints.


Bet you're a government school grad, huh?

Opposing lies you mean, brainwash functional moron... No respected media in the world agrees with your brainwashed idiocy.

Don't you mean making up lies that brainwash the people who believe that Trump does not lie, steal, cheat and supports health care because he can do it better.

 

[DustyInfinity]

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

That is pure BS. A safety net is helping people who need help and getting out of everyone else's way. That is not what you are talking about. You want to trap EVERYBODY in crappy government plans which are horrible for just about everyone, and give useless leaders more power over us. You are calling Republicans brainwashed and stupid, but at least we are smart enough not to put our future's completely at the mercy of career politicians.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The greatest danger is repubs with computers who think with their keypads.

And, yet again, a Fascist who'd like nothing better than the silencing of opposing viewpoints.


Bet you're a government school grad, huh?

Opposing lies you mean, brainwash functional moron... No respected media in the world agrees with your brainwashed idiocy.

I never lie.

And I'm never wrong.

You've helped proven this often enough.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

Agreed, Socialism is a system that can be very benign when first implemented and can coexist along with the capitalist sector which it needs to feed off of, but the problem is as failures begin to mount, a socialist leadership wont defer control back to the people themselves and the free market. Rather, they will double down and even demanding more control over the populations' actions will be the required remedy for these socialist geniuses. The result will be a detereorization over time in which the socialist establishment will then require more and more control even in the face of their failure. Eventually socialist systems must become more hard line and less benign in their natural progression approaching something like communism.

Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

You can run,but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.


The Democrats are in 'favor' of communism.

The front-runner of that party is a Marxist.


Got another lie for me to dispel????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections

Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.

Triggered!

How about you try to deal with the post.

 

[francoHFW]

Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

That is pure BS. A safety net is helping people who need help and getting out of everyone else's way. That is not what you are talking about. You want to trap EVERYBODY in crappy government plans which are horrible for just about everyone, and give useless leaders more power over us. You are calling Republicans brainwashed and stupid, but at least we are smart enough not to put our future's completely at the mercy of career politicians.

Actually, brainwashed functional moron, taxing the rich their fair share and cheap education and training would free people from the GOP trap of crap jobs, and give the Non Rich all kinds of good programs like Health Care daycare paid parental leav good vacations good infrastructure living wage etc etc. every other country modern country has all that stuff and we are the richest country in the world. Stop being a dupe....

 

[francoHFW]

Bologna, communism has only been put in by violent revolution. Socialism today is always democratic fair capitalism with a good safety net... Excepting Cold War dinosaur GOP dupe America. "We are all socialists now!--Finland prime minister when ObamaCare passed....

Bet you've read The Gulag Archipelago by Russian writer and historian Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

You can run,but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.


The Democrats are in 'favor' of communism.

The front-runner of that party is a Marxist.


Got another lie for me to dispel????

Absolute idiocy. How is the weather in Russia or is it Macedonia?

 

[mudwhistle]

Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections

Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.

Democrats suck.

 

[francoHFW]

Evidence is mounting that a particular party represents, as per the title of the thread, the end of America and great damage to Western Civilization, if it gets to wield unlimited power.

Guess which party.

Hint.....the one running on this platform: full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



When we see this sort of thing, the hand-writing is on the wall:

"MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books
MIT Librarian Slams White People For Writing Books

White people are oppressing PoCs because they write a lot of books which "physically" take up too much "space" in our nation's libraries and "promote and proliferate whiteness with their very existence," according to academic librarian Sofia Leung of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.





This racist manic writes:


"WHITENESS AS COLLECTIONS


I had this interesting mini-eureka moment a few weeks ago that I wanted to share for a few reasons. One, I don’t usually reflect on the connections that help me understand how I learn something new or what goes into coming up with some new concept. Most of the time, the connections aren’t clear to me. Two, I like to show students that inspiration for new “research” or “scholarly” ideas doesn’t have to come from only “scholarly” publications. Three, I need to write it out to fully understand how I came to this conclusion and to really understand what this conclusion means!

