A change in our military.

[saved]

Who would have thought just 25 years ago that anyone in our military would ever attack the Christian faith after numerous men and women have died for that faith. Today we are seeing just that.
Military warned ?evangelicals? No. 1 threat

 

[Oldguy]

Who would have thought just 25 years ago that anyone in our military would ever attack the Christian faith after numerous men and women have died for that faith. Today we are seeing just that.
Military warned ?evangelicals? No. 1 threat

You can always count on WND to make a story into something it's not, and you can always count on Nutter's to re-post an item which has already been revealed to be untrue.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/milit...ies-catholics-evangelicals-as-extremists.html

 

[Katzndogz]

Christians have no business being in obama's military. This is an all volunteer service. Christians have no business volunteering.

 

[Mad Scientist]

If a Conservative or Republican had a "single slide" like that, OldGuy would be on it like White on Rice, guaranteed. He's a good Partisan.

OldMan, read this study "Hot Spots of US Terrorism" funded by the DHS. Specifically page 13:
http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf

Terrorism:
The definition of terrorism used by the GTD is: the threatened or actual use of illegal force by non-state actors, in order to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal, through fear, coercion or intimidation.

Category of Ideological Motivation:

Religious: groups that seek to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers, impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists), forcibly insert religion into the political
sphere (e.g., those who seek to politicize religion, such as Christian Reconstructionists and Islamists), and/or bring about Armageddon (apocalyptic millenarian cults; 2010: 17). For example, Jewish Direct Action, Mormon extremist, Jamaat-al-Fuqra, and Covenant, Sword and the Arm of the Lord (CSA) are included in this category.

Now if you have ANY integrity at all OldMan, you'll apologize to and pos rep the OP.

 

[there4eyeM]

So, the US Army was supposedly fighting for Christianity, not to defend the Constitution (including the first amendment)?

 

[Oldguy]

If a Conservative or Republican had a "single slide" like that, OldGuy would be on it like White on Rice, guaranteed. He's a good Partisan.

OldMan, read this study "Hot Spots of US Terrorism" funded by the DHS. Specifically page 13:
http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf

Terrorism:
The definition of terrorism used by the GTD is: the threatened or actual use of illegal force by non-state actors, in order to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal, through fear, coercion or intimidation.

Category of Ideological Motivation:

Religious: groups that seek to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers, impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists), forcibly insert religion into the political
sphere (e.g., those who seek to politicize religion, such as Christian Reconstructionists and Islamists), and/or bring about Armageddon (apocalyptic millenarian cults; 2010: 17). For example, Jewish Direct Action, Mormon extremist, Jamaat-al-Fuqra, and Covenant, Sword and the Arm of the Lord (CSA) are included in this category.

Now if you have ANY integrity at all OldMan, you'll apologize to and pos rep the OP.

I have nothing to apologize for. He's talking about a single, specific incident which the Army has already disavowed and trying to build a military-wide case for it.

Now...if you want to debate whether or not certain religious extremist's should be watched, I'm up for that in another thread.

 

[there4eyeM]

Just like Saudi Arabia's favorite song during Gulf War I; 'Onward, Christian soldiers!"