- Sep 16, 2012
- 58,075
- 51,667
- 3,605
If it's any consolation, I feel that exact same way about the National Review.I was talking to TN. Didn't mean to offend you. I just pulled up its website (the Atlantic), and it has changed a lot from when I used to read it. At least the on-line stuff is heavily political these days. The magazine itself didn't used to be. But I don't subscribe to it anymore.Have you READ the Atlantic? Ever? They aren't news reporters, anyway. They write in depth articles on particular issues of interest, usually because they're in the news, but it isn't "news reporting" per se.They are dumb. Very few outlets report the news, instead of their personal spin or strait up lies.How DARE you compare InfoWars to the Atlantic?Ok. Then we also need remove CNN, FOX, WP, MSN, Mother jones, the atlantic, VOX etc etc etc
Acting like only a few media outlets are dishonest, is dishonest.
That's dumb.
I have occasionally (now by mistake) stumbled into some of MindWars' posts and a lot of times even the headlines on an InfoWars article is a complete lie. Its own article disproves it. It's a total bullshit site and the Atlantic is NOT. You could learn stuff.
Of course I have read the Atlantic. I read everything.
In high school, I used to have a subscription to them.
Then I got an education on how the world actually works.
Don't you understand how the Atlantic knew to be at the Spencer speech in the fist place?
Some time you should actually get a hard copy of the magazine, look at all the folks that put the magazine together, and then Google their history, and their careers. It is like a revolving door throughout elite organizations in the establishment.
Their articles are constructed to make you perceive the world a certain way. TNHarley already addressed this.
OTH, some of their articles ARE really great. Anything that is non-political is truly awesome.
My mother still gets the Smithsonian. I quit my subscription to that magazine for the same reason. The CFR and Round Table politics is nefarious in the way it brainwashes you.
It is still a damned site more intelligent than InfoWars. That's yellow journalism at its worst, I don't care WHO it supports. I don't slam the National Review for having conservative viewpoints. It's got a slant, but it's written by people who know what they're talking about. I don't see where people get off saying something is a LIE, NOT TRUE, just because they don't like what it says.
Rubs me the wrong way.
In fact, the editors and owners of both magazines sit down together and agree on what's good for the public and what they need to have the public believe at the CFR.
That's why, though I think sites like INFOWARS are meant to make you feel disgusted with them, that is the whole point.
They too are run by the establishment, because the establishment knows that they cannot keep the truth away from a free people. So they purposely have their agents disseminate it in the most obnoxious, annoying, illegitimate way possible, so that folks will not believe that it is the truth. Along the way, they intersperse it with falsehoods and lies, so they think that everything that comes from that source is fake.
So you see, in fact, INFOWARS actually is usually the best place to get the most important news for your life concerning our democracy.
Jones' parents were Jesuits and ex-CIA, folks don't realize that. He is part of the establishment, and the whole outfit could not exist w/o the nod of the establishment. If anyone else tried to go to the Bohemian grove or started snooping around the Bilderburg meetings they would probably be shot or arrested. It would not surprise me in the least to find out that after Jones' Grove investigation, they just welcomed him into the gathering.
This way, "the powers that be" control the narrative. Now some folks think things are bad, but how bad?
Well, everyone knows Jones is a lunatic and a hot head, right? Most don't realize, he is only a dancing monkey for the establishment. . . . .