1. our library collections, because they are written mostly by straight white men, are a physical manifestation of white men ideas taking up all the space in our library stacks. Pause here and think about this.
2. If you don’t already know, “whiteness as property,” is a seminal Critical Race Theory (CRT) concept first introduced by Cheryl I. Harris in her 1993 Harvard Law Review article by the same name. She writes, “slavery as a system of property facilitated the merger of white identity and property” (p. 1721) and the formation of whiteness as property required the erasure of Native peoples. Basically, white people want to stay being white because of the privilege and protection whiteness affords under the law that they created. Harris also makes this really good point, “whiteness and property share a common premise — a conceptual nucleus — of a right to exclude” (1714). Bam! That really hits it on the head." Whiteness as Collections

Not dangerous?

A reminder, In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," she puts this prophetic question in the mouth of a Jewish traveler on the ship, speaking about the future for Jews in pre-war Germany:
"Listen, my friend, there are a million Jews in Germany alone. What are they going to do, kill us all?"


Democrats have already put citizens in concentration camps based on skin color.

Democrats suck.

GOP propaganda machine is what sucks, brainwashed functional moron. Everything you know is wrong. No respected media in the world agrees with you or your crap brainwashers and thieving Heroes...

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

You can run,but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.


The Democrats are in 'favor' of communism.

The front-runner of that party is a Marxist.


Got another lie for me to dispel????

Absolute idiocy. How is the weather in Russia or is it Macedonia?

Readers will note your tap-dance, and that you couldn't dispute what I've said.

 

[Yarddog]

No, I haven't read it though I have heard it referred to many times.

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

That is pure BS. A safety net is helping people who need help and getting out of everyone else's way. That is not what you are talking about. You want to trap EVERYBODY in crappy government plans which are horrible for just about everyone, and give useless leaders more power over us. You are calling Republicans brainwashed and stupid, but at least we are smart enough not to put our future's completely at the mercy of career politicians.

Actually, brainwashed functional moron, taxing the rich their fair share and cheap education and training would free people from the GOP trap of crap jobs, and give the Non Rich all kinds of good programs like Health Care daycare paid parental leav good vacations good infrastructure living wage etc etc. every other country modern country has all that stuff and we are the richest country in the world. Stop being a dupe....

We tax the rich their fair share. Last time I looked they are paying like 80% of taxes. You cant tax the rich enough to give everyone free health care and free education and expect there to still be rich people. This is the common thinking thread with both communists and socialists. hate the rich, punish the rich, the rich are the root of all problems etc. but then they cant stop there either... they will have to equate being white with being rich, aka (white privilige) in order to advance class division and animosity.
Education would be much cheaper if the system wasn't so top heavy. Funds are being syphoned away from actual educational needs at a rate much higher than the rest of the modern world. Throwing more money at it isnt going to fix that problem, only increase the corruption.

 

[francoHFW]

The

Well I have read it and I have read a day in the life of Denise denisovich, and I don't think it's any secret that communism in Russia was horrible...

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

That is pure BS. A safety net is helping people who need help and getting out of everyone else's way. That is not what you are talking about. You want to trap EVERYBODY in crappy government plans which are horrible for just about everyone, and give useless leaders more power over us. You are calling Republicans brainwashed and stupid, but at least we are smart enough not to put our future's completely at the mercy of career politicians.

Actually, brainwashed functional moron, taxing the rich their fair share and cheap education and training would free people from the GOP trap of crap jobs, and give the Non Rich all kinds of good programs like Health Care daycare paid parental leav good vacations good infrastructure living wage etc etc. every other country modern country has all that stuff and we are the richest country in the world. Stop being a dupe....

