colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Why don’t you tell your buddy here:You are the moron buying what Comey is selling.Your colleague dragged him into this, not me.Comey said?That’s not true. Comey said they received plenty of information to assess the source of the hack.Really? how do the know they were examining data from the actual server? How do you know they didn't just make it all up?Mueller isn’t a technical expert but he certainly hasn’t many technical experts working for him.Mueller didn't even know what was in his own report much less understand firewall protocols. None of the 17 three letter agencies were ever given the server to analyze. The lamestream media claimed the consensus was based on expert examination of the server in question.I don't want his bullshit. I want to see the actual documents and data. Mueller can make all the claims he wants, but they don't prove shit without hard data.The Mueller explains what they looked at. The malware was taken off the servers. They had logs from ISPs to show the data traffic.The actual evidence the FBI looked at to make its claims. Of course, we both know there is no such evidence. Mueller pulled a fast one. He plain out lied.What were you looking for exactly?Nope. Mueller's unsupported claims (his report) are proof of nothing. And that's all an indictment is: proof of nothing. That's why we have trials.Show us the proof they did what you claim.You don’t know what you’re talking about and Bill Binney didn’t lay it all out. He breaks codes but he doesn’t know much about cyber security.You want to go? Because there’s not a doubt in my mind I know more about this than you.I love bitch slapping you you uneducated sheep. You download an email, theres a marker stating so. Those marks weren’t there. Amount of data and the timeframe given proved it was not possible for an outside source to do this. Period. Proven. Undeniable no matter how much you cry. USB? That would be an inside job you moron. Like a thumb drive. You truly are a grade 1 fool.
The transfer speeds you’re referring to were derived from metadata. There is no evidence to support a conclusion that the file transfer referenced in that metadata was the transfer from the DNC server to storage media. In fact, there’s evidence to the contrary.
That transfer occurred on July 5th. The last DNC email was from late May. In reality, the data transfer you’re referencing occurred well after the server was hacked.
It wasn't hacked at all. William Binney laid it out perfectly and the man has broken more code than just about any one else alive. When the owner of Crowdstrike was put under oath, he could not say with any certainty that the server was hacked, much less "pinpoint" who may have done it. They were given a limited amount of data that would not have stood up to scrutiny in a court of law. What you also lack the understanding of is that security breaches will be detected by even mediocre firewall software and the I.T guys will be alerted to shut down the server. Downloading e-mails on the other side of a firewall in mere minutes to a device.....like a thumb-drive?
The FBI forensics analyzed the malware. They checked data logs. They traced the data moving off the servers to another site. The myth of the thumb drive is no different than your myth that the FBI had Rich’s laptop. Baseless
The hardware isn’t very relevant. It’s not like they’re dusting it for fingerprints. The evidence is the data which the FBI and intelligence agencies did examine.
Comey testified under oath that the FBI never had access to the DNC server nor any data sets and accepted the report from the Ukranians.
Comey testified under oath that the FBI never had access to the DNC server nor any data sets and accepted the report from the Ukranians.