Admit it: GOP has no plans to help anyone except the rich and corporations

It will make the people independent of government and you. When the people no longer need government, you and the left will become obsolete.

But that is what your fighting to prevent, isn't it?

Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.
 
It will make the people independent of government and you. When the people no longer need government, you and the left will become obsolete.

But that is what your fighting to prevent, isn't it?

Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.

and when they are done with "those evil RICH" they will come after you..we the working people (taxpayers) are going to soon be outnumbered by those sucking off us...so get prepared
 
Last edited:
If there is one thing I would actually call the redistribution of wealth it is the unregulated stock market and banking businesses. When you allow them to make shitty loans to themselves in order to make bullshit businesses, and then pitch those bullshit businesses and investments that buy up crappy loans so the poor people pay for the banks to hand money over to the rich who will never pay it back, that is blatantly funneling the savings and retirement of the poor and middle class to the rich. When you have companies like Bain Capital who buy up smaller and competitive businesses, sell off any profitable assets to their rich business friends, and then tank the competitive smaller businesses so the rich businesses do not have competition that is redistribution of wealth from small and mid level businesses to the rich.

Giving some person with no money 200 dollars in food, some assistance making the rent and paying for utilities like electricity and heat, and medical care that consists of the cheapest solutions like pain killers to make your death a little more comfortable instead of actual cures is not redistribution of wealth. That is called giving the poor just enough so they do not rise up and kill the rich people. No one got rich because of welfare. Hell, you are not even allowed to have your own bank account or assets like land you could sell if you want welfare.

The redistribution of wealth said to exist by the republicans is a huge lie with no basis in reality. The real redistribution of wealth has been proven by the growing difference in wealth between the lower and middle class and the shrinking number of exceptionally wealthy people. I cannot even believe despite the fact numbers show the wealthy are getting fewer and more wealthy and the poor are getting more numerous and poorer that anyone with two neurons to rub together could even buy the load of crap the republicans shovel in this regard without their brain burrowing out of their ears. It is amazing how stupid republicans can be in ignoring the obvious.

Wow...clueless.....

The Warren court, he said, failed to “break free from the essential constraints” in the U.S. Constitution and launch a major redistribution of wealth. But Obama, then an Illinois state lawmaker, said the legislative branch of government, rather than the courts, probably was the ideal avenue for accomplishing that goal.

But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

Obama rips U.S. Constitution

You abjectly dismissed fraulein.

So tell me mr. smarty pants, if the redistribution of the wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich is so wrong, then why is the money flowing that way?

You can parrot whatever excuse your spoonfeeders give you, but numbers don't lie. Feel free to be as ignorant as you are now and to ignore facts. I can already survive on my own without the trappings of society. It is only the useless puppets who feel the republicansd give a shit about them that will face the wrath of the revolution when the republicans force the poor to fight for their dinner. The dems are not much better, but at least they know poor people dependant on the government for their next meal are far less likely to revolt and bring the system down.

When they come to take your shit perhaps you should shout your fox rhetoric and lies at them. It might make a couple of them laugh while they gut you, and laughter is a true gift to the world.
 
It will make the people independent of government and you. When the people no longer need government, you and the left will become obsolete.

But that is what your fighting to prevent, isn't it?

Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.
It is a HUGE problem for Republicans and any conservative. Those dependent upon government for survive MUST be taught self sufficiency and give proper incentive to move away from government substance into the private sector.

If they have to work two jobs, then they do. However, at the current rate of decline, the government will not be able to support this country for much longer.

As for the poor rising up to kill the rich.....I think that they'll just be fodder for government Princes's and the government aristocracy. Government won't just go down. They'll become a strong, tyrannical centralized authority.

when that happens, the left will realize their dream of equality...in the sweat shops, laboring for the elite.
 
It will make the people independent of government and you. When the people no longer need government, you and the left will become obsolete.

But that is what your fighting to prevent, isn't it?

Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.

and when they are done with "those evil RICH" they will come after you..

Are you kidding, who do you think is going to be leading the charge for the rich? That was funny. I should side with the republicans because after the poor kill the rich they may turn upon me, so I should be a slave and support my masters? If that is your plan then go for it, I think I will join the revolution if it comes in my lifetime.
 
