Among other reasons, why Trump MUST release his tax returns

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

Pubs do, too, as you well know.

Of course the Dems will shop as well will the Pubs.

 

[danielpalos]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

where is wikileaks, when we need them?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

where is wikileaks, when we need them?

Maybe a new 'wikileaks' team in IRS and FBI are setting up shop?

 

[danielpalos]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

Public interest; the People have a need to know.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

Public interest; the People have a need to know.

Wrong answer, but you already knew that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

Public interest; the People have a need to know.

Wrong answer, but you already knew that.

Correct answer, as you well know, and you know will eventually happen.

 

[danielpalos]

Yup, the returns will be released by the courts, or leaked by someone at IRS who is getting to retire.

What reason will the courts use to force their release. The laws are pretty clear. Will the Dems shop for judges like they did on the immigration EO?

Public interest; the People have a need to know.

Wrong answer, but you already knew that.

You need an actual reason; otherwise, all you have is your usual, unsubstantiated opinion.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yep, and Clinton Foundation took money from Russia, so would have that made Clinton dangerous? If you are a partisan nut job like yourself you will justify it.

Some day, when you grown up, you too will know the difference between charity giving to a Foundation, AND low-interest loans made to a developer of golf courses from Russian oligarchs who are NOT known for being kind-hearted sweethearts when they such loans.....Usually they want something back and in this case, its wanting something back from the moron who currently sits in the oval office.

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

 

[Papageorgio]

I never cared to see his tax return and if he releases it then I'd only consider it a matter of credibility of keeping a campaign promise. If he doesn't it wouldn't break my heart as this one won't kill anybody.

why does Mr. Trump need a tax break?

The rich make the laws for the rich.

 

[Papageorgio]

So you have never "complained" about the rich paying their fair share. You have never complained that Trump paid zero taxes.
You have never complained that the poor pays too much in taxes.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. Mr. Trump has as much Standing regarding social welfare policy, as the poor. The poor only pay the taxes they are legally obligated to pay. The rich have to spend money on tax loopholes, large enough to drive a yacht, through.

the tax code was written by congress. Congress has been dominated by democrats for the last 80 years. Any idea who put those loopholes in the tax code?

crony capitalism works when socialism for free fails.

So you have no idea why liberal democrats made tax deductions for the rich?

they had plenty of help from their "pro capitalism" friends?

They didn't need any help, the rich write tax laws for the rich, liberals love the rich.

 

[my2¢]

I never cared to see his tax return and if he releases it then I'd only consider it a matter of credibility of keeping a campaign promise. If he doesn't it wouldn't break my heart as this one won't kill anybody.

why does Mr. Trump need a tax break?

I'm really not sure he does. It seems to me those with the most taxable income pay the most in taxes. But my guess is that a whole lot of pages of the tax code are about defining what is and isn't taxable income.

 

[edward37]

It has nothing to do with cheating and everything to do with his sources of income and who he is doing business with

So were you concerned about the Clinton Foundation and the accepting money from foreign countries, or just Trump and Russia?

Russia got involved in our elections Clinton foundation is ranked VERY highly by those who grade such things Russia and their trump friend are scum no matter how hard you try and change the subject

Partisan nutter, got a link by "those who grade such things"?

so says one of the looniest partisan nutters on the board.

you might want to try charity watch, ignoramous.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

So you have to answer for your buddy? Interesting!

pap you know the drill ,,,an enemy of my enemy is my friend

 

[edward37]

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. Mr. Trump has as much Standing regarding social welfare policy, as the poor. The poor only pay the taxes they are legally obligated to pay. The rich have to spend money on tax loopholes, large enough to drive a yacht, through.

the tax code was written by congress. Congress has been dominated by democrats for the last 80 years. Any idea who put those loopholes in the tax code?

crony capitalism works when socialism for free fails.

So you have no idea why liberal democrats made tax deductions for the rich?

they had plenty of help from their "pro capitalism" friends?

They didn't need any help, the rich write tax laws for the rich, liberals love the rich.

yes pap ,,as noted by those million and billionaires in trumps cabinet and they will be getting richer over the next 4 years

 

[edward37]

It has nothing to do with cheating and everything to do with his sources of income and who he is doing business with

So were you concerned about the Clinton Foundation and the accepting money from foreign countries, or just Trump and Russia?

The Clinton foundation was candid about donors. And there was never any evidence of misusing power.

But you wackjobs thing the orange sociopath can run a hotel which has foreign visitors and also has a lease with our government which is the orange sociopath.

Try doing a little research into conflicts of interest. Show a little honesty.

Yes, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid U.S. Russian Uranium Deal | The Huffington Post

I am honest, I have said all along to investigate the Russia and Trump election hacking. If a judge wants to subpoena Trumps tax records, I am all for it. For the public to make accusations and wanting to see taxes just because, it silly just like the Benghazi BS!

