5stringJeff
Senior Member
The ClayTaurus said:That's nice in theory, but you wouldn't have a city, you'd have a war zone. I guess it might benefit anyone who survived for the first couple of years. Maybe if you started a new city with no people in it... but for a place as dysfunctional as it already is, I don't think you can count on the population to responsibly handle being flooded with guns.
I absolutely disagree. Yes, you may have increased incidents of criminals being shot while committing crimes. But a city of responsible firearms owners will eventualy be a city with low, low crime, because what criminal is going to try and mug, burglarize, rape, etc. when their potential victim may be armed?