Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is an orange...
Great post. Cite your sources though.
Why is it you're talking to yourself? We've seen this act before CD when you admitted to having 5 socks on arguewitheveryone.com.
Isn't it time truthers tried to be truthful?
This is an orange...
This is an orange...
Great post. Cite your sources though.
Why is it you're talking to yourself? We've seen this act before CD when you admitted to having 5 socks on arguewitheveryone.com.
Isn't it time truthers tried to be truthful?
This is an orange...
Why don't you post your real Avatar...
This is an orange...
Why is it you're talking to yourself? We've seen this act before CD when you admitted to having 5 socks on arguewitheveryone.com.
Isn't it time truthers tried to be truthful?
This is an orange...
Why don't you post your real Avatar...
Why don't you try not to lie...for at least one day. Posing as someone different is lying...then posting a "thank you" reply to yourself is....well... just sad boy!
Why don't you post your real Avatar...
Why don't you try not to lie...for at least one day. Posing as someone different is lying...then posting a "thank you" reply to yourself is....well... just sad boy!
Let me get this straight...you are accusing me of being PhysicsExist too?
Why don't you try not to lie...for at least one day. Posing as someone different is lying...then posting a "thank you" reply to yourself is....well... just sad boy!
Let me get this straight...you are accusing me of being PhysicsExist too?
Yes. And I proved it:
This is an orange...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/146421-this-is-an-orange.html#post3089774
Additional circumstantial evidence includes you having done this in the past and denied doing it in the past as well; just as you have done here.
Care to make it worse for yourself and continue with the charade...or you could just admit that you're a lying sack of shit that nobody should respect much less listen to.
Let me get this straight...you are accusing me of being PhysicsExist too?
Yes. And I proved it:
This is an orange...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/146421-this-is-an-orange.html#post3089774
Additional circumstantial evidence includes you having done this in the past and denied doing it in the past as well; just as you have done here.
Care to make it worse for yourself and continue with the charade...or you could just admit that you're a lying sack of shit that nobody should respect much less listen to.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
Let me get this straight...you are accusing me of being PhysicsExist too?
Yes. And I proved it:
This is an orange...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/146421-this-is-an-orange.html#post3089774
Additional circumstantial evidence includes you having done this in the past and denied doing it in the past as well; just as you have done here.
Care to make it worse for yourself and continue with the charade...or you could just admit that you're a lying sack of shit that nobody should respect much less listen to.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
Yes. And I proved it:
This is an orange...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/146421-this-is-an-orange.html#post3089774
Additional circumstantial evidence includes you having done this in the past and denied doing it in the past as well; just as you have done here.
Care to make it worse for yourself and continue with the charade...or you could just admit that you're a lying sack of shit that nobody should respect much less listen to.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
I have no idea who he is, just a coincidence. The video must be powerful and to the point.
This type of accusation is the exact way these anti-Truth people find their conclusions. They make up their own commentary to match their opinions that exclude actual science and come up with a snuggle-fun conclusion that his a complete farce. Such as me being on 2 accounts at once.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
I have no idea who he is, just a coincidence. The video must be powerful and to the point.
This type of accusation is the exact way these anti-Truth people find their conclusions. They make up their own commentary to match their opinions that exclude actual science and come up with a snuggle-fun conclusion that his a complete farce. Such as me being on 2 accounts at once.
This seems worth repeating in this thread too...If she would check to see who's online at the bottom she would see we are both logged in right now....she's not the brightest bulb on the tree...
Yes. And I proved it:
This is an orange...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/146421-this-is-an-orange.html#post3089774
Additional circumstantial evidence includes you having done this in the past and denied doing it in the past as well; just as you have done here.
Care to make it worse for yourself and continue with the charade...or you could just admit that you're a lying sack of shit that nobody should respect much less listen to.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
I have no idea who he is, just a coincidence. The video must be powerful and to the point.
This type of accusation is the exact way these anti-Truth people find their conclusions. They make up their own commentary to match their opinions that exclude actual science and come up with a snuggle-fun conclusion that his a complete farce. Such as me being on 2 accounts at once.
All I can do is shake my head at you...he happens to start a thread on the same subject I did awhile back and this is your conclusion???
I'll let PhysicsExist take care of you on this one...
I have no idea who he is, just a coincidence. The video must be powerful and to the point.
This type of accusation is the exact way these anti-Truth people find their conclusions. They make up their own commentary to match their opinions that exclude actual science and come up with a snuggle-fun conclusion that his a complete farce. Such as me being on 2 accounts at once.
You're right. Nobody in this country owns or has access to more than one computer at a time.
Your statement about not being on 2 accounts at once carries as much weight as your orange video.
I have no idea who he is, just a coincidence. The video must be powerful and to the point.
This type of accusation is the exact way these anti-Truth people find their conclusions. They make up their own commentary to match their opinions that exclude actual science and come up with a snuggle-fun conclusion that his a complete farce. Such as me being on 2 accounts at once.
You're right. Nobody in this country owns or has access to more than one computer at a time.
Your statement about not being on 2 accounts at once carries as much weight as your orange video.
How does a video showing evidence, supported by physics, anywhere near the caliber of our statement about not being on 2 accounts? We aren't the same person. get over it please.
These videos provide your brain with no argument, just watch the vid and it shows you clearly, its a controlled demolition. There's no way around it. An object cannot freefall for 2.25 seconds through steel, unless that steel isn't there. Fire cannot remove steel. Therefore explosives were used. None were tested for, and NIST's report has been challenged and debunked by a group of brave 1,400 engineers and architects so far, which has lead to the new BuildingWhat? - A TV Ad Campaign to Raise Awareness of Building 7 - What is Building 7 ? campaign, and NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
You're right. Nobody in this country owns or has access to more than one computer at a time.
Your statement about not being on 2 accounts at once carries as much weight as your orange video.
How does a video showing evidence, supported by physics, anywhere near the caliber of our statement about not being on 2 accounts? We aren't the same person. get over it please.
These videos provide your brain with no argument, just watch the vid and it shows you clearly, its a controlled demolition. There's no way around it. An object cannot freefall for 2.25 seconds through steel, unless that steel isn't there. Fire cannot remove steel. Therefore explosives were used. None were tested for, and NIST's report has been challenged and debunked by a group of brave 1,400 engineers and architects so far, which has lead to the new BuildingWhat? - A TV Ad Campaign to Raise Awareness of Building 7 - What is Building 7 ? campaign, and NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Who ran into WTC7 while it was burning to set the charges for your CD to happen?
If you try to say they were planted in advance, how were they so sure Newtonian Physics would carry debris from the towers into WTC7? If the Newtonian Physics would have dropped the debris away from #7, what excuse would they have used to detonate the charges? And then they would have had to do a reverse conspiracy to remove the charges without anyone seeing them.
I guess by your theory, it was damn lucky Newtonian Physics was on their side that Tuesday morning.
How does a video showing evidence, supported by physics, anywhere near the caliber of our statement about not being on 2 accounts? We aren't the same person. get over it please.
These videos provide your brain with no argument, just watch the vid and it shows you clearly, its a controlled demolition. There's no way around it. An object cannot freefall for 2.25 seconds through steel, unless that steel isn't there. Fire cannot remove steel. Therefore explosives were used. None were tested for, and NIST's report has been challenged and debunked by a group of brave 1,400 engineers and architects so far, which has lead to the new BuildingWhat? - A TV Ad Campaign to Raise Awareness of Building 7 - What is Building 7 ? campaign, and NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
Who ran into WTC7 while it was burning to set the charges for your CD to happen?
If you try to say they were planted in advance, how were they so sure Newtonian Physics would carry debris from the towers into WTC7? If the Newtonian Physics would have dropped the debris away from #7, what excuse would they have used to detonate the charges? And then they would have had to do a reverse conspiracy to remove the charges without anyone seeing them.
I guess by your theory, it was damn lucky Newtonian Physics was on their side that Tuesday morning.
What?
A building freefell for 2.25 seconds, this is impossible.
I dont know who did it, I dont know why they did it, and I dont know how. All I have is forensic evidence, video evidence, witness testimony, and expert corroboration, that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition. Physics DO NOT LIE.
www.youtube.com/ae911truth
Who ran into WTC7 while it was burning to set the charges for your CD to happen?
If you try to say they were planted in advance, how were they so sure Newtonian Physics would carry debris from the towers into WTC7? If the Newtonian Physics would have dropped the debris away from #7, what excuse would they have used to detonate the charges? And then they would have had to do a reverse conspiracy to remove the charges without anyone seeing them.
I guess by your theory, it was damn lucky Newtonian Physics was on their side that Tuesday morning.
What?
A building freefell for 2.25 seconds, this is impossible.
I dont know who did it, I dont know why they did it, and I dont know how. All I have is forensic evidence, video evidence, witness testimony, and expert corroboration, that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition. Physics DO NOT LIE.
www.youtube.com/ae911truth
Sorry, but you're just making a fool of yourself here, Corky.
If you have all this "evidence" "that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition", then you have to know who did it, and how. If you don't, it can't be 100%, but some percentage less than that.
100% means knowing ALL the facts, not part of them.
What?
A building freefell for 2.25 seconds, this is impossible.
I dont know who did it, I dont know why they did it, and I dont know how. All I have is forensic evidence, video evidence, witness testimony, and expert corroboration, that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition. Physics DO NOT LIE.
www.youtube.com/ae911truth
Sorry, but you're just making a fool of yourself here, Corky.
If you have all this "evidence" "that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition", then you have to know who did it, and how. If you don't, it can't be 100%, but some percentage less than that.
100% means knowing ALL the facts, not part of them.
That is a complete farce. You are really losing credibility as a 'normal' person.
If I have 100% proven fact that someone was shot with a gun-a bullet in their head-I dont have the killer, or how they did it. I just know someone was shot with a gun. That's when you hire an 'investigator' to figure out who and why.
If a building was brought down with freefall acceleration, it was a demolition, according to physics. I do not know who did it, or why. Thats what an 'investigation' is for.
Stop attacking me, and you should certainly stop posting false claims that have no merit whatsoever. Its embarrassing
What?
A building freefell for 2.25 seconds, this is impossible.
I dont know who did it, I dont know why they did it, and I dont know how. All I have is forensic evidence, video evidence, witness testimony, and expert corroboration, that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition. Physics DO NOT LIE.
www.youtube.com/ae911truth
Sorry, but you're just making a fool of yourself here, Corky.
If you have all this "evidence" "that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition", then you have to know who did it, and how. If you don't, it can't be 100%, but some percentage less than that.
100% means knowing ALL the facts, not part of them.
That is a complete farce. You are really losing credibility as a 'normal' person.
If I have 100% proven fact that someone was shot with a gun-a bullet in their head-I dont have the killer, or how they did it. I just know someone was shot with a gun. That's when you hire an 'investigator' to figure out who and why.
If a building was brought down with freefall acceleration, it was a demolition, according to physics. I do not know who did it, or why. Thats what an 'investigation' is for.
Stop attacking me, and you should certainly stop posting false claims that have no merit whatsoever. Its embarrassing
Sorry, but you're just making a fool of yourself here, Corky.
If you have all this "evidence" "that 100% proves wtc7 was a controlled demolition", then you have to know who did it, and how. If you don't, it can't be 100%, but some percentage less than that.
100% means knowing ALL the facts, not part of them.
That is a complete farce. You are really losing credibility as a 'normal' person.
If I have 100% proven fact that someone was shot with a gun-a bullet in their head-I dont have the killer, or how they did it. I just know someone was shot with a gun. That's when you hire an 'investigator' to figure out who and why.
If a building was brought down with freefall acceleration, it was a demolition, according to physics. I do not know who did it, or why. Thats what an 'investigation' is for.
Stop attacking me, and you should certainly stop posting false claims that have no merit whatsoever. Its embarrassing
Almost as embarrassing as having your socking ass exposed.
That is a complete farce. You are really losing credibility as a 'normal' person.
If I have 100% proven fact that someone was shot with a gun-a bullet in their head-I dont have the killer, or how they did it. I just know someone was shot with a gun. That's when you hire an 'investigator' to figure out who and why.
If a building was brought down with freefall acceleration, it was a demolition, according to physics. I do not know who did it, or why. Thats what an 'investigation' is for.
Stop attacking me, and you should certainly stop posting false claims that have no merit whatsoever. Its embarrassing
Almost as embarrassing as having your socking ass exposed.
CC, you're on the right track, but I think you have the perp wrong. I have come to the opinion that PE is Christophera's sock.
1) In the Chinese missile thread, he said he is in Santa Barbara CA, home of Christophera Brown.
2) Chri$$y's threads are losing steam, and are just being used for ridicule. If he tries to revive that whacky theory in a new thread, it will suffer the same fate.
That is a complete farce. You are really losing credibility as a 'normal' person.
If I have 100% proven fact that someone was shot with a gun-a bullet in their head-I dont have the killer, or how they did it. I just know someone was shot with a gun. That's when you hire an 'investigator' to figure out who and why.
If a building was brought down with freefall acceleration, it was a demolition, according to physics. I do not know who did it, or why. Thats what an 'investigation' is for.
Stop attacking me, and you should certainly stop posting false claims that have no merit whatsoever. Its embarrassing
Almost as embarrassing as having your socking ass exposed.
CC, you're on the right track, but I think you have the perp wrong. I have come to the opinion that PE is Christophera's sock.
1) In the Chinese missile thread, he said he is in Santa Barbara CA, home of Christophera Brown.
2) Chri$$y's threads are losing steam, and are just being used for ridicule. If he tries to revive that whacky theory in a new thread, it will suffer the same fate.