If there is one thing I would actually call the redistribution of wealth it is the unregulated stock market and banking businesses. When you allow them to make shitty loans to themselves in order to make bullshit businesses, and then pitch those bullshit businesses and investments that buy up crappy loans so the poor people pay for the banks to hand money over to the rich who will never pay it back, that is blatantly funneling the savings and retirement of the poor and middle class to the rich. When you have companies like Bain Capital who buy up smaller and competitive businesses, sell off any profitable assets to their rich business friends, and then tank the competitive smaller businesses so the rich businesses do not have competition that is redistribution of wealth from small and mid level businesses to the rich.

Giving some person with no money 200 dollars in food, some assistance making the rent and paying for utilities like electricity and heat, and medical care that consists of the cheapest solutions like pain killers to make your death a little more comfortable instead of actual cures is not redistribution of wealth. That is called giving the poor just enough so they do not rise up and kill the rich people. No one got rich because of welfare. Hell, you are not even allowed to have your own bank account or assets like land you could sell if you want welfare.

The redistribution of wealth said to exist by the republicans is a huge lie with no basis in reality. The real redistribution of wealth has been proven by the growing difference in wealth between the lower and middle class and the shrinking number of exceptionally wealthy people. I cannot even believe despite the fact numbers show the wealthy are getting fewer and more wealthy and the poor are getting more numerous and poorer that anyone with two neurons to rub together could even buy the load of crap the republicans shovel in this regard without their brain burrowing out of their ears. It is amazing how stupid republicans can be in ignoring the obvious.

Wow...clueless.....

The Warren court, he said, failed to “break free from the essential constraints” in the U.S. Constitution and launch a major redistribution of wealth. But Obama, then an Illinois state lawmaker, said the legislative branch of government, rather than the courts, probably was the ideal avenue for accomplishing that goal.

But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

Obama rips U.S. Constitution

You abjectly dismissed fraulein.

So tell me mr. smarty pants, if the redistribution of the wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich is so wrong, then why is the money flowing that way?

You can parrot whatever excuse your spoonfeeders give you, but numbers don't lie. Feel free to be as ignorant as you are now and to ignore facts. I can already survive on my own without the trappings of society. It is only the useless puppets who feel the republicansd give a shit about them that will face the wrath of the revolution when the republicans force the poor to fight for their dinner. The dems are not much better, but at least they know poor people dependant on the government for their next meal are far less likely to revolt and bring the system down.

When they come to take your shit perhaps you should shout your fox rhetoric and lies at them. It might make a couple of them laugh while they gut you, and laughter is a true gift to the world.
I marvel at the ability of the left to regurgitate what is fed to them.

It is NOT a zero sum game. The wealth does not flow only one way and I just love how the progressives want to attack the only vehicle that exists that can provide for the people a means to educate their kids and create a comfortable retirement.

But that must be stopped because it is not given at the hands of government, so it must be wrong!!

The horror......the horror.....
 
If there is one thing I would actually call the redistribution of wealth it is the unregulated stock market and banking businesses. When you allow them to make shitty loans to themselves in order to make bullshit businesses, and then pitch those bullshit businesses and investments that buy up crappy loans so the poor people pay for the banks to hand money over to the rich who will never pay it back, that is blatantly funneling the savings and retirement of the poor and middle class to the rich. When you have companies like Bain Capital who buy up smaller and competitive businesses, sell off any profitable assets to their rich business friends, and then tank the competitive smaller businesses so the rich businesses do not have competition that is redistribution of wealth from small and mid level businesses to the rich.

Giving some person with no money 200 dollars in food, some assistance making the rent and paying for utilities like electricity and heat, and medical care that consists of the cheapest solutions like pain killers to make your death a little more comfortable instead of actual cures is not redistribution of wealth. That is called giving the poor just enough so they do not rise up and kill the rich people. No one got rich because of welfare. Hell, you are not even allowed to have your own bank account or assets like land you could sell if you want welfare.

