bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,027
- 280
It could have 95% support and it would still be unconstitutional. This law has absolutely no chance in court. The Constitution is crystal clear on the issue. States have no authority to make their own immigration policies, period.
They are economic policies, not immigration policies. No hiring or renting to illegal aliens. They'll use the case of identification as justification. They'll say that due to local taxes being taken out of a business and apartment, the employee or tenant must have a valid and legal ID from one of the 50 states, or a valid and current passport. Illegals have neither. City will say they can't ensure proper tax collection without knowing who is working and living in a business and apartment.
Either that, or the Obama Admin will suffer through 2 years of hundreds of lawsuits, thus backing themselves into a corner of HAVING to act on immigration..........under a 2011/2012 Republican Congress. Obama has led his admin into a massive trap with this lawsuit. Immigration will be his final blow to a loss in 2012 b/c of the corner he's backing himself into with immigration. You can't sue a state that acted since the fed wouldn't......then as the fed refuse to act.
You're just making shit up here. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You're just inventing it all on the fly. I hope doing that does a good job of making you feel better about things because it serves no other purpose. The things you just posted here have no earthly connection to the way the law works in the real world.
I was a cop for 8 years in Atlanta, 3 as a detective. I know plenty about the law and how it is applied by the "boots on the ground" and how it is argued in court. Far more than you I'm sure.