All men were created equal!!!

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
54,052
53,061
3,605
Words written down in the Declaration of Independence ring as true today ad they did in the 1700's. In a Left-wing nihilistic world of today that the Left has created with rampant crime and with everyone focused more on what type of genitals they have or the interesting various never-ending activities they like to do with their genitals that challenge cultural norms, these words still continue to ring true despite the Left-wing bestial replacement we have today. After all, what makes us men, i.e. human beings, and separates us from the animal kingdom, is not based on focusing on our genitalia. Instead, it is based on ideas that supersede the material world. If not, if the Left is correct and mankind is just a glorified beast, then they will be treated by them as such as they are herded around, locked in zoos, used as beasts of burden, or merely killed for food or just on a whim. In other words, socialism

Unfortunatlyk this type of thinking is no longer mainstreams as we live in a world where state run education wishes to cancel such documents, and cancel the men who wrote them, but most importantly, cancel the ideas behind these concepts. It is why despite them allowing slavery after creating these documents, it lit the fire of independence for the slaves that still remained in captivity. For once you utter and embrace those words, freedom must as some point be realized. At some point, the question must be asked, why is the slave not a man? Why are they treated as subhuman? And today, the same questions permeate society, what makes the unborn not human? They always seem to come out as such, so what mysteries linger in the womb that prevents them from being human and having rights as well. Both the slave and unborn child will one day walk hand in hand embracing the document that was written in the 1700's. Why do we fine someone thousands of dollars for destroying the eggs of an eagle, for example, but want to pay millions of dollars to people who want to terminate their unborn child? I would even argue that the Left values the lives of animals more than humans.

And while the Left would call this "regressive" because the document was written so long ago, and because the men who wrote the document owned slaves, the Left will not seek to celebrate this document, nor will they seek to learn from it if such words are as evil and inconsequential as they may say. No, we should either learn to celebrate history or learn from it's mistakes. Cancelling history only retards the development of a people as it negates the good that may have come from them and negate the lessons of the evils that we wish not to repeat. That is why to many, those on the left seem to be mildly to severely retarded thesmeves.

So today, which is the 4rth of July, celebrate the words uttered by Thomas Jefferson and embraced by the Founding Fathers, "All men were created equal". And unlike the Left, whose ideology is that some of us are more equal than others, may we learn to fight their very ideology that would bring us all back into slavery.
 
In the practice of human governance equality should always be a goal but it is never a fact. A devotion to equality is a never ending battle against the system and the elites it serves. You can't just say all men are equal and then do nothing to promote equality. Naturally promoting equality ruffles the feathers of those who think their livelihoods depend on the status quo.
 
What is a woman?

The bearer of life ... without which ... humans are no more ...

In 1776, women were considered property ... not until 1866 did ownership rights become illegal ... even in my own lifetime, a man beating his wife to death was his own affair and none of society's ... no more of a bother than a man chopping down his own tree ...

The sad truth is when our forefathers said "all men are created equal" ... they only included white men who owned land; tenants, slaves, women, Jews, Slavs and Chinese were all sub-human and not entitled to any rights ...
 
The bearer of life ... without which ... humans are no more ...

In 1776, women were considered property ... not until 1866 did ownership rights become illegal ... even in my own lifetime, a man beating his wife to death was his own affair and none of society's ... no more of a bother than a man chopping down his own tree ...

The sad truth is when our forefathers said "all men are created equal" ... they only included white men who owned land; tenants, slaves, women, Jews, Slavs and Chinese were all sub-human and not entitled to any rights ...
So is a honey bee.
 
In the practice of human governance equality should always be a goal but it is never a fact. A devotion to equality is a never ending battle against the system and the elites it serves. You can't just say all men are equal and then do nothing to promote equality. Naturally promoting equality ruffles the feathers of those who think their livelihoods depend on the status quo.
1656947550919.png


We just did do something about it.
 
The bearer of life ... without which ... humans are no more ...

In 1776, women were considered property ... not until 1866 did ownership rights become illegal ... even in my own lifetime, a man beating his wife to death was his own affair and none of society's ... no more of a bother than a man chopping down his own tree ...

The sad truth is when our forefathers said "all men are created equal" ... they only included white men who owned land; tenants, slaves, women, Jews, Slavs and Chinese were all sub-human and not entitled to any rights ...
where do you live where it’s legal for a man to beat his wife to death?
 
The Left has destroyed women.

Being a woman is now "fluid", ever changing, thus women exist as much as the tide in an ocean.........................
Thanks to the leftists and KBJ, "women's rights" is now nothing but a colossal joke. Back when I was interested in protesting, we fought for ACTUAL women's rights.
 
