A Blood War: CPAC - GOP vs Libertarians vs Teaparty

Crackerjaxon, the Dems (have to say it for them) have ended one war and have the other almost over.

You would have far more credit it you would attack neo-conservatism rather than parties on this issue
 
9 CPAC Events We Initially Thought Were Parodies


"Dick Morris, author and political commentator": Morris lost his gig as a Fox News commentator, with cause, after predicting that Mitt Romney would win the presidential election in a landslide. He also projected that Republicans would pick up as many as 13 seats in the Senate, including races in New York and Oregon. (Quick, name last year's Republican Senate candidate in Oregon!) Dave Weigel wasn't the only person to dismiss Morris as a "con artist." Naturally, he was slated to speak on Thursday morning.

"Should we shoot all the consultants now?," featuring Pat Caddell: Finally, a Democrat! Except it's Caddell, a former Jimmy Carter pollster who now plays the part of the Good Democrat on Fox News. In the run-up to the 2012 election, he repeatedly argued that President Obama should remove himself from the presidential race and be replaced by Hillary Clinton. We don't think Pat Caddell should be shot, but it'd be tough to find a consultant who offers worse advice.

"Stop THIS: Threats, Harassment, Intimidation, Slander, and Bullying from the Obama Administration," with Ben Shapiro: In which the Breitbart.com reporter behind the "Friends of Hamas" smear accuses someone else of slander.

:mm:
 
I never head anyone say that obama should be replaced by Hillary in the 2012 election. I heard a lot of people, including democrats say that Hillary should replace Biden.
 
I read many comments on this board before the primaries that HRC should replace BHO.
 
The Dems eliminated anyone who had differing thoughts, so their meetings are: I'm a Socialist! Yeah, me too!
 
I read many comments on this board before the primaries that HRC should replace BHO.

Comments on this board have nothing whatsoever to do with policy of either party. There never was any serious consideration of Hillary replacing BO. There was of her replacing Biden. Wasn't she even offered the VP slot and rejected it?

Is Today the Day? | The Weekly Standard

You can provide solid evidence that your opinions were so if you have them. I don't think they were. BHO appears to be committed, wrongly or rightly, to Joe Mouth.
 
I read many comments on this board before the primaries that HRC should replace BHO.

Comments on this board have nothing whatsoever to do with policy of either party. There never was any serious consideration of Hillary replacing BO. There was of her replacing Biden. Wasn't she even offered the VP slot and rejected it?

Is Today the Day? | The Weekly Standard

You can provide solid evidence that your opinions were so if you have them. I don't think they were. BHO appears to be committed, wrongly or rightly, to Joe Mouth.

I just did, but like a true liberal you will ignore it. It's the one constant among liberals.

BO and and is committed to Biden, even when he has to send Joe Motormouth to a time out once in a while. The rest of the democrats not so much. This will be unbelievably interesting in 2016 when Biden puts in his own bid for the presidency.
 
Comments on this board have nothing whatsoever to do with policy of either party. There never was any serious consideration of Hillary replacing BO. There was of her replacing Biden. Wasn't she even offered the VP slot and rejected it?

Is Today the Day? | The Weekly Standard

You can provide solid evidence that your opinions were so if you have them. I don't think they were. BHO appears to be committed, wrongly or rightly, to Joe Mouth.

I just did, but like a true liberal you will ignore it. It's the one constant among liberals.

BO and and is committed to Biden, even when he has to send Joe Motormouth to a time out once in a while. The rest of the democrats not so much. This will be unbelievably interesting in 2016 when Biden puts in his own bid for the presidency.

You are a mere reactionary and I am not a liberal is what is true here.

The article was musing of no substance. Published 16 August 2012, less than three months before the election, with no merit what soever that Obama was considering anybody but Biden.

This is why I like you posting: you so hurt your side.
 
Republicans are riping themselves apart vying for the "Bash Obama" award, and like the 2012 campaign, achieve nothing but dig their grave deeper and destroy their own party.

So, whose complaining?


:clap2:

Conspiracy theory types might actually believe this is the consequence of some devious Machiavellian plot by Obama to encourage dissent and conflict among conservative ranks.
 
Republicans are riping themselves apart vying for the "Bash Obama" award, and like the 2012 campaign, achieve nothing but dig their grave deeper and destroy their own party.

So, whose complaining?


:clap2:

Conspiracy theory types might actually believe this is the consequence of some devious Machiavellian plot by Obama to encourage dissent and conflict among conservative ranks.

That tricky Obama!
 
there is a faction of the right that merely hate their fellow Americans for not thinking what they want them to think.


The really sad part is those same people derive their opinions without facts and base it on propaganda from right wing media.
 

Forum List

Back
Top