The redistribution of wealth said to exist by the republicans is a huge lie with no basis in reality. The real redistribution of wealth has been proven by the growing difference in wealth between the lower and middle class and the shrinking number of exceptionally wealthy people. I cannot even believe despite the fact numbers show the wealthy are getting fewer and more wealthy and the poor are getting more numerous and poorer that anyone with two neurons to rub together could even buy the load of crap the republicans shovel in this regard without their brain burrowing out of their ears. It is amazing how stupid republicans can be in ignoring the obvious.

Wow...clueless.....

The Warren court, he said, failed to “break free from the essential constraints” in the U.S. Constitution and launch a major redistribution of wealth. But Obama, then an Illinois state lawmaker, said the legislative branch of government, rather than the courts, probably was the ideal avenue for accomplishing that goal.

But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

Obama rips U.S. Constitution

You abjectly dismissed fraulein.

So tell me mr. smarty pants, if the redistribution of the wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich is so wrong, then why is the money flowing that way?

You can parrot whatever excuse your spoonfeeders give you, but numbers don't lie. Feel free to be as ignorant as you are now and to ignore facts. I can already survive on my own without the trappings of society. It is only the useless puppets who feel the republicansd give a shit about them that will face the wrath of the revolution when the republicans force the poor to fight for their dinner. The dems are not much better, but at least they know poor people dependant on the government for their next meal are far less likely to revolt and bring the system down.

When they come to take your shit perhaps you should shout your fox rhetoric and lies at them. It might make a couple of them laugh while they gut you, and laughter is a true gift to the world.

Look honey, I just showed you where Bammy himself wants to "redistribute" the wealth, just say thank you and move on.

When you come to take my shit, bring guns, you'll need them.

You have been shown to be uneducated....it probably hurts, but you'll be ok.
 
Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.

and when they are done with "those evil RICH" they will come after you..

Are you kidding, who do you think is going to be leading the charge for the rich? That was funny. I should side with the republicans because after the poor kill the rich they may turn upon me, so I should be a slave and support my masters? If that is your plan then go for it, I think I will join the revolution if it comes in my lifetime.
LOL

It won't be the poor killing the rich.....It won't be anyone killing anyone. The poor won't have the freedom to go kill someone. They'll be to busy slaving away for the ruling class in the government.
 
Come on USMB right wingers, admit it. Just come out and admit it. The GOP has no plans to help anyone except the rich and corporations.

We know what they want to do to the:

Poor
Middle Class
Women
Minorities
Unemployed
Elderly

It's not about about "redistribution of wealth, but about resource organization. Besides, the wealth has already been "redistributed" to the "needy" top 1%.

But how will what they want to do actually help the country?

Negged.
 
It will make the people independent of government and you. When the people no longer need government, you and the left will become obsolete.

But that is what your fighting to prevent, isn't it?

Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.
It is a HUGE problem for Republicans and any conservative. Those dependent upon government for survive MUST be taught self sufficiency and give proper incentive to move away from government substance into the private sector.

If they have to work two jobs, then they do. However, at the current rate of decline, the government will not be able to support this country for much longer.

As for the poor rising up to kill the rich.....I think that they'll just be fodder for government Princes's and the government aristocracy. Government won't just go down. They'll become a strong, tyrannical centralized authority.

when that happens, the left will realize their dream of equality...in the sweat shops, laboring for the elite.

Way to ignore who is actively trying to destroy the government and who really likes Americans working for an ever diminishing ration of chicken feed. Republicanism is a race to the bottom with third world sweatshops, whoever thought it was a good idea for American workers to compete directly with them was no liberal.
 
Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.

and when they are done with "those evil RICH" they will come after you..

Are you kidding, who do you think is going to be leading the charge for the rich? That was funny. I should side with the republicans because after the poor kill the rich they may turn upon me, so I should be a slave and support my masters? If that is your plan then go for it, I think I will join the revolution if it comes in my lifetime.

The only side you should take, is your own..don't forget the revolution is coming because of you bleeding heart liberals...you've had a hand in "enslaving" a whole new CLASS of people.....you must feel proud
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
Come on USMB right wingers, admit it. Just come out and admit it. The GOP has no plans to help anyone except the rich and corporations.

We know what they want to do to the:

Poor
Middle Class
Women
Minorities
Unemployed
Elderly

It's not about about "redistribution of wealth, but about resource organization. Besides, the wealth has already been "redistributed" to the "needy" top 1%.

