9/11 The Same Time

[Rat in the Hat]

he represents over 1000 families members and the reason its not 2 hours long is they had to pay for it..it is not a story the controlled media is willing to report on ...if it were the fact two former U.S air crash investigator president and leading NASA engineers have come out on record against the official reports would be common knowledge...instead it is presented as the opinions of... Rosie O'Donnell

Sure he does.

And I represent over 1000 people that walked on the moon.

See how easy it is to make unfounded claims.

yes thats why these these signatory's are confirmed and speaking of men who walked on the moon....


Capt. Edgar Mitchell, U.S. Navy (ret), BS Industrial Management, BS Aeronautical Engineering, Doctor of Science, Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT – Pilot and Astronaut. Sixth man to walk on the moon (Apollo 14 mission). Patrol bomber and attack plane pilot, U.S. Navy. Test Pilot, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 5 (VX-5). Chief of Project Management Division, Navy Field Office for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory Project. Graduated first in his class from the Aerospace Research Pilot School, and served as an instructor there. Recipient of many awards and honors including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the USN Distinguished Medal and three NASA Group Achievement Awards. Inducted to the Space Hall of Fame in 1979 and the Astronaut Hall of Fame in 1998. Recipient of honorary doctorates in engineering from New Mexico State University, the University of Akron, Carnegie Mellon University, and a ScD from Embry-Riddle University. Founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences.


Endorser of and proposed Commissioner of a New Investigation into 9/11 as described in the New York City Ballot Initiative 11/08: "Petition to Create a NYC Independent Commission with Subpoena Power to Conduct a Comprehensive and Fact-Driven Investigation of All Relevant Aspects of the Tragic Events of September 11, 2001 and Issue a Report.

WHEREAS, many New York City voters believe that there remain many unanswered questions critical to establishing the truth about all relevant events leading up to, during and subsequent to the tragic attacks occurring on September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), and

WHEREAS, no prior investigation by any New York City agency or any other governmental entity has resulted in the citizens being provided with those critical answers or information necessary to establish the truth about those tragic events, ...

An independent, temporary New York City commission (the “Commission”) is hereby created to conduct a comprehensive, factdriven investigation into the events that took place on 9/11, as well as to thoroughly examine related events before and after the attacks, including any activities attempting to hide, cover up, impede or obstruct any investigation into these 9/11 events, following wherever the facts may lead. The Commission shall publish one or more reports of their findings."


Website: Ed Mitchell

If and when this commission if formed, does an investigation, and comes to the same conclusion as the first one, will you accept their results? Or will you demand yet another investigation?

 

[eots]

Sure he does.

And I represent over 1000 people that walked on the moon.

See how easy it is to make unfounded claims.

yes thats why these these signatory's are confirmed and speaking of men who walked on the moon....


Capt. Edgar Mitchell, U.S. Navy (ret), BS Industrial Management, BS Aeronautical Engineering, Doctor of Science, Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT – Pilot and Astronaut. Sixth man to walk on the moon (Apollo 14 mission). Patrol bomber and attack plane pilot, U.S. Navy. Test Pilot, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 5 (VX-5). Chief of Project Management Division, Navy Field Office for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory Project. Graduated first in his class from the Aerospace Research Pilot School, and served as an instructor there. Recipient of many awards and honors including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the USN Distinguished Medal and three NASA Group Achievement Awards. Inducted to the Space Hall of Fame in 1979 and the Astronaut Hall of Fame in 1998. Recipient of honorary doctorates in engineering from New Mexico State University, the University of Akron, Carnegie Mellon University, and a ScD from Embry-Riddle University. Founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences.


Endorser of and proposed Commissioner of a New Investigation into 9/11 as described in the New York City Ballot Initiative 11/08: "Petition to Create a NYC Independent Commission with Subpoena Power to Conduct a Comprehensive and Fact-Driven Investigation of All Relevant Aspects of the Tragic Events of September 11, 2001 and Issue a Report.

WHEREAS, many New York City voters believe that there remain many unanswered questions critical to establishing the truth about all relevant events leading up to, during and subsequent to the tragic attacks occurring on September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), and

WHEREAS, no prior investigation by any New York City agency or any other governmental entity has resulted in the citizens being provided with those critical answers or information necessary to establish the truth about those tragic events, ...

