$400 million

buckeye45_73

Lakhota's my *****
Jun 4, 2011
33,567
7,077
1,130
Trump in his speech in NH, said that money will probably go back to the Clinton Foundation.......ALERT TO ALL LIBERALS......he was joking, but all jokes are based in truth!
 
I'm sure Iran will use it to sponsor more anti-Israeli terrorism.

Although lately the Iranians have been fighting ISIS too.

It just does not make sense to give Iran $400M after all these years of sanctions going back to 1979.

This payment was a huge mistake by BHO and Kerry. They should have sent a Marine Expeditionary Force instead. Sure, it would have cost more than $400M but then at least Iran would not have got to keep the money.
 
theo2.jpg
 
Trump in his speech in NH, said that money will probably go back to the Clinton Foundation.......ALERT TO ALL LIBERALS......he was joking, but all jokes are based in truth!


A joke has a premise. A set up, and then surprise payoff based on reversal of expectations.

Trump is not bright enough to make jokes. HIs supporters are not bright enough to know that he's completely misrepresented the facts on this story.
 
Trump in his speech in NH, said that money will probably go back to the Clinton Foundation.......ALERT TO ALL LIBERALS......he was joking, but all jokes are based in truth!


A joke has a premise. A set up, and then surprise payoff based on reversal of expectations.

Trump is not bright enough to make jokes. HIs supporters are not bright enough to know that he's completely misrepresented the facts on this story.

and you continue to make us laugh, thanks.
 
I'm sure Iran will use it to sponsor more anti-Israeli terrorism.

Although lately the Iranians have been fighting ISIS too.

It just does not make sense to give Iran $400M after all these years of sanctions going back to 1979.

This payment was a huge mistake by BHO and Kerry. They should have sent a Marine Expeditionary Force instead. Sure, it would have cost more than $400M but then at least Iran would not have got to keep the money.

His own DOJ advised against it. I did read in Fortune Magazine that there was a law suit working its way through some sort of international court. It is said that the obama administration was worried that they would be awarded billions not millions so they settled. Which sounds fine and dandy.

But, why on the same day, doesn't make sense.

The Iranians who they tell us to trust say it was ransom. The Iranians already knew they were going to get the money, the only question was how much more.

Are we really obligated to some sort of international court?

The DOJ told them not to do it the same day it would look badly, the Kenyan knew he didn't need to care and I will bet he is right.
 
Trump in his speech in NH, said that money will probably go back to the Clinton Foundation.......ALERT TO ALL LIBERALS......he was joking, but all jokes are based in truth!


A joke has a premise. A set up, and then surprise payoff based on reversal of expectations.

Trump is not bright enough to make jokes. HIs supporters are not bright enough to know that he's completely misrepresented the facts on this story.


No he's way smarter than you or uh uh uh uh obama....sorry if you can't take a joke...but that's why I put the disclamor...thanks for proving me right racist hazlnut
 
Last edited:
Trump in his speech in NH, said that money will probably go back to the Clinton Foundation.......ALERT TO ALL LIBERALS......he was joking, but all jokes are based in truth!
That would be good since the Clinton Foundation helps people all over the world.
Trump wouldn't know about that since he screws over people all over the world:

USA TODAY exclusive: Hundreds allege Donald Trump doesn’t pay his bills

Dozens of lawsuits accuse Trump of not paying his bills, reports claim | Fox News

Reports: Donald Trump stiffs contractors - CNNPolitics.com

Report: Trump has refused to pay hundreds of workers

You know if he does it here, he does it everywhere.
 
And now the Obama Administration has officially admitted that the $400 million to Iran was ransom money for hotstages....:eusa_whistle:


State Dept. spox confirms U.S. sent money to Iran after hostages were released

No they didn't. Why are you lying.

Iraq paid the US for goods back when the Shah was in power. When they captured our embassy personal, and then Reagan gave them guns for those hostages, that was paying ransom since the guns were ours.

But the original money wasn't ever ours. We couldn't keep it forever according to international law. So we swapped their property for our people. Their property being their money.

Paid implies you spent your own money to buy something. But that money wasn't ever ours.

Can't you understand?
 
And now the Obama Administration has officially admitted that the $400 million to Iran was ransom money for hotstages....:eusa_whistle:


State Dept. spox confirms U.S. sent money to Iran after hostages were released

No they didn't. Why are you lying.

Iraq paid the US for goods back when the Shah was in power. When they captured our embassy personal, and then Reagan gave them guns for those hostages, that was paying ransom since the guns were ours.

But the original money wasn't ever ours. We couldn't keep it forever according to international law. So we swapped their property for our people. Their property being their money.

Paid implies you spent your own money to buy something. But that money wasn't ever ours.

Can't you understand?

Perhaps you should have watched the video, stupid. Because that's exactly what they did. They admitted it. Nobody believes you anymore rdean - so I don't even know why you try. You've told too many lies and you try to dispute video.

As far as your lame ass liberal story about the money and "international law" - first of all, why didn't Bill Clinton give it back to them during the 90's? Why didn't Obama give it back to them in 2009? Or 2010? Or 2011? Or 2012? Or when he was re-elected in 2013? Or 2014? Or even 2015? So bizarre that it just "happened" to occur in 2016 when they had hostages of ours and when they were mysteriously releasing them.

Secondly - what "international law"? We don't answer to any "international law". We are a soverign nation accountable to nobody else. No "global court" could subpoena us, require us to attend a trial, or pay anything.

You've got from pathetic to just plain pitiful on this issue deany. You're so desperate to protect your precious little progressives that you can't accept reality in the face of indisputable evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top