We tax the rich their fair share. Last time I looked they are paying like 80% of taxes. You cant tax the rich enough to give everyone free health care and free education and expect there to still be rich people. This is the common thinking thread with both communists and socialists. hate the rich, punish the rich, the rich are the root of all problems etc. but then they cant stop there either... they will have to equate being white with being rich, aka (white privilige) in order to advance class division and animosity.
Education would be much cheaper if the system wasn't so top heavy. Funds are being syphoned away from actual educational needs at a rate much higher than the rest of the modern world. Throwing more money at it isnt going to fix that problem, only increase the corruption.

That's because they make about 80% of the income now, super duper. Every country ever has had a progressive tax system because if you have a flat tax like we have now if you count all taxes, the rich get hugely rich and everyone else suffers. That's why we have the worst inequality and upward Mobility since the 1890s and in the modern world. Great job! Only brainwashed ignoramuses like you make it possible. The GOP propaganda machine is a total disgrace and so are you.

 

[Yarddog]

The

Communism....socialism....Leftism......all the same and all terrible and the road to slaughter.



Boris Yeltsin himself showed the error of this attempt:

In September of 1991, the President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, was asked about the history and future of Communism:
“One of their more dramatic responses came to a question by Los Angeles actor Ben Stein, who asked whether the two leaders believed any country should live under communism.

Yeltsin answered first: "This experiment which was conducted on our soil was a tragedy for our people and it was too bad that it happened on our territory. It would have been better if the experiment had happened in some small country, to make it clear that it was a Utopian idea, although a beautiful idea."

Gorbachev said history has shown that "that model has failed which was brought about in our country. And I believe that this is a lesson not only for our people but for all peoples.” GORBACHEV, YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR

nobody is in favor of Communism, you brainwashed functional idiot. Everyone is talking about socialism which nowadays everywhere but your idiotic propaganda world is known in the modern world as fair capitalism with a good safety net. You have pure s*** for brains, super duper.

That is pure BS. A safety net is helping people who need help and getting out of everyone else's way. That is not what you are talking about. You want to trap EVERYBODY in crappy government plans which are horrible for just about everyone, and give useless leaders more power over us. You are calling Republicans brainwashed and stupid, but at least we are smart enough not to put our future's completely at the mercy of career politicians.

Actually, brainwashed functional moron, taxing the rich their fair share and cheap education and training would free people from the GOP trap of crap jobs, and give the Non Rich all kinds of good programs like Health Care daycare paid parental leav good vacations good infrastructure living wage etc etc. every other country modern country has all that stuff and we are the richest country in the world. Stop being a dupe....

We tax the rich their fair share. Last time I looked they are paying like 80% of taxes. You cant tax the rich enough to give everyone free health care and free education and expect there to still be rich people. This is the common thinking thread with both communists and socialists. hate the rich, punish the rich, the rich are the root of all problems etc. but then they cant stop there either... they will have to equate being white with being rich, aka (white privilige) in order to advance class division and animosity.
Education would be much cheaper if the system wasn't so top heavy. Funds are being syphoned away from actual educational needs at a rate much higher than the rest of the modern world. Throwing more money at it isnt going to fix that problem, only increase the corruption.

That's because they make about 80% of the income now, super duper. Every country ever has had a progressive tax system because if you have a flat tax like we have now if you count all taxes, the rich get hugely rich and everyone else suffers. That's why we have the worst inequality and upward Mobility since the 1890s and in the modern world. Great job! Only brainwashed ignoramuses like you make it possible. The GOP propaganda machine is a total disgrace and so are you.

sure sure, tax them 110% then. They do have the power at that level to take their money elsewhere. we have the worst upward mobility? really really dupe? then explain why in the US the number of millionaires is increasing more than anywhere else in the world. Including minorities increasingly. We get it though, that Socialists would like to stop all that. Generational wealth is a sin according to you guys.

furthermore when you have an imported lower class of illegals which is probably anywhere from 30 to 50 million people, many of whom were illiterate in their own language, it sort of skews that wealth disparity number, AND it doesn't help the native born US citizens who are homeless and living on the street of getting the attention they need in getting back into society.