toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
I'm sorry, I don't have a link for this, I am taking this all from memory from a report I just watched on TV before I forget too much of it, but I was so compelled by the data presented that I took pictures of some of the more interesting graphs. Again, I apologize for the poor quality, but all of these pictures are handheld snapshots I took off my TV screen of freeze-framed stills on a channel with very poor video quality as the station broadcasts low quality streaming video taken from a podcast. I've processed the images for the best quality that could be taken from them as these charts were being shown on a wall in the background in a big room to a large crowd behind the person giving the presentation.
These charts were presented by an election expert who has spent years crunching election data numbers.
CHART !:
What the guy noticed here is that starting about 20 years ago around the time computers started being used to tabulate votes, that despite the trend in population growth, the number of actual votes being recorded nationwide started outpacing the population increase by about 10%! OK, so one can probably rationalize these discrepancies and dismiss them as other things than fraud, right?
CHART 2:
Taking the state of Wisconsin as an example and tabulating voter registrations for the three biggest counties, he found that there were huge swings in voter registration that coincided with elections, by as much as 25%! Voter registrations would zoom UP right before the election was to happen, then after it was over, they would fall precipitously again! By 25%! Then they would get added right back for the next election! Even more statistically bizarre, despite each county being separate, with differing populations and demographics, THE SAME TRENDS TRACKED EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE STATE; another statistically unresolvable anomaly.
Worth mentioning here is the fact that it used to be that each country's polling stations used to be handed individually, with each country being responsible for their own election handling, then around the same time as these anomalies began to appear, states all began to CENTRALIZE their elections so that one central place in each state handled and managed the election administration STATE WIDE.
CHART 3:
So, the expert tabulated the registration trends for ALL of the counties in Wisconsin and found that they ALL followed the same trends! A statistical IMPOSSIBILITY. Even if there was some sort of mass exodus of old voters and new voters coming in in one place, it would be impossible to explain how the same trends and timing was happening in every county!
CHART 4:
Mind you, data going back before computerization and internet access did NOT reflect these patterns! It is almost as if phantom voters are being added and removed from the roles each election as needed to pad the outcome as needed.
CHART 5:
What was most strange about all of this is that this guy has now crunched the data for all of this across 46 of the 50 states and founds the patterns consistent across EVERY STATE. To anyone used to working with statistics, it is impossible to explain these patterns and fluctuations occurring naturally, leaving the only conscionable explanation that our voter rolls are being manipulated by electronic means.
I'll leave it to others now to tell me how none of this is highly abnormal and suspect, and to give me a simple explanation for how all of these counties and states could all be correlated with such massive swings in registration following similar timelines despite huge differences in location, population, circumstances and demographics.
These charts were presented by an election expert who has spent years crunching election data numbers.
CHART !:
What the guy noticed here is that starting about 20 years ago around the time computers started being used to tabulate votes, that despite the trend in population growth, the number of actual votes being recorded nationwide started outpacing the population increase by about 10%! OK, so one can probably rationalize these discrepancies and dismiss them as other things than fraud, right?
CHART 2:
Taking the state of Wisconsin as an example and tabulating voter registrations for the three biggest counties, he found that there were huge swings in voter registration that coincided with elections, by as much as 25%! Voter registrations would zoom UP right before the election was to happen, then after it was over, they would fall precipitously again! By 25%! Then they would get added right back for the next election! Even more statistically bizarre, despite each county being separate, with differing populations and demographics, THE SAME TRENDS TRACKED EVERYWHERE ACROSS THE STATE; another statistically unresolvable anomaly.
Worth mentioning here is the fact that it used to be that each country's polling stations used to be handed individually, with each country being responsible for their own election handling, then around the same time as these anomalies began to appear, states all began to CENTRALIZE their elections so that one central place in each state handled and managed the election administration STATE WIDE.
CHART 3:
So, the expert tabulated the registration trends for ALL of the counties in Wisconsin and found that they ALL followed the same trends! A statistical IMPOSSIBILITY. Even if there was some sort of mass exodus of old voters and new voters coming in in one place, it would be impossible to explain how the same trends and timing was happening in every county!
CHART 4:
Mind you, data going back before computerization and internet access did NOT reflect these patterns! It is almost as if phantom voters are being added and removed from the roles each election as needed to pad the outcome as needed.
CHART 5:
What was most strange about all of this is that this guy has now crunched the data for all of this across 46 of the 50 states and founds the patterns consistent across EVERY STATE. To anyone used to working with statistics, it is impossible to explain these patterns and fluctuations occurring naturally, leaving the only conscionable explanation that our voter rolls are being manipulated by electronic means.
I'll leave it to others now to tell me how none of this is highly abnormal and suspect, and to give me a simple explanation for how all of these counties and states could all be correlated with such massive swings in registration following similar timelines despite huge differences in location, population, circumstances and demographics.
Last edited:
What the hell?
