Excatly right! We've heard nothing from West, but we heard an outcry from DWS and her allies who always take offense when one of their "ladies" gets back what she hands out.Seems to me that he isn't the one whining though. He isn't the one claiming victim status because he got caught redhanded doing something cowardly and unethical and got yelled at for it.
Oh, you mean his whiney little e-mail doesn't really exist?
I read the e-mail. You read the e-mail or had plenty of chance to do so on this thread. One of us has a really screwed up perception in order to call it whiney. I haven't called it whiney. If it was a whiney little e-mail why would Schultz's toadies feel a need to defend her?
Again I do NOT fault West for calling her on her unprofessional, unethical, and cowardly behavior. I do fault him for the language he used to do that, not because it was directed at a woman, but because he left himself open to be criticized for the language.
I do NOT think a woman in Congress should be treated with any more deference than a man, however, and she absolutely deserved to be called out for what she did.