I found an interesting political philosopher named Leo Strauss as he discussed fredom.


Strauss argued that liberalism in its modern form (which is oriented toward universal freedom as opposed to "ancient liberalism" which is oriented toward human excellence), contained within it an intrinsic tendency towards extreme relativism, which in turn led to two types of nihilism:[68]

The first was a "brutal" nihilism, expressed in Nazi and Bolshevik regimes. In On Tyranny, he wrote that these ideologies, both descendants of Enlightenment thought, tried to destroy all traditions, history, ethics, and moral standards and replace them by force under which nature and mankind are subjugated and conquered.[69] The second type—the "gentle" nihilism expressed in Western liberal democracies—was a kind of value-free aimlessness and a hedonistic "permissive egalitarianism", which he saw as permeating the fabric of contemporary American society.[70][71]

In the belief that 20th-century relativism, scientism, historicism, and nihilism were all implicated in the deterioration of modern society and philosophy, Strauss sought to uncover the philosophical pathways that had led to this situation. The resultant study led him to advocate a tentative return to classical political philosophy as a starting point for judging political action.
[72]

I see elements of both brutal nihilism and gentle nihilism in the Left today.
 
I found an interesting political philosopher named Leo Strauss as he discussed fredom.


Strauss argued that liberalism in its modern form (which is oriented toward universal freedom as opposed to "ancient liberalism" which is oriented toward human excellence), contained within it an intrinsic tendency towards extreme relativism, which in turn led to two types of nihilism:[68]

The first was a "brutal" nihilism, expressed in Nazi and Bolshevik regimes. In On Tyranny, he wrote that these ideologies, both descendants of Enlightenment thought, tried to destroy all traditions, history, ethics, and moral standards and replace them by force under which nature and mankind are subjugated and conquered.[69] The second type—the "gentle" nihilism expressed in Western liberal democracies—was a kind of value-free aimlessness and a hedonistic "permissive egalitarianism", which he saw as permeating the fabric of contemporary American society.[70][71]

In the belief that 20th-century relativism, scientism, historicism, and nihilism were all implicated in the deterioration of modern society and philosophy, Strauss sought to uncover the philosophical pathways that had led to this situation. The resultant study led him to advocate a tentative return to classical political philosophy as a starting point for judging political action.
[72]

I see elements of both brutal nihilism and gentle nihilism in the Left today.
When I put myself in a physical place to encounter the leftists that live in my world, the organic food coop, almost everyone I see looks either angry or scared. Some look possessed.
 
Again, we are more than our genitalia, and/or more than our sexual identity.

That is why I refuse to have someone refer me by a gender specific pronoun, and you should as well.

I have a name damn it!!! Anything else I find offensive

After all, if gender really is fluid, i.e. ever changing, why would you use a pronoun that is the gender flavor of the month to describe who you are?

And by the way, Leftists like AOC need to stop using the term "menstruating people" because this term if the most offensive of all of them

You may as well call women tampons.
 
where do you live where it’s legal for a man to beat his wife to death?

In 1776? ... this would have been Umpqua territory ... Robert Grey didn't sail up the Columbia River until 1792, which is generally considered the first European (actually an American) to land in the Pacific Northwest ... so I don't know ...

But killing your wife instead of divorce was still practiced in rural Brazil in the 1960's ... perhaps later ... I guess it was just prosecutorial discretion back then in Oregon ... too busy with cattle rustlers ...
 
Words written down in the Declaration of Independence ring as true today ad they did in the 1700's.

Were they really true in the 1700s?

Or at least, did the people that wrote them really think they were true?
 
In 1776? ... this would have been Umpqua territory ... Robert Grey didn't sail up the Columbia River until 1792, which is generally considered the first European (actually an American) to land in the Pacific Northwest ... so I don't know ...

But killing your wife instead of divorce was still practiced in rural Brazil in the 1960's ... perhaps later ... I guess it was just prosecutorial discretion back then in Oregon ... too busy with cattle rustlers ...
1775? how old are you?
 
In 1776? ... this would have been Umpqua territory ... Robert Grey didn't sail up the Columbia River until 1792, which is generally considered the first European (actually an American) to land in the Pacific Northwest ... so I don't know ...

But killing your wife instead of divorce was still practiced in rural Brazil in the 1960's ... perhaps later ... I guess it was just prosecutorial discretion back then in Oregon ... too busy with cattle rustlers ...
Love that backpedaling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top