An independent, temporary New York City commission (the “Commission”) is hereby created to conduct a comprehensive, factdriven investigation into the events that took place on 9/11, as well as to thoroughly examine related events before and after the attacks, including any activities attempting to hide, cover up, impede or obstruct any investigation into these 9/11 events, following wherever the facts may lead. The Commission shall publish one or more reports of their findings."


Website: Ed Mitchell

If and when this commission if formed, does an investigation, and comes to the same conclusion as the first one, will you accept their results? Or will you demand yet another investigation?

if it done under the terms of the petition the truth would be found

 

[Rat in the Hat]

yes thats why these these signatory's are confirmed and speaking of men who walked on the moon....


Capt. Edgar Mitchell, U.S. Navy (ret), BS Industrial Management, BS Aeronautical Engineering, Doctor of Science, Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT – Pilot and Astronaut. Sixth man to walk on the moon (Apollo 14 mission). Patrol bomber and attack plane pilot, U.S. Navy. Test Pilot, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 5 (VX-5). Chief of Project Management Division, Navy Field Office for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory Project. Graduated first in his class from the Aerospace Research Pilot School, and served as an instructor there. Recipient of many awards and honors including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the USN Distinguished Medal and three NASA Group Achievement Awards. Inducted to the Space Hall of Fame in 1979 and the Astronaut Hall of Fame in 1998. Recipient of honorary doctorates in engineering from New Mexico State University, the University of Akron, Carnegie Mellon University, and a ScD from Embry-Riddle University. Founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences.


Endorser of and proposed Commissioner of a New Investigation into 9/11 as described in the New York City Ballot Initiative 11/08: "Petition to Create a NYC Independent Commission with Subpoena Power to Conduct a Comprehensive and Fact-Driven Investigation of All Relevant Aspects of the Tragic Events of September 11, 2001 and Issue a Report.

WHEREAS, many New York City voters believe that there remain many unanswered questions critical to establishing the truth about all relevant events leading up to, during and subsequent to the tragic attacks occurring on September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), and

WHEREAS, no prior investigation by any New York City agency or any other governmental entity has resulted in the citizens being provided with those critical answers or information necessary to establish the truth about those tragic events, ...

An independent, temporary New York City commission (the “Commission”) is hereby created to conduct a comprehensive, factdriven investigation into the events that took place on 9/11, as well as to thoroughly examine related events before and after the attacks, including any activities attempting to hide, cover up, impede or obstruct any investigation into these 9/11 events, following wherever the facts may lead. The Commission shall publish one or more reports of their findings."


Website: Ed Mitchell

If and when this commission if formed, does an investigation, and comes to the same conclusion as the first one, will you accept their results? Or will you demand yet another investigation?

if it done under the terms of the petition the truth would be found

Nice half answer.

If the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept them?

 

[eots]

only if the investigation followed the terms of the petition

 

[Rat in the Hat]

only if the investigation followed the terms of the petition

In other words, only if it is done by your ground rules, and comes to the conclusion you want.

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[PhysicsExist]

only if the investigation followed the terms of the petition

In other words, only if it is done by your ground rules, and comes to the conclusion you want.

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vI1DVjQ0M[/ame]

I dare you to take off the blinders and absorb this.
Are you man enough to watch the videos of the people you are disrespecting? I doubt it.
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed.
Thank you.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

only if the investigation followed the terms of the petition

In other words, only if it is done by your ground rules, and comes to the conclusion you want.

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vI1DVjQ0M[/ame]

I dare you to take off the blinders and absorb this.
Are you man enough to watch the videos of the people you are disrespecting? I doubt it.
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed.
Thank you.

I've watched that video several times now, Chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

If another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

 

[PhysicsExist]

In other words, only if it is done by your ground rules, and comes to the conclusion you want.

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vI1DVjQ0M[/ame]

I dare you to take off the blinders and absorb this.
Are you man enough to watch the videos of the people you are disrespecting? I doubt it.
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed.
Thank you.

I've watched that video several times now, Chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

If another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: Of course I would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as NISTs, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering Fires cannot do ANYTHING they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used. So its a matter of an impossibility that the independent investigation would conclude the same results, considering NISTs results Defy Newtonian Physics.