So go sell your tripe to someone else.

But pap trump has dealings all over the world Is it not prudent to make sure that there is no unusual exchanges of money or property involved?

There is no precedent to make a President reveal his taxes. You want to see, just in case? What happened to the presumptions of innocence until proven guilty.

pap try to use your lol non partisan brain for a moment,,,if some one is hiding info from you don't you think that the info would bury him .....info presidents for many years have not been afraid to show?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yep, and Clinton Foundation took money from Russia, so would have that made Clinton dangerous? If you are a partisan nut job like yourself you will justify it.

Some day, when you grown up, you too will know the difference between charity giving to a Foundation, AND low-interest loans made to a developer of golf courses from Russian oligarchs who are NOT known for being kind-hearted sweethearts when they such loans.....Usually they want something back and in this case, its wanting something back from the moron who currently sits in the oval office.

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

Well, that's your opinion, yes, but they will eventually be released.

 

[Redfish]

Yep, and Clinton Foundation took money from Russia, so would have that made Clinton dangerous? If you are a partisan nut job like yourself you will justify it.

Some day, when you grown up, you too will know the difference between charity giving to a Foundation, AND low-interest loans made to a developer of golf courses from Russian oligarchs who are NOT known for being kind-hearted sweethearts when they such loans.....Usually they want something back and in this case, its wanting something back from the moron who currently sits in the oval office.

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

Well, that's your opinion, yes, but they will eventually be released.

what exactly do you expect to find in his returns? He gets audited every year. If he was not complying with the tax code the IRS would be all over him. Are they? NO.

You on the left don't like the tax code. Neither do I. Do you know who wrote it? Congress. Which party has controlled congress for most of the last century? Dems.

So you need to look at your own party when you bitch about loopholes for the rich. They created them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Some day, when you grown up, you too will know the difference between charity giving to a Foundation, AND low-interest loans made to a developer of golf courses from Russian oligarchs who are NOT known for being kind-hearted sweethearts when they such loans.....Usually they want something back and in this case, its wanting something back from the moron who currently sits in the oval office.

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

Well, that's your opinion, yes, but they will eventually be released.

what exactly do you expect to find in his returns? He gets audited every year. If he was not complying with the tax code the IRS would be all over him. Are they? NO.

You on the left don't like the tax code. Neither do I. Do you know who wrote it? Congress. Which party has controlled congress for most of the last century? Dems.

So you need to look at your own party when you bitch about loopholes for the rich. They created them.

My party is the GOP, which has overwhelmingly controlled the majority since 1994.

Either the courts or a leaker will get them out to the public.

 

[Redfish]

Yep, and Clinton Foundation took money from Russia, so would have that made Clinton dangerous? If you are a partisan nut job like yourself you will justify it.

Some day, when you grown up, you too will know the difference between charity giving to a Foundation, AND low-interest loans made to a developer of golf courses from Russian oligarchs who are NOT known for being kind-hearted sweethearts when they such loans.....Usually they want something back and in this case, its wanting something back from the moron who currently sits in the oval office.

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

Well, that's your opinion, yes, but they will eventually be released.

ok snake. your sig cartoon complains about Russia hacking our election. Exactly how did they do that? Did they tamper with voting machines? Did they bribe vote counters? Did they cast fake votes?

Wikileaks put out FACTS that prove corruption within the DNC, the Clinton campaign, and the media. There is no proof that wiki got the info from Russia.

This is a red herring, and you fricken well know it.

 

[Redfish]

Report: Russian Government Initiative Gave Millions of Dollars to Clinton Foundation

Do you want to speculate why the Russians gave millions to her foundation while Clinton she was Secretary of State? Usually as you say, they want something back.

No I don't think anything happened there and we have no proof it has happened with Trump.

It still boils down to there not being a law to release his taxes. And all the speculation without evidence is nothing more than liberals throwing a tantrum.

So it is OK for Trump but not Clinton. Or people want Trump to be like Clinton.

I stated I don't think it happened with Clinton, I also see no evidence it happened with Trump. It is all speculation, both Trump and Clinton. Benghazi, emails, birther bs, it is liberals revenge for all that. Just more silliness by the extreme sides.

Well, that's your opinion, yes, but they will eventually be released.

what exactly do you expect to find in his returns? He gets audited every year. If he was not complying with the tax code the IRS would be all over him. Are they? NO.

You on the left don't like the tax code. Neither do I. Do you know who wrote it? Congress. Which party has controlled congress for most of the last century? Dems.

So you need to look at your own party when you bitch about loopholes for the rich. They created them.

My party is the GOP, which has overwhelmingly controlled the majority since 1994.

Either the courts or a leaker will get them out to the public.

LOL, you are not a republican. But you didn't answer my question. What do you expect to find in his hundreds of pages of tax returns?

on your second point, most of the tax code was written when dems controlled congress