But how will what they want to do actually help the country?
Having to be self-reliant scares the living shit out of you, doesn't it?

Man, what a sissy bedwetter you are.
 
Can't spell trickle down without "trick".

Well now, aren't you brilliant?
Can't spell democrat without "rat". <---- Look, that is just as dumb as the quoted post.

Yes but it was at least on topic and relevant to the discussion. The joke was on people such as yourself who watched as our future prosperity trickled to China while praising the free market.
Not my fault you majored in a field that makes you feel good about yourself but prepares you only for a career in fast food.
 
Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.
It is a HUGE problem for Republicans and any conservative. Those dependent upon government for survive MUST be taught self sufficiency and give proper incentive to move away from government substance into the private sector.

If they have to work two jobs, then they do. However, at the current rate of decline, the government will not be able to support this country for much longer.

As for the poor rising up to kill the rich.....I think that they'll just be fodder for government Princes's and the government aristocracy. Government won't just go down. They'll become a strong, tyrannical centralized authority.

when that happens, the left will realize their dream of equality...in the sweat shops, laboring for the elite.

Way to ignore who is actively trying to destroy the government and who really likes Americans working for an ever diminishing ration of chicken feed. Republicanism is a race to the bottom with third world sweatshops, whoever thought it was a good idea for American workers to compete directly with them was no liberal.
An ever diminishing ration of chicken? I'm thinking that your delusional. That ever diminishing ration of chicken as you put it, is government strangling the life out of our country and economy. Under no other system but capitalism, has mankind increased the level of living in the world. Now that level is declining.

Ask yourself this. Longevity (Life expectancy), prosperity and dreams, throughout history, have declined and suffered under a strong centralized government.

Why in the hell would anyone want to emulate it again? Ever?
 
Yeah, but when the poor can no longer depend on the government for food, and there are no jobs for them to have, they are not going to just lie down and die. No, what they will do is rise up and kill the rich. It has happened many times before. Welfare is not giving the poor riches, it is simply keeping them dependent on the government which should be a huge concern to the republicans because if the government is no longer useful to the poor in feeding them they will get food. Then you have to ask yourself where is the food and money?

Worse yet is that the poor are the ones who are in the armed forces, and who often take jobs as cops. Who is going to protect your riches when the poor need food? I doubt severely that whiny ass winthrop the third is going to stop too many poor hungry people with his incessant whining for his daddy to keep him out of the war in their backyard.

Either keep the poor dependent on the government for their next meal or get ready for revolution.
It is a HUGE problem for Republicans and any conservative. Those dependent upon government for survive MUST be taught self sufficiency and give proper incentive to move away from government substance into the private sector.

If they have to work two jobs, then they do. However, at the current rate of decline, the government will not be able to support this country for much longer.

As for the poor rising up to kill the rich.....I think that they'll just be fodder for government Princes's and the government aristocracy. Government won't just go down. They'll become a strong, tyrannical centralized authority.

when that happens, the left will realize their dream of equality...in the sweat shops, laboring for the elite.

Way to ignore who is actively trying to destroy the government and who really likes Americans working for an ever diminishing ration of chicken feed. Republicanism is a race to the bottom with third world sweatshops, whoever thought it was a good idea for American workers to compete directly with them was no liberal.

You want more, earn it pissant....you get nothing more from me.
 
Apparently if the country isn't inhabited by people who are 100% self-sufficient, the GOP platform won't work.

Step AWAY from the Yellow Tail....

The social safety nets will be disbanded under a real "conservative" government. So if you can't support yourself, apparently there is nothing else built into the system to lend itself toward your support. This is the goal of the GOP.
No; that's the leftist fear-mongering fantasy version of what the GOP wants.

We don't object to the safety net. We object to the hammock.
 
No one has ever been able to explain why barely middle class people are bending over for the 1%.
I suppose I would have to see proof that anyone is bending over for anyone else, except the taxpayer who is not only bent over, but in the Stocks while the left throw garbage at them.
 
"help" to a liberal is government $ to the moocher class currently borrowed from the Chinese and soon to be stolen from our kids and grandkids.
 

Forum List

Back
Top