 

[candycorn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vI1DVjQ0M

I dare you to take off the blinders and absorb this.
Are you man enough to watch the videos of the people you are disrespecting? I doubt it.
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed.
Thank you.

I've watched that video several times now, Chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

If another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: Of course I would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as NISTs, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering Fires cannot do ANYTHING they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used. So its a matter of an impossibility that the independent investigation would conclude the same results, considering NISTs results Defy Newtonian Physics.

Gee, you're funny. Not as funny as you were on AWE but sticking with it to the end I see. It won't end well for you. It never does.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vI1DVjQ0M

I dare you to take off the blinders and absorb this.
Are you man enough to watch the videos of the people you are disrespecting? I doubt it.
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed.
Thank you.

I've watched that video several times now, Chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

If another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: Of course I would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as NISTs, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering Fires cannot do ANYTHING they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used.

I never said he was a liar, Chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, Don Quixote. Say hello to Sancho for me, OK?

 

[PhysicsExist]

I've watched that video several times now, Chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

If another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: Of course I would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as NISTs, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering Fires cannot do ANYTHING they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used.

I never said he was a liar, Chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, Don Quixote. Say hello to Sancho for me, OK?

Once Again:

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.

You Said:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

 

[eots]

i've watched that video several times now, chris, and neither it nor your text changes my question. I'll repeat it, and enlarge it so that you can read and understand it.

if another investigation is done, and the results are the same as the first investigation, will you accept the results?

stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
i've watched that video several times now,

then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: of course i would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as nists, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering fires cannot do anything they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used.

i never said he was a liar, chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, don quixote. Say hello to sancho for me, ok?

what a freak he has to imagine you are someone else so he can debate with them instead...what a nut

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: Of course I would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as NISTs, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering Fires cannot do ANYTHING they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used.

I never said he was a liar, Chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, Don Quixote. Say hello to Sancho for me, OK?

Once Again:

Stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.

You Said:
I've watched that video several times now,

Then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

Please read it again. I've bolded and enlarged the appropriate section.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

stop calling me chris, you have no merit for that claim, and its arrogant as hell to assume that, just so you can avoid the truth.
You:
i've watched that video several times now,

then could you please:
But if you do watch the video front to back, let us know why he's a liar, and why a reinvestigation is not needed?

To address you question: of course i would accept a independent investigation's results if they were to come back the same as nists, but it is physically impossible for that to happen considering fires cannot do anything they claim it to do, let alone the aspect for freefall for 2.25 seconds is not possible unless explosives are used.

i never said he was a liar, chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, don quixote. Say hello to sancho for me, ok?

what a freak he has to imagine you are someone else so he can debate with them instead...what a nut

I know who I am debating with, so stay out of it.

This is between me and Chris, and doesn't involve you.

 

[PhysicsExist]

i never said he was a liar, chris. I just said it didn't provide you with a reason to avoid my question.

Your reply indicates that you in fact would not accept any results that didn't match yours, as it would be "physically impossible". It's nice to know you are willing to waste other people's money on investigation after investigation until you get the results you want.

Good luck with that, don quixote. Say hello to sancho for me, ok?

what a freak he has to imagine you are someone else so he can debate with them instead...what a nut

I know who I am debating with, so stay out of it.

This is between me and Chris, and doesn't involve you.

I am not chris, i'm just gonna ignore that statement because thats what you do to children, you tone them out.

Stop with the distractions and have some self respect.


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFP_zKYU3aE[/ame]

 

[candycorn]

what a freak he has to imagine you are someone else so he can debate with them instead...what a nut

I know who I am debating with, so stay out of it.

This is between me and Chris, and doesn't involve you.

I am not chris, i'm just gonna ignore that statement because thats what you do to children, you tone them out.

Stop with the distractions and have some self respect.


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFP_zKYU3aE[/ame]

Dive was right, you're a fucking moron. How much longer you going to keep up the charade CD?

 

[PhysicsExist]

I know who I am debating with, so stay out of it.

This is between me and Chris, and doesn't involve you.

I am not chris, i'm just gonna ignore that statement because thats what you do to children, you tone them out.

Stop with the distractions and have some self respect.


