2017 Co2 watch thread--How high will it go?

This thread is only for data...God, how dumb are you people.

Recent Daily Average Mauna Loa CO2

November 19: 404.29 ppm
November 18: 403.18 ppm
November 17: 404.23 ppm
November 16: 404.70 ppm
November 15: 404.70 ppm
But you don't believe in God, Matthew.
 
Is the OP able to show us where anybody is giving a fuck about this?

Links please!!! :boobies::boobies:

I don't give a fuck what you say...

Millions of people give a fuck about the rise of co2 and its greenhouse effects on our climate...
Matthew, I believe you are right. Sell your car and your house. Go live off of the land, but please don't make fires to cook your food. Just eat it raw.
 
Ah, here we go again. Ding. So you have reached down into the toilet of 'Conservative' arguments to pull out the old 'go live in a cave' stupidity. Well, you have already demonstrated your lack of intellect, so that is not surprising.

Actually, GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge, and excellent car for urban driving. And, of course, you have the Tesla's, S, X, and 3. In fact, Tesla, Porsche, and Mercedes are having meetings working on a faster charging system than even the Tesla Supercharger that will work for all three manufactures car and truck lines.

As the price of the batteries come down, and the power density goes up, you will see the EV's take over from the ICE's. And, within two decades, I think you will see oil used as an industrial stock, not for fuel. And then we will have no reason to drill for more, we will have plenty with existing fields.

Wind, solar, and geo-thermal will power our civilization, and spread the profits out among many, rather than just a few at the top.
 
Ah, here we go again. Ding. So you have reached down into the toilet of 'Conservative' arguments to pull out the old 'go live in a cave' stupidity. Well, you have already demonstrated your lack of intellect, so that is not surprising.

Actually, GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge, and excellent car for urban driving. And, of course, you have the Tesla's, S, X, and 3. In fact, Tesla, Porsche, and Mercedes are having meetings working on a faster charging system than even the Tesla Supercharger that will work for all three manufactures car and truck lines.

As the price of the batteries come down, and the power density goes up, you will see the EV's take over from the ICE's. And, within two decades, I think you will see oil used as an industrial stock, not for fuel. And then we will have no reason to drill for more, we will have plenty with existing fields.

Wind, solar, and geo-thermal will power our civilization, and spread the profits out among many, rather than just a few at the top.

GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge

We'll need to burn more coal.
 
Ah, here we go again. Ding. So you have reached down into the toilet of 'Conservative' arguments to pull out the