A "Tale of Two "LIES"???

[jon_berzerk]

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

Which ones?

terrorist ones

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

 

[Camp]

Here is the Mother of All Lies as issued by President Bush. This is the anchor, the foundation and beginning of the scam that led us to war in Iraq. Without it, the American people would not have supported the war. It was this lie that the following lies by the administration were based on and dependent on. It was made live, in front of the nation and world. It was televised and broadcast around the world. It was called the STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS. In it Bush stated that Saddam aided and protected terrorist, including al Qaeda.

Where is the evidence that Saddam aided and protected al Qaeda. Unless evidence can be produced, confirmation of Bush lying to promote the war in Iraq is confirmed as fact. There simply is no debate. Every other debating point is irrelevant. No aid or protection equals a lie being told. Bush connected Saddam and Iraq to al Qaeda. Busted.

youtube.com/watch?v=jTpZYH2x9-k

 

[Brain357]

Which ones?

terrorist ones

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

 

[jon_berzerk]

terrorist ones

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

 

[BlindBoo]

speaking of Blix

i can remember the guy in the news all the time

in one set of news footage he took the cap off a shell tip

and sniffed it

i remember thinking oh brother what have we gotten into

--LOL

i wish i could find the footage

Did you know this about Hans Blix?

In January 2002, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, one of the major architects of the war in Iraq, in an unusual move, asked the Central Intelligence Agency to investigate the performance of Swedish diplomat and former UN Weapons Inspector Hans Blix while he headed the International Atomic Energy Agency from 1981 to 1997. Wolfowitz was hoping the CIA would find evidence he could use to discredit Blix for failing to find an active nuclear weapons program in Iraq during IAEA inspections there. Wolfowitz asked the CIA to investigate Blix a month before UN weapons inspectors were gearing up to return to Iraq for the first time since 1998. At the time, Wolfowitz and other hawks in the Bush administration feared that renewed inspections in Iraq would undermine their overall goal to launch a military campaign against Iraq.

CRG

doesnt make any sense

since wmd was not the only reason to rid saddam

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

In Palestine and Iran. Not in the authorization.

 

[Brain357]

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

Link?

Been a lot more killed than that since the war started.

 

[jon_berzerk]

speaking of Blix

i can remember the guy in the news all the time

in one set of news footage he took the cap off a shell tip

and sniffed it

i remember thinking oh brother what have we gotten into

--LOL

i wish i could find the footage

Did you know this about Hans Blix?

In January 2002, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, one of the major architects of the war in Iraq, in an unusual move, asked the Central Intelligence Agency to investigate the performance of Swedish diplomat and former UN Weapons Inspector Hans Blix while he headed the International Atomic Energy Agency from 1981 to 1997. Wolfowitz was hoping the CIA would find evidence he could use to discredit Blix for failing to find an active nuclear weapons program in Iraq during IAEA inspections there. Wolfowitz asked the CIA to investigate Blix a month before UN weapons inspectors were gearing up to return to Iraq for the first time since 1998. At the time, Wolfowitz and other hawks in the Bush administration feared that renewed inspections in Iraq would undermine their overall goal to launch a military campaign against Iraq.

CRG

doesnt make any sense

since wmd was not the only reason to rid saddam

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

In Palestine and Iran. Not in the authorization.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

Link?

Been a lot more killed than that since the war started.

speaking of Blix

i can remember the guy in the news all the time

in one set of news footage he took the cap off a shell tip

and sniffed it

i remember thinking oh brother what have we gotten into

--LOL

i wish i could find the footage

Did you know this about Hans Blix?

In January 2002, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, one of the major architects of the war in Iraq, in an unusual move, asked the Central Intelligence Agency to investigate the performance of Swedish diplomat and former UN Weapons Inspector Hans Blix while he headed the International Atomic Energy Agency from 1981 to 1997. Wolfowitz was hoping the CIA would find evidence he could use to discredit Blix for failing to find an active nuclear weapons program in Iraq during IAEA inspections there. Wolfowitz asked the CIA to investigate Blix a month before UN weapons inspectors were gearing up to return to Iraq for the first time since 1998. At the time, Wolfowitz and other hawks in the Bush administration feared that renewed inspections in Iraq would undermine their overall goal to launch a military campaign against Iraq.

CRG

doesnt make any sense

since wmd was not the only reason to rid saddam

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

In Palestine and Iran. Not in the authorization.

Funding of Terrorism

Not only did Saddam provide training and support to terrorists, Saddam readily financed them.

Saddam was financing the EIJ from at least 1990 and after based on the letter drafted by the Office of the President of the Republic -- Secretary (Extract 12). A specific example is a memo that was "drafted in Saddam's office, it refers to an agreement with Islamic terrorists to conduct operations against the Egyptian regime during the first Gulf War (1991) and for continued financial support for the terrorists after hostilities ended.

Articles Saddam and al-Qaeda

 

[BlindBoo]

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

Which ones?

terrorist ones

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

Who do you think believes Saddam was not a very very bad person?

The terrorist he supported were limited to Palestine and Iran. He did not provide support to al Qeada.

All Arab nations support the Palestinian fund which pays out the death benefits to all victims of the occupation. They don't exclude the family of the S'Bers.

None of those are reasons Congress gave President Bush to decide upon.

 

[jon_berzerk]

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

Link?

Been a lot more killed than that since the war started.

kdp.se

 

[BlindBoo]

Very specific.

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

He was a very bad man. But he did it with the knowledge and support from the Raygun administration who continued aiding Saddam with out a peep about it.