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFP_zKYU3aE[/ame]

Dive was right, you're a fucking moron. How much longer you going to keep up the charade CD?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw[/ame]

How long are you going to ignore pressing play and even watching these videos? You are so blind, BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE to be. Have some self respect, and at least look at the other side that is supposedly a 'fraud'. Use some logic, instead of acting and commentating.

 

[R.C. Christian]

This thread has been effectively derailed, but the fact still remains that the Mossad operated recklessly in the U.S. during 2000-01 and detected the Atta's men. I'm not going to prove the OP's supposition because it is his argument to support, however, it is a damn solid piece of information that I considered to be common knowledge so it's rather embarassing that I even have to post the following.

Below is a snippet of information that will get you started and give you background and what our good, genocidal allies are up to in our country. It's an Austrailian piece, but it's origin should reflect it's neutrality. I'll let you take the ball further and make up your own mind, but this will get you pointed in the right direction. In the process you should probably consider for yourselves if Israel is an ally or an enemy, but that isn't really the point. The point is that if you follow this closely it will lead to the 911 intel and you won't have to take the OP's word for it.

Cells of young Israeli intelligence operatives continue to openly solicit relationships with U.S. military personnel from shopping mall kiosks, according to an informed source.

WMR has learned that one such kiosk operates at the MacArthur Center Mall in Norfolk, Virginia, where a number of U.S. Navy personnel from the nearby naval bases are regularly confronted by aggressive young Israelis selling Dead Sea cosmetic products who inquire about where the personnel are stationed and the nature of their jobs. Young Israeli women working at the kiosk also appear to want to strike up a closer relationship with some of the naval personnel.

The use of young Israelis, many of whom continue to serve in a reserve status with the Israel Defense Force, as intelligence agents, has changed somewhat over the past decade. Young Israeli “art students” first conducted unsolicited visits to the homes and offices of federal and military employees trying to sell cheap Chinese-made bogus Israeli artwork while casing neighborhoods and office buildings.

Israeli-operated mall kiosks have transitioned from selling toys to cosmetics.

On August 7, 2005, WMR reported: In November 2001, the INS arrested several Israelis, including some with military backgrounds, selling Puzzle Car and Zoom Copter toys from shopping mall kiosks and vending carts. Many of the malls were located near U.S. government facilities, including the Pentagon and CIA. A majority of the Israelis, arrested for visa violations instead of espionage, worked for a Florida-based company called Quality Sales. A spokesman for the company admitted the company hired vacationing Israeli students but they had the wrong visas. The spokesman also revealed the Israelis were deemed “special interest” cases by INS-- a new government designation applied to terrorism suspects in the wake of 911. Federal authorities suspect the Israelis were using the kiosks as intelligence fronts in the same manner that Israelis were using door-to-door art sales as covers. The National Counterintelligence Center (NCIX) stated in a report issued in March 2001 that, “In the past six weeks, employees in federal office buildings located throughout the United States have reported suspicious activities connected with individuals representing themselves as foreign students selling or delivering artwork. Employees have observed both males and females attempting to bypass facility security and enter federal buildings.” The report was temporarily removed from the NCIX web site.

One of the malls where the Israeli”toy sellers” based their operations was the Pentagon City Mall, just across Interstate 395 from the Pentagon. In July 2004, the mall served as the rendezvous point for alleged Israeli Pentagon spy Larry Franklin and Keith Weissman, an AIPAC official. Franklin warned Weissman that Iranian agents were going to start attacking American soldiers and Israeli agents in Iraq. Weissman then went to brief the account of the meeting to Steve Rosen, another senior AIPAC official. They both informed the Israeli embassy in Washington and Glenn Kessler, a reporter for The Washington Post. Those phone calls were being wiretapped by the FBI as part of its investigation of a major Israeli spy ring in the United States, an investigation that had been going on since before the 9/11 attacks. The FBI was also monitoring meetings between Franklin, Weissman, and Rosen, including one held in February 2003 at the Arlington, Virginia, Ritz-Carlton hotel, which adjoins the Pentagon City Mall.

In February 2005, an Israeli man named Ohad Cohen was deported, along with four other Israelis, from Omaha, Nebraska. In what was becoming a common occurrence in the United States, a total of 10 Israelis, who were working at shopping mall kiosks in the Omaha and Lincoln areas, were deported by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials for illegally working in the United States on tourist visas. The Israelis operated out of Omaha’s Oak View Mall and Lincoln’s Gateway Westfield Mall. The Federal government probe was reported to be part of a wider probe of Israeli shopping mall kiosk activity throughout the Midwest. In December 2004, FBI and immigration officers arrested 15 Israelis in Minnesota and three operating from a mall kiosk in Grand Forks, North Dakota. Omaha is also the headquarters of the U.S. Air Force Strategic Air Command (SAC).

On January 13, 2009, WMR reported: WMR has also learned of other Israeli mall kiosks around the country that hired aggressive Israeli young men and women who badger customers and ask personal questions. Israeli mall kiosks engaged in the aggressive sales practices have been set up at the North Shore Mall in Peabody, Massachusetts, and Northeast Mall in Hurst, Texas, a Dallas suburb. The mall kiosks in Peabody sell Israeli hand cream and nail files. The kiosk in Hurst has a male overseer, about 45 years old, who lives in the Bahamas.

Many of the Israeli mall vendors claim ignorance when told by customers that Israeli mall kiosks were identified as Mossad front operations in a Fox News report. More incredibly, some Israelis feign ignorance when the term “9/11” is used. They claim not to know what the term means.

In the same report, WMR reported: Last month, police in New South Wales, Australia, arrested the leader of an Israeli “art student” ring who was selling mass-produced paintings from China as valuable artwork from Israel. The Israeli man arrested, age 23, fit the profile of a number of Israeli “art students” rounded up, detained, and deported by U.S. authorities in the months prior to 9/11. The “art students” were casing federal offices, military installations, and the homes of federal agents and officials.

The Israeli was arrested by police in Wamberal on Australia’s eastern central coast. Fifty Chinese-made oil paintings were found in the Israeli’s Mitsubishi station wagon. He was attempting to sell the paintings for between 500 and 1,000 Australian dollars. The Israelis in Australia visited a number of homes and claimed they were university students from Israel. The Israeli arrested lived in Sydney’s Bondi Beach neighborhood.

Recently, there was yet another story about the use of Israeli mall kiosk operators as intelligence agents. In the most recent case in Perth, Australia, an Australian man was arrested and charged with violation of an Australian hate crime law for exposing the activities of Israeli-run mall kiosks owned by an Israeli firm in Melbourne whose products are called “Seacret -- Minerals From The Dead Sea.” The president of the Australian Union of Jewish Students lodged a criminal complaint against the investigator who maintained that Israeli nationals were attempting to obtain classified information on the Royal Australian Navy’s Collins class submarine as well as other defense programs.

 

[candycorn]

I am not chris, i'm just gonna ignore that statement because thats what you do to children, you tone them out.

Stop with the distractions and have some self respect.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFP_zKYU3aE

Dive was right, you're a fucking moron. How much longer you going to keep up the charade CD?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw[/ame]

How long are you going to ignore pressing play and even watching these videos? You are so blind, BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE to be. Have some self respect, and at least look at the other side that is supposedly a 'fraud'. Use some logic, instead of acting and commentating.

Seen them all.
Debunked them all.
Back when you posted as CD et. al.
Before you got banned from that site.

 

[PhysicsExist]

Dive was right, you're a fucking moron. How much longer you going to keep up the charade CD?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw[/ame]

How long are you going to ignore pressing play and even watching these videos? You are so blind, BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE to be. Have some self respect, and at least look at the other side that is supposedly a 'fraud'. Use some logic, instead of acting and commentating.

Seen them all.
Debunked them all.
Back when you posted as CD et. al.
Before you got banned from that site.

Show me 1 piece of evidence that proves freefall did not occur
Since you can't, then let's talk about freefall.

If a building made of steel freefell for 8 floors, or 2.25 seconds, then each support column on each floor had to of been simultaneously removed at the time of collapse. Fire cannot melt steel, or symmetrically burn 8 floors and have each of them fail at the precise moment. Video evidence proves fires were not as what they said, witness testimony proves there were explosions, and expert analysis has changed NISTs official findings and actually made the admit to freefall.

AE911Truth.org

Why are you stonewalling the truth? I dont understand why you disregard the facts I state, and then talk about some childish talking point that has no relevance to these factors.