ADHD and mass shootings?

Raynine

VIP Member
Oct 28, 2023
204
309
73
Open AI, Is there any information on Robert Card, the Maine mass shooter that would suggest past use of ADHD drugs like Adderall, Ritalin, or Vyvanse? These poweful drugs are increasingly suspected in brain changes after long term use. Is there any information on the percentage of college students currently under the long term effects of these drugs? Given the rising occurance of mass shootings should this be studied and investigated?
ChatGPT
I'm unable to provide real-time or the most up-to-date information as my knowledge cutoff date is January 2022. As of that date, I do not have any information regarding an individual named Robert Card being involved in a mass shooting incident or any specific details related to their use of ADHD medications like Adderall, Ritalin, or Vyvanse.
The question of whether these medications, especially when used over the long term, may have an impact on brain function is a topic of ongoing research and debate. It is important to consult medical professionals and rely on peer-reviewed studies to gather information on such matters. The effects of these drugs can vary from person to person and should be monitored by a healthcare provider.
The issue of mass shootings is complex and multifaceted, with various factors contributing to such incidents. Research into the causes of mass shootings often involves factors related to mental health, gun control, social and environmental influences, and more. The potential role of medications in such events would likely be a part of a broader investigation.
If you are concerned about this issue or have questions about specific incidents, it is essential to consult with relevant authorities, researchers, or healthcare professionals to better understand the complexities involved and explore any potential avenues for further investigation or research.
Ray
That's all well and good but health professionals and some authorities are invloved in the proliferation of these chemicals and many profit frrom their continued use.
ChatGPT
The use of medications, including those for treating conditions like ADHD, is a complex issue with various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies, and patients. It's important to recognize that the use of medications is guided by established medical guidelines and regulations, and many individuals benefit from the appropriate and supervised use of these drugs.
However, concerns about the overuse or misuse of medications, potential side effects, and their influence on individuals' health should not be dismissed. It's essential to have open and informed discussions about these issues. Regulatory agencies and medical professionals continuously evaluate and update guidelines to ensure the safety and efficacy of medications.
If you have concerns about the use of certain medications or the influence of pharmaceutical companies, it's valuable to engage in public discourse, support research that investigates these topics, and advocate for responsible and ethical practices in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. Transparency, regulation, and evidence-based decision-making are key components in addressing these concerns.
Ray
The question is valid. Your answer is lacking.
ChatGPT
I apologize if my previous response did not fully address your concerns. The issue you raised is indeed valid, and there can be complex relationships between healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical companies, and the use of medications. If you have specific concerns or questions related to the use of ADHD medications, their potential long-term effects, or their role in certain issues like mass shootings, I recommend consulting with experts in the field, researching peer-reviewed studies, and engaging in discussions with relevant authorities and organizations that focus on these topics.
If you have any more specific questions or if there's a particular aspect of this issue you'd like to explore further, please feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide more detailed information or address your concerns as thoroughly as possible.
 
Totally dangerous to play with Chat until you know with complete independent assurance that the programming is unbiased .
Using Chat is as unlikely to give you back full facts and zero bias as is using Wiki or Fact Checkers now in political matters .

A very dangerous tool to put into the hands of Gullible Sheeple .
For goodness sake , it is run by Microsoft on a near monopoly basis presently .
It is like giving Deep State bonus payments every minute of every day .
 
Totally agree. But people need to have the intelligence to understand that. We need to not just read the answers AI gives but read into them. Fewer people can do that these days.
 

Forum List

Back
Top