- Apr 5, 2010
- 81,813
- 33,335
- 2,300
No, it isn't. its merely interpreting the results of the investigation.
By creating new evidence in an investigation in which he is recused.
re·cuse
riˈkyo͞oz/
verb
NORTH AMERICAN
- challenge (a judge, prosecutor, or juror) as unqualified to perform legal duties because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality.
of a judge) excuse oneself from a case because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality.
Neither imply that the recused can jump back in where they wish.
What new evidence? Again you don't even have the freaking memo, you are basing your opinions on "sources"
As an Engineer I hold things to higher standards. Actual documents, actual test results, actual observable events.
Yep, Nunes has shown his impartiality time and again.![]()
Since progressives have decided to weaponize government and the press, your calls for impartiality are total bullshit.
Relying solely on 'sources' I see.
Different situation. That is my opinion. The document we are waiting for is a source, and for all the talk you have done about it the one and only fact is that you DO NOT KNOW what is actually in it.