 

[Brain357]

Did you know this about Hans Blix?

CRG

doesnt make any sense

since wmd was not the only reason to rid saddam

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

In Palestine and Iran. Not in the authorization.

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

Link?

Been a lot more killed than that since the war started.

Did you know this about Hans Blix?

CRG

doesnt make any sense

since wmd was not the only reason to rid saddam

Without WMD Iraq would not be a threat to the USA. That threat was one of two criteria Congress set for the president to decide on. The other was of course participation in 9-11.

saddam was a state supporter of terrorism

In Palestine and Iran. Not in the authorization.

Funding of Terrorism

Not only did Saddam provide training and support to terrorists, Saddam readily financed them.

Saddam was financing the EIJ from at least 1990 and after based on the letter drafted by the Office of the President of the Republic -- Secretary (Extract 12). A specific example is a memo that was "drafted in Saddam's office, it refers to an agreement with Islamic terrorists to conduct operations against the Egyptian regime during the first Gulf War (1991) and for continued financial support for the terrorists after hostilities ended.

Articles Saddam and al-Qaeda

And EIJ did what?

 

[g5000]

I have never heard anyone anywhere ever say, "If I knew the attack on Benghazi was a planned attack rather than over the video, I would have voted for Romney instead of Obama."

It is an entirely bogus premise that the outcome of the election was determined by "terrorist attack vs. video". It is one of the most retarded arguments out of a raft of retarded claims output by all of the bullshit manufacturers.

And it takes a special kind of retard to bleev it.

 

[jon_berzerk]

this has been gone over thousands and thousands of times

you folks can never seem to come to grasps that Saddam was a very very bad person

who sponsored terrorists

even payed the families of suicide bombers

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

He was a very bad man. But he did it with the knowledge and support from the Raygun administration who continued aiding Saddam with out a peep about it.

and that means what

 

[BlindBoo]

And compared to ISIS he doesn't look so bad. Was he being bad to people like ISIS?

Please link his terrorist connections.

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

He was a very bad man. But he did it with the knowledge and support from the Raygun administration who continued aiding Saddam with out a peep about it.

and that means what

He was our very bad man. However, that he did such things was not one of the two reasons President Bush had to use to base his decision on.

 

[Misty]

By your own posted definition, Republican CON$ervative BooB Woodward is a liar.
Case closed.

so now Woodward is a republican.

He is registered as a democrat.

 

[Roadrunner]

The invasion and occupation of Iraq and the removal of Saddam created an entirely new paradigm in that region.

This includes opening to the door for Iran to expand its influence (both overtly and covertly) and the advent of new terror groups.

Before our invasion of that sovereign country there was at least a measure of geopolitical balance. Now there is anarchy.

.

Same with Libya, Syria and maybe Egypt.

 

[Roadrunner]

By your own posted definition, Republican CON$ervative BooB Woodward is a liar.
Case closed.

so now Woodward is a republican.

He is registered as a democrat.

Gee, was the cynic being sarcastic???

 

[jon_berzerk]

isis is bad as well

there are many terrorists

ISIS is worse. Seems like saddam held them down and Iran. Bet he wouldn't let them get a nuke.

Link to these connections.

saddam killed over 100 thousand of his ow\n with chemical weapons

He was a very bad man. But he did it with the knowledge and support from the Raygun administration who continued aiding Saddam with out a peep about it.

and that means what

He was our very bad man. However, that he did such things was not one of the two reasons President Bush had to use to base his decision on.

there was more then two reasons

 

[edthecynic]

By your own posted definition, Republican CON$ervative BooB Woodward is a liar.
Case closed.

so now Woodward is a republican.

He is registered as a democrat.

So he claims, but his partner revealed the truth in their book, thus showing yet again what a lying hack Woodhead is!

“Woodward, a registered Republican, did not vote. He couldn't decide whether he was more uneasy with the disorganization and naïve idealism of McGovern's campaign or with Richard Nixon's conduct. And he believed that not voting enabled him to be more objective in reporting on Watergate - a view Bernstein regarded as silly. Bernstein voted for McGovern, unenthusiastically and unhesitatingly, then bet in the office pool that Nixon would win with 54 percent.
― Carl Bernstein, All the President's Men, Page 200

 

[healthmyths]

I have never heard anyone anywhere ever say, "If I knew the attack on Benghazi was a planned attack rather than over the video, I would have voted for Romney instead of Obama."

It is an entirely bogus premise that the outcome of the election was determined by "terrorist attack vs. video". It is one of the most retarded arguments out of a raft of retarded claims output by all of the bullshit manufacturers.

And it takes a special kind of retard to bleev it.

Yup right up the same kind of retard that believes GWB liberated Iraq because Saddam tried to kill his Dad.
Or better right up with same kind of retard that insists GWB planted C-4 in WTC and set them off.
Or better yet.. how about when Bush let the bin Laden family fly out of the US when ALL other planes were grounded."

Takes a really special retard to believe the above... but retards like that don't even KNOW
how truly dumb they are!
The have a leader that has TOLD THEM POINT BLANK...how to fool them...i.e. YOU!
From his book..
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves."
And then after you voted for him TWICE he laughs in your face by hiring the guy who says that
you and others like you make up the "Stupidity of the American Voter"!
Think about that if you can... your leader telling YOU POINT blank he has fooled you and he hires
a guy who labels people like you even further as "Stupidity"!

Keep bringing up your RETARDED believes!