21st Century Emily Posts: Little Girls Scream F-Words for LGBT T-Shirt "Good Cause"

[WinterBorn]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

I get that you might see teaching these girls to say "Fuck" as child abuse. I think it shows you haven't seen real child abuse, but I can see where you might think it.

But pedophilia?? lmao How the hell did you get that?

The content and attitude conveyed was very sexual. For an adult to intentionally coax that from a kid is pedophilia.

Absolute horseshit. There was nothing sexual about the video. They were ranting about things that are wrong. If you were sexually aroused, then YOU have a problem.

 

[WinterBorn]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

While I would not approve of teaching children to use profanities- how specifically is a child harmed?

Would you arrest parents that swear around their children- especially since kids learn most of their vocabularly from the parents.

And since I didn't see the video- please help me understand what about that video you consider to be 'pedophilia'.

Adults coaxing little girls to say boobs, butt, fuck, rape and penis for a video.

I guess if you totally ignore the context, you could ALMOST have a point. The words were used in the context of the rants against the inequality in our society.

 

[WinterBorn]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

While I would not approve of teaching children to use profanities- how specifically is a child harmed?

Would you arrest parents that swear around their children- especially since kids learn most of their vocabularly from the parents.

And since I didn't see the video- please help me understand what about that video you consider to be 'pedophilia'.

Adults coaxing little girls to say boobs, butt, fuck, rape and penis for a video.

Sexual??? WTF? They were ranting about how women are not treated fairly. How is that sexual? Is the simple use of a word sexual?

I don't know about you, but when I hear someone say "Fuck that!", it does not turn me on. And it is not sexual.

 

[Iceweasel]

I see it as proof that some Conservatives can't even manage to explain how this is abusive.

We did but your elevator was stuck in the basement I guess. The language is appalling enough, you don't think they are going to keep using the words and teach the other kids? Plus the clothes is not for kids. For me the biggest abuse is shamelessly using them to propagandize their militant agenda when they hardly understand the issues.

Militant agenda??? WTF?

The video speaks out against treating women like they are helpless.
The video speaks out against sexist and inequality.
The video speaks out against 1 in 5 women being beaten or raped.
The video speaks out against men justifying rape because of what the girl was wearing.
The video speaks out against teaching girls that being pretty is the most important thing she can do.

If that is a militant agenda then we, as a society, need to adopt this militant agenda across the board.

And just as an FYI, when my daughters were pre-teens, they understood that rape is wrong. They understand that people doing the same job should be paid the same, regardless of their genitalia.

And thanks to what they were taught by their mothers and me, they understood that being pretty is not the most important thing they can do, and that they are never helpless unless they choose to be. My sons knew the same things at that age.

What a blowhorn. I'm glad your daughters figured out rape was wrong by the time they were pre-teens, gee, no one else has thought of that.

Is abusing women controversial where you live? Why don't we get a bunch of little boys together and let them scream vulgarities how sick it is for women to play mind games and drop the passive aggressive horseshit. And that they have been payed the same since around the 60s.

 

[Syriusly]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

While I would not approve of teaching children to use profanities- how specifically is a child harmed?

Would you arrest parents that swear around their children- especially since kids learn most of their vocabularly from the parents.

And since I didn't see the video- please help me understand what about that video you consider to be 'pedophilia'.

Adults coaxing little girls to say boobs, butt, fuck, rape and penis for a video.

Sexual??? WTF? They were ranting about how women are not treated fairly. How is that sexual? Is the simple use of a word sexual?

I don't know about you, but when I hear someone say "Fuck that!", it does not turn me on. And it is not sexual.

I wonder if any of the outraged here have ever yelled "Fuck You!"- and thought of that as a sexual offer?

 

[Syriusly]

I see it as proof that some Conservatives can't even manage to explain how this is abusive.

We did but your elevator was stuck in the basement I guess. The language is appalling enough, you don't think they are going to keep using the words and teach the other kids? Plus the clothes is not for kids. For me the biggest abuse is shamelessly using them to propagandize their militant agenda when they hardly understand the issues.

Maybe Conservatives have a different definition of abuse than I do.

Abuse: treat (a person or an animal) with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly.

How were these girls abused? What harm did these girls suffer?

 

[DriftingSand]

Time to start fighting fire with fire. Just make ours hotter. It worked way, back when.

 

[asaratis]

Makes me wanna donate!

uh....these are 6-13 year olds. That comment could be taken very much the WRONG way. Just sayin'.

That poster knows full well how old the girls are in the video. And so knowing, answered the way s/he did.

Oh, get fuckin' serious! The message is spot on! It's all the fucked up fuckers fuckin' with double standards and downright self righteous moral edicts that exacerbate the date rapes, random rapes and sexual assaults (too often leading to murder) on young girls.

I'd donate to their cause in a minute. I'm a Batman type...a protector of children and ladies. Men are on their own.

Firstly, you should realize that the stars of the show did not write the script. Their parents did. Their parents likely signed releases and all kinds of legal documents permitting their little darlin's to be in the video.

Secondly, if you take the 'fuck' out of it and listen to the words, you realize that their 'fucks' were well placed, appropriately emphasized and quite affective.

There were several good points made. I would go back and listen again to make a list for you, but it's time to rearrange my playing cards.

 

[Syriusly]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

While I would not approve of teaching children to use profanities- how specifically is a child harmed?

Would you arrest parents that swear around their children- especially since kids learn most of their vocabularly from the parents.

And since I didn't see the video- please help me understand what about that video you consider to be 'pedophilia'.

Adults coaxing little girls to say boobs, butt, fuck, rape and penis for a video.

I see your words- but I have to say you haven't helped me understand why you consider getting girls to say those words 'pedophilia'

Pedophilia technically is the desire for sex with children- but I will assume that you don't consider it to be the technical definition, but are generally saying you consider this to be child sexual assault.

But that still doesn't make any sense.

Do you think that video was intended to make you sexually aroused? Do you think these girls were harmed in some specific sexual way?

As the father of a child- my child learned how to correctly name body parts at a young age- clearly that isn't harmful. While we didn't teach the words Fuck or Rape at this young of an age, I am still struggling to figure out how you think the children were harmed.

 

[WinterBorn]

I see it as proof that some Conservatives can't even manage to explain how this is abusive.

We did but your elevator was stuck in the basement I guess. The language is appalling enough, you don't think they are going to keep using the words and teach the other kids? Plus the clothes is not for kids. For me the biggest abuse is shamelessly using them to propagandize their militant agenda when they hardly understand the issues.

Militant agenda??? WTF?

The video speaks out against treating women like they are helpless.
The video speaks out against sexist and inequality.
The video speaks out against 1 in 5 women being beaten or raped.
The video speaks out against men justifying rape because of what the girl was wearing.
The video speaks out against teaching girls that being pretty is the most important thing she can do.

If that is a militant agenda then we, as a society, need to adopt this militant agenda across the board.

And just as an FYI, when my daughters were pre-teens, they understood that rape is wrong. They understand that people doing the same job should be paid the same, regardless of their genitalia.

And thanks to what they were taught by their mothers and me, they understood that being pretty is not the most important thing they can do, and that they are never helpless unless they choose to be. My sons knew the same things at that age.

What a blowhorn. I'm glad your daughters figured out rape was wrong by the time they were pre-teens, gee, no one else has thought of that.

Is abusing women controversial where you live? Why don't we get a bunch of little boys together and let them scream vulgarities how sick it is for women to play mind games and drop the passive aggressive horseshit. And that they have been payed the same since around the 60s.

Congrats, you addressed one point. I guess its easier to ignore the rest. Makes being indignant so much easier.

Here is another news flash for ya. I raised 4 children to adulthood. None of them were allowed to use profanity.

Of the 4, only one doesn't use profanity now (except the occasional "dammit" while watching a football game). So it isn't about them never using these words, but about them using them a bit sooner and to make a point.

Besides, if the parents are ok with it, why should anyone else have a say?

 

[Syriusly]

This borders on child abuse but as I've stated many times on this board, there's no level to which Democrats won't stoop.

No borderline to it. Straight up child abuse. And pedophilia.
But that's the left in a nut bag.

I get that you might see teaching these girls to say "Fuck" as child abuse. I think it shows you haven't seen real child abuse, but I can see where you might think it.

But pedophilia?? lmao How the hell did you get that?

The content and attitude conveyed was very sexual. For an adult to intentionally coax that from a kid is pedophilia.

So you think this was child porn?

If you really do, then you should report it to the police.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I have watched maybe three non-music videos in 62 months. So, no, I didn't.

Tell me what is wrong with the video, and don't ignore that you are a potty mouth.

Thank you for admitting you're ok with it. BTW, there is a difference between an adult using profanity with other adults, and adults coaching 8 and 9 year olds to use profanity. I guess in your twisted mind, you can't see the difference.

S. J. translation: folks who don't watch videos accept what's in them even though I won't tell them what's in them when asked to do.

Any adult who uses foul language that is using is a hypocrite.

So, tell us what is in the video.

 

[JakeStarkey]

S. J. is a far right droid not a true conservative.

Pathetic sniveling S. J. droid.

 

[WinterBorn]

I notice that those condemning the language and those who defend the video are not bothering to correct Silhouette's interpretation that this is about LBGT.

I guess accuracy isn't critical.

 

[Silhouette]

I wonder if any of the outraged here have ever yelled "Fuck You!"- and thought of that as a sexual offer?

Apples and oranges. The question and issue of this thread is using young children to do vulgar things in order to promote a political agenda of any kind. Whether or not the agenda is benevolent isn't the question here.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I wonder if any of the outraged here have ever yelled "Fuck You!"- and thought of that as a sexual offer?

Apples and oranges. The question and issue of this thread is using young children to do vulgar things in order to promote a political agenda of any kind. Whether or not the agenda is benevolent isn't the question here.

Translated: the champion of the false analogy calls "apples and oranges" for getting a comparison correctly? Utter, rank hypocrisy.

Sil is merely upset that the anti-marriage equality conspiracy and political agenda has failed.

 

[Jarlaxle]

I notice that those condemning the language and those who defend the video are not bothering to correct Silhouette's interpretation that this is about LBGT.

I guess accuracy isn't critical.

I suspect more than a few of them have Silly on ignore.

 

[S.J.]

I see it as proof that some Conservatives can't even manage to explain how this is abusive.

We did but your elevator was stuck in the basement I guess. The language is appalling enough, you don't think they are going to keep using the words and teach the other kids? Plus the clothes is not for kids. For me the biggest abuse is shamelessly using them to propagandize their militant agenda when they hardly understand the issues.

Militant agenda??? WTF?

The video speaks out against treating women like they are helpless.
The video speaks out against sexist and inequality.
The video speaks out against 1 in 5 women being beaten or raped.
The video speaks out against men justifying rape because of what the girl was wearing.
The video speaks out against teaching girls that being pretty is the most important thing she can do.

If that is a militant agenda then we, as a society, need to adopt this militant agenda across the board.

And just as an FYI, when my daughters were pre-teens, they understood that rape is wrong. They understand that people doing the same job should be paid the same, regardless of their genitalia.

And thanks to what they were taught by their mothers and me, they understood that being pretty is not the most important thing they can do, and that they are never helpless unless they choose to be. My sons knew the same things at that age.

Did you coax and encourage them to say "fuck" repeatedly too, or talk like a hooker? You liberals are disgusting.

 

[S.J.]

S. J. is a far right droid not a true conservative.

Pathetic sniveling S. J. droid.

A morally bankrupt poser such as yourself wouldn't know what a true conservative is. This thread illustrates how low liberal creeps like you are willing to stoop to defend your immoral friends on the left.

 

[WinterBorn]

I wonder if any of the outraged here have ever yelled "Fuck You!"- and thought of that as a sexual offer?

Apples and oranges. The question and issue of this thread is using young children to do vulgar things in order to promote a political agenda of any kind. Whether or not the agenda is benevolent isn't the question here.

I guess whether they are protesting inequality for women or an LGBT cause doesn't matter either?