9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds

[LA RAM FAN]

the shills wont watch these video because firefighters EXPERTS that were experienced in the sounds of explosives,are opions they have no interest in.LOL

They won't admit to watching them, then they'll search for one of their go-to 9/11 conspiracy theory debunking sites and figure out what to say .

I know it they won’t do that.

 

[the other mike]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[irosie91]

how nice----tin man and spam-fan are playing
candy-land together

 

[basquebromance]

 

[candycorn]

I wonder if the 9/11 truthers are upset or thrilled that their batshit crazy conspiracy theory is being Trumped by all of the other batshit crazy conspiracy theories.

 

[the other mike]

editing

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The good old deleting of 9/11 truth videos at its best.

 

[the other mike]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

Bumped for the resident trolls to drool over.

 

[the other mike]

My favorite shot of the Empire State Building.

 

[the other mike]

They never listened to my idea of flexible towers.

 

[the other mike]

"Lucky Larry" Silverstein Family Were all "running late" on 9/11

groups.google.com

 

[the other mike]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

Google is trying to stay ahead of it by removing all the pertinent videos. They do it gradually one by one so it's not too obvious, but I would hope if you're a true American you would be asking why as I am.

 

[the other mike]

Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

www.911review.com

 

[BULLDOG]

Google is trying to stay ahead of it by removing all the pertinent videos. They do it gradually one by one so it's not too obvious, but I would hope if you're a true American you would be asking why as I am.

I am always impressed with the crazy right wing's "NO CONSPIRACY THEORY LEFT BEHIND" program.

 

[Colin norris]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

Jesus Christ. By your measure the more people talk about the more true it becomes.

From whoever you plagairised that from is barking mad like all the conspiracy theorists like you.

If I want truth in the matter I'll ask those Martians at Boswell.

 

[the other mike]

I am always impressed with the crazy right wing's "NO CONSPIRACY THEORY LEFT BEHIND" program.

You like being wrong a lot don't you because I'm one of the least far-right individuals at USMB.

Ignorance is bliss right. So keep on being wrong bulldog.

 

[the other mike]

As a matter of fact in 2016 I voted for Jill Stein which probably makes me farther left than you BULLDOG .

Now do some homework and see that everything I've posted is true. Or you can believe the paid shills like Soup Nazi and whoever else.

 

[BULLDOG]

As a matter of fact in 2016 I voted for Jill Stein which probably makes me farther left than you BULLDOG .

Now do some homework and see that everything I've posted is true. Or you can believe the paid shills like Soup Nazi and whoever else.

9/11 truthers are anti government right wing nut jobs. You knew a vote for Jill Stein was the same as a vote for the crazy guy. You advocate crazy right wing crap, you are a crazy right winger. That's how it works.

 

[the other mike]

9/11 truthers are anti government right wing nut jobs. You knew a vote for Jill Stein was the same as a vote for the crazy guy. You advocate crazy right wing crap, you are a crazy right winger. That's how it works.

You're going to believe whatever you want..... that's what ignorant people do, but I can assure you I have no reason to lie.