A question for neocons on this board

Many neocons lie as to what they are, just as communists did, or even better than Judas lied.

Here is something for you liars. "Neoconservatism is a political philosophy that emerged in the United States of America, and which supports using American economic and military power to bring liberalism, democracy, and human rights to other countries.[1][2][3] In economics, unlike traditionalist conservatives, neoconservatives are generally comfortable with a welfare state; and, while rhetorically supportive of free markets, they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes.[4]"
Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In other words, they pretend to free-market and diplomatic conservatism, when in fact they are big government internationalists and interventionists. Their policies from 2001 to 2006 nearly brought the US to its knees by late last fall until the American public regained its senses and threw them out of office.
Wikipedia at one time did have a decent description of the neocon philosophy.

Unfortunately, the libtards can participate in writing entries, too.

Read a few books and some works from neocons on the philosophy and get a clue.

You gotta do more than give your opinion to discount the posting, si modo. You know that, and you know that you can't refute what I have posted.

Here is another for you from the Christian Science Monitor titled "Neocon 101 Some basic questions answered." This objective article is found at US News / Special: Empire Builders / Neocon 101 | Christian Science Monitor
 
Many neocons lie as to what they are, just as communists did, or even better than Judas lied.

Here is something for you liars. "Neoconservatism is a political philosophy that emerged in the United States of America, and which supports using American economic and military power to bring liberalism, democracy, and human rights to other countries.[1][2][3] In economics, unlike traditionalist conservatives, neoconservatives are generally comfortable with a welfare state; and, while rhetorically supportive of free markets, they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes.[4]"
Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In other words, they pretend to free-market and diplomatic conservatism, when in fact they are big government internationalists and interventionists. Their policies from 2001 to 2006 nearly brought the US to its knees by late last fall until the American public regained its senses and threw them out of office.
Wikipedia at one time did have a decent description of the neocon philosophy.

Unfortunately, the libtards can participate in writing entries, too.

Read a few books and some works from neocons on the philosophy and get a clue.

You gotta do more than give your opinion to discount the posting, si modo. You know that, and you know that you can't refute what I have posted.

Here is another for you from the Christian Science Monitor titled "Neocon 101 Some basic questions answered." This objective article is found at US News / Special: Empire Builders / Neocon 101 | Christian Science Monitor
Morons rarely know when the contradict themselves in subsequent posts.

But, I must be lying about that, too.

Sometimes you amuse, but mostly you are just an assclown.
 
If there were drugs that could "cure" you of neoconservatism, that is, a medication that was effective in recalibrating the chemical process that leads to close-minded nationalism, racism, classism and war-mongering, would you take it?

I recognize that the Christians have failed miserably in their WWJD programs, but I wonder if science held forth such a "solution" (If some would considered it a solution) would you opt for it?

I dont know about a drug, but there is a procedure to get rid of all the thought processes that make one a conservative.
It's called a lobotomy.
It must be popular because I see a lot liberals around and they all have had them.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
What's a "neocon"?

Oh, wow, let me help.

If can use the following words interchangeably to describe our president, but don't know what they mean:

Fascist
Nazi
Communist
Racist
Socialist

If you want more wars.

If you believe that Iraq is a success.

If you believe that only rich people create jobs.

If you believe that Fox news is "fair and balanced".

If you believe that science is a "faith".

If you believe that religion is an alternative to science.

If you believe the Noah's Ark is a historical event.

If you believe that Sarah Palin is "smart".

If you believed that George Bush and John McCain were "smart".

If you hate gays, blacks, feminists, Hispanics and other "non Americans".

If you are against government run health care but love Medicare and Medicaid.

If you believe torture worked.

If you agree with all these things, then you are a right wing neo-con.

Well, according to those constraints I imagine that there must only be one...maybe two..."neocons" in our country.

So why is everybody so upset over these 2 guys? Leave them alone.

Yea, just two.

One is named "Republican",

and the other is named, "Party".
 
I'm not even sure WHAT a Neo-con is. Apparently, anytime anyone says anything that a Liberal disagrees with, that speaker is a neo con. It seems that if a Liberal calls someone a neo con, that about the worst thing a person can be called.

Any response after that label is applied is not heard because it was issued by a neo con and not worthy of being heard.

A Neo-con is a politically correct name to call a jew without being labeled an anti-semite.

I generally refer to Jews as Semites.
 
I just said religion does not have anything to do with it. geez!
I know Luissa. So sorry. I edited to change it so that it didn't look like I was accusing you. More the OP's rhetoric is ignorant.
it's cool!:razz:
and Mani was just doing a spoof on another thread that asked if you were homosexual would you take a pill to cure that.

I'm pretty sure that if a "gay" gene were discovered, Republicans would drop opposition to abortion. No, not pretty sure, positive.
 
What's a "neocon"?

Oh, wow, let me help.

If can use the following words interchangeably to describe our president, but don't know what they mean:

Fascist
Nazi
Communist
Racist
Socialist

If you want more wars.

If you believe that Iraq is a success.

If you believe that only rich people create jobs.

If you believe that Fox news is "fair and balanced".

If you believe that science is a "faith".

If you believe that religion is an alternative to science.

If you believe the Noah's Ark is a historical event.

If you believe that Sarah Palin is "smart".

If you believed that George Bush and John McCain were "smart".

If you hate gays, blacks, feminists, Hispanics and other "non Americans".

If you are against government run health care but love Medicare and Medicaid.

If you believe torture worked.

If you agree with all these things, then you are a right wing neo-con.

Well, according to those constraints I imagine that there must only be one...maybe two..."neocons" in our country.

So why is everybody so upset over these 2 guys? Leave them alone.

Yea, just two.

One is named "Republican",

and the other is named, "Party".

cluepon.jpg
 
If there were drugs that could "cure" you of neoconservatism, that is, a medication that was effective in recalibrating the chemical process that leads to close-minded nationalism, racism, classism and war-mongering, would you take it?

I recognize that the Christians have failed miserably in their WWJD programs, but I wonder if science held forth such a "solution" (If some would considered it a solution) would you opt for it?

Tell us more Dr. Mengele....what's next, concentration camps for people you disagree with politically? What's your "Final Solution"?
 
Actually what we now call neocons were originally Scoop Jackson Democrats, or Reagan Democrats. Most of them have little to no problem with lots of social spending but are very very strong on national defense as Well.
 
Actually what we now call neocons were originally Scoop Jackson Democrats, or Reagan Democrats. Most of them have little to no problem with lots of social spending but are very very strong on national defense as Well.
Neocons know that social spending is not going anywhere - ever. It's an acceptance of reality rather than having little to no problem with it. Neocons DO expect that spending to be efficient and not to grow.
 
If it exist it will grow. It can't help itself. We have a Helium reserve remember? There is no government program so pathetic and pointless that is does not have it's champions.
 
I'm not even sure WHAT a Neo-con is. Apparently, anytime anyone says anything that a Liberal disagrees with, that speaker is a neo con. It seems that if a Liberal calls someone a neo con, that about the worst thing a person can be called.

Any response after that label is applied is not heard because it was issued by a neo con and not worthy of being heard.

A Neo-con is a politically correct name to call a jew without being labeled an anti-semite.


The persecution complex is a definite common factor between the neocons and the christian right. Wonder what those camps would do if they were truly persecuted?
 
Wikipedia at one time did have a decent description of the neocon philosophy.

Unfortunately, the libtards can participate in writing entries, too.

Read a few books and some works from neocons on the philosophy and get a clue.

You gotta do more than give your opinion to discount the posting, si modo. You know that, and you know that you can't refute what I have posted.

Here is another for you from the Christian Science Monitor titled "Neocon 101 Some basic questions answered." This objective article is found at US News / Special: Empire Builders / Neocon 101 | Christian Science Monitor
Morons rarely know when the contradict themselves in subsequent posts.

But, I must be lying about that, too.

Sometimes you amuse, but mostly you are just an assclown.

si modo, quit licking your own ass, and deal with the fact that I have quite succinctly (look it up) defined neo-conservatism. That you don't like it doesn't mean a thing. Until you address the issue, you are irrelevant here.

The neo-cons go hysterical when they are pinned, just as the KKK did. I believe the American people have as much generally as much respect for one group as they have for the other -- none.
 
Last edited:
You gotta do more than give your opinion to discount the posting, si modo. You know that, and you know that you can't refute what I have posted.

Here is another for you from the Christian Science Monitor titled "Neocon 101 Some basic questions answered." This objective article is found at US News / Special: Empire Builders / Neocon 101 | Christian Science Monitor
Morons rarely know when the contradict themselves in subsequent posts.

But, I must be lying about that, too.

Sometimes you amuse, but mostly you are just an assclown.

si modo, quit licking your own ass, and deal with the fact that I have quite succinctly (look it up) defined neo-conservatism. That you don't like it doesn't mean a thing. Until you address the issue, you are irrelevant here.

The neo-cons go hysterical when they are pinned, just as the KKK did. I believe the American people have as much generally as much respect for one group as they have for the other -- none.
LMAO! So, am I a neocon who is lying about being a neocon because, as you said, neocons lie about what they are? Or am I not lying about being a neocon, but since I am one, I must not be one because I am lying about it (as you said they lie about what they are)? :lol:

And, your assuming that I don't like what a neocon is, is hysterical.

What issue do you want addressed, Jake?
 

Forum List

Back
Top