Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I thought conservatives were for less gov't interference. So why then regulate what two consenting adults do? From where are they getting their ideas from? As a lifelong Christian I don't understand their viewpoint. Please explain.
I've been married to my wife for 48 great years. She has been my inspiration. She advised me to take a chance and never look back when starting my own construction business. n She worked with 3rd grade students for 33 years. We had 3 wonderful kids and raised them and they are doing well. That being said, I don't see the huge issue with gay marriage. Why do some feel so threatened by it? I see it as a concocted issue.
I have been married to my wonderful, beautiful wife for over 20 years. I have no idea why Conservatives think my marriage would be at risk if Bob and Bill can get legally married.
I've been married to my partner of 20 years for six years now. No floods, famine or cats and dogs living together.
That's how delusions work, they normally only effect the dilussional and their enablers.
Doesn't mean delusions are good though
The total population of those states, based on 2013 estimates from the Census Bureau, is about 190 million. Just over 60 percent of the U.S. population now lives in a state where marriage equality soon will be legal.
And with Millennials coming into the mjority they stand out for voting heavily Democratic and for liberal views on many political and social issues, ranging from a belief in an activist government to support for same-sex marriage and marijuana legalization.
These findings are based on a new Pew Research Center survey conducted
Feb. 14-23, 2014 among 1,821 adults nationwide, including 617 Millennial adults, and analysis of other Pew Research Center surveys conducted between 1990 and 2014.
Millennials in Adulthood Pew Research Center s Social Demographic Trends Project
The total population of those states, based on 2013 estimates from the Census Bureau, is about 190 million. Just over 60 percent of the U.S. population now lives in a state where marriage equality soon will be legal.
And with Millennials coming into the mjority they stand out for voting heavily Democratic and for liberal views on many political and social issues, ranging from a belief in an activist government to support for same-sex marriage and marijuana legalization.
These findings are based on a new Pew Research Center survey conducted
Feb. 14-23, 2014 among 1,821 adults nationwide, including 617 Millennial adults, and analysis of other Pew Research Center surveys conducted between 1990 and 2014.
Millennials in Adulthood Pew Research Center s Social Demographic Trends Project
There's goat fuckers here also....The total population of those states, based on 2013 estimates from the Census Bureau, is about 190 million. Just over 60 percent of the U.S. population now lives in a state where marriage equality soon will be legal.
And with Millennials coming into the mjority they stand out for voting heavily Democratic and for liberal views on many political and social issues, ranging from a belief in an activist government to support for same-sex marriage and marijuana legalization.
These findings are based on a new Pew Research Center survey conducted
Feb. 14-23, 2014 among 1,821 adults nationwide, including 617 Millennial adults, and analysis of other Pew Research Center surveys conducted between 1990 and 2014.
Millennials in Adulthood Pew Research Center s Social Demographic Trends Project
Why did black (and white) college students want to do business with the Woolworth's Lunch Counter in Nashville?This is unsurprisingly ignorant.
That private organizations aren't subject to 14th Amendment jurisprudence is fundamental Constitutional doctrine.
Government has never had the authority to compel religious organizations to perform a marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple; this is not and has never been part of the issue.
Consequently there is no 'start,' 'good' or otherwise.
But yet we see lawsuits against bakers, reception halls, wedding chapels, etc for refusing to deal with gay marriages.
Tell me, why would a gay couple want to do business with anyone who does not approve of their lifestyle?
because they had that right to. BTW, republicans passed the civil rights law in spite of fillibusters from prominent democrats.
Race and sexual orientation are not the same thing. One is a result of parentage and the other is a mental condition.
The discrimination is exactly the same...right down to the language the bigots use.
Wrong again
Why did black (and white) college students want to do business with the Woolworth's Lunch Counter in Nashville?But yet we see lawsuits against bakers, reception halls, wedding chapels, etc for refusing to deal with gay marriages.
Tell me, why would a gay couple want to do business with anyone who does not approve of their lifestyle?
because they had that right to. BTW, republicans passed the civil rights law in spite of fillibusters from prominent democrats.
Race and sexual orientation are not the same thing. One is a result of parentage and the other is a mental condition.
The discrimination is exactly the same...right down to the language the bigots use.
Wrong again
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Why did black (and white) college students want to do business with the Woolworth's Lunch Counter in Nashville?
because they had that right to. BTW, republicans passed the civil rights law in spite of fillibusters from prominent democrats.
Race and sexual orientation are not the same thing. One is a result of parentage and the other is a mental condition.
The discrimination is exactly the same...right down to the language the bigots use.
Wrong again
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
What skylark says is bull and falsehoods and concoctions about what states want to do, as usual from Leftists.
what the other Ss don't git is that sexual orientation is a choice not a human condition, and in my mind in general is learned behavior for most not a natural condition.
No one on these posts has argued that gays shouldn't be able to be gay, the argument is twofold, gays should not be able to mandate how non gays should treat them and gays should not be able to destroy foundational and societal constructs.
Finally all who seem to support gaydom feel it is a more important issue than our nation. This is the divisive effect of Obama of divide and conquer, a national selfishness that has become a virus in our nation.
I've been married to my wife for 48 great years. She has been my inspiration. She advised me to take a chance and never look back when starting my own construction business. n She worked with 3rd grade students for 33 years. We had 3 wonderful kids and raised them and they are doing well. That being said, I don't see the huge issue with gay marriage. Why do some feel so threatened by it? I see it as a concocted issue.
For some folks, its a State's rights issue. For others, its a deep seeded prejudice against gays and lesbians. If their marriages are recognized as being as legally valid as straight marriages, then its harder to demean, degrade or generally treat gays and lesbians as less. As their relationships are legally equivalent. For those with less rabid prejudices against gays, gay marriage stands as one of the last societal bastions of denomralization for people and sexual acts that they consider immoral.
I thought conservatives were for less gov't interference. So why then regulate what two consenting adults do? From where are they getting their ideas from? As a lifelong Christian I don't understand their viewpoint. Please explain.
because they had that right to. BTW, republicans passed the civil rights law in spite of fillibusters from prominent democrats.
Race and sexual orientation are not the same thing. One is a result of parentage and the other is a mental condition.
The discrimination is exactly the same...right down to the language the bigots use.
Wrong again
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
“What skylark says is bull and falsehoods and concoctions about what states want to do, as usual from Leftists. And what the other Ss don't git is that sexual orientation is a choice not a human condition, and in my mind in general is learned behavior for most not a natural condition. The other point as gay activists keep up the comparisons to blacks and women voting let's separate this fraud. Being black or a women is nothing you can change or do something about. Homosexuality is fungible and many rotate between gay and straight.”
Incorrect.
The 5th Amendment's Liberty Clause protects the rights of citizens to make decisions concerning personal, private matters with regard to how one conducts his life and how one defines himself as an individual:
“The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.”
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
That one makes a choice with regard to whom he loves or wishes to marry is entitled to the same Constitutional protections as race, gender, and religious affiliation, where this choice is also immune from attack by the state.
The discrimination is exactly the same...right down to the language the bigots use.
Wrong again
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
No, the bigotry was based on a superficial trait. This is not about a superficial trait.
We KNOW mixed races can procreate. We also KNOW same sex couplings can't.
Wrong again
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
No, the bigotry was based on a superficial trait. This is not about a superficial trait.
We KNOW mixed races can procreate. We also KNOW same sex couplings can't.
You are as ignorant and bigoted as they were. They didn't see their bigotry and you don't see yours. Same bigots, different day and target. You're in fine company, bigot.
Really? Who does this sound like?
They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies not allowing their marriage.
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
No, the bigotry was based on a superficial trait. This is not about a superficial trait.
We KNOW mixed races can procreate. We also KNOW same sex couplings can't.
You are as ignorant and bigoted as they were. They didn't see their bigotry and you don't see yours. Same bigots, different day and target. You're in fine company, bigot.
Your delusions make it impossible for you to see the obvious
That is your problem.
If you can't create another enabler, THEY must be a bigot
That is the problem with enablers, the delusioned never get past the delusions.
Pity really
Geez, this is 2014.
Your delusions are out of hand SillyWytch
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
No, the bigotry was based on a superficial trait. This is not about a superficial trait.
We KNOW mixed races can procreate. We also KNOW same sex couplings can't.
You are as ignorant and bigoted as they were. They didn't see their bigotry and you don't see yours. Same bigots, different day and target. You're in fine company, bigot.
Your delusions make it impossible for you to see the obvious
That is your problem.
If you can't create another enabler, THEY must be a bigot
That is the problem with enablers, the delusioned never get past the delusions.
Pity really
The "obvious" is that procreation has never been required for civil marriage and yet you want to make it one only for gays (who can and do procreate). That makes you an anti gay bigot. Wear it proudly old fella.
That was a quote about interracial marriage, bigot. Sound familiar?
No, the bigotry was based on a superficial trait. This is not about a superficial trait.
We KNOW mixed races can procreate. We also KNOW same sex couplings can't.
You are as ignorant and bigoted as they were. They didn't see their bigotry and you don't see yours. Same bigots, different day and target. You're in fine company, bigot.
Your delusions make it impossible for you to see the obvious
That is your problem.
If you can't create another enabler, THEY must be a bigot
That is the problem with enablers, the delusioned never get past the delusions.
Pity really
The "obvious" is that procreation has never been required for civil marriage and yet you want to make it one only for gays (who can and do procreate). That makes you an anti gay bigot. Wear it proudly old fella.
What's obvious is that same sex couplings create zero children.
The fact that my kind does, makes your delusions, and your assertions laughable.