I don't think you can be serious, either. Do you have an actual argument against this article?
I didn't think so.
Why is it that the cost of maintaining troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are counted as Bush expenses but not Obama expenses? That alone totally skews this comparison so badly as to make it useless.
Makes it useless? Obama had to continue these wars. It was Bush that started them.
Actually one could make the point that Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein "started them" but that's neither here nor there...correct me if I'm wrong, Billy but didn't Barack Obama increase troop levels in Afghanistan and dramatically increase the number of drone strikes against Al Queda leadership? Why is it again that you don't count the cost of that towards Barry?