America’s Most Advanced Climate Station Data Shows US In A 10-Year Cooling Trend Read more: http:

Most of the data used by all the global temp agencies is the same dataset so the different products are only independent as far as the algorithms used to homogenize the figures. BEST uses some additional data but it is principally built on the same numbers.

Rural stations are considered better because they are less contaminated by UHI and give a cleaner signal. After 2000 Hansen and GISS went to night brightness to classify rural and urban areas. This would be reasonable if GPS locations were accurate. But often they are not. You would think that organizations with billion dollar budgets could afford to check the coordinates but that is not the case. Many stations are off by kilometers, some by thousands.

Previously I posted on a Russian station that was classified as rural even though it was in a city built up around an aluminum smelter. Why? Because the original coordinates are now in a reservoir behind a dam to produce the electricity needed. Bad enough that one station is fucked up but that station is used to 'homogenize' all the other stations within hundreds of kilometers.

There are other examples in the States where the coordinates are off enough to place the station in nearby lakes rivers and oceans. You would think common sense would catch these mistakes but many remain on the books even after they have been pointed out.

The recent Paraguay fiasco led me to check on the coordinates of one of main stations involved. It put the station across the river into a different country.

Anyone who takes the easy way out by assuming that everything is just fine because the experts say so would be sorely disappointed if they checked into things more closely.
 
Heat moves in all directions. That includes the heat of the hot side and the heat of the cold side. There's more of one than the other, so NET heat moves from hot to cold. Get it?

And you ace
The US may only be a small part of the globe but it has a quarter of the total temp readings.

Africa has basically zero decent records so it is infilled and estimated. But still counts for twice as much as the US, and the difference in certainty? Doesn't matter apparently.

Is there any rational, scientifically valid reason to believe that if the CRN network were extended over the entire land mass of the earth the same decline temperature wouldn't be evident everywere?

Given global satellite coverage of a declining temp it is safe to assume that decline would be present. While not 100%, as there would most certainly be areas which are warming. The global average would not however.

The infilling in Africa and the arctic/antarctic regions is always warmer than observation by 1.2 deg C. Not sure why that number keeps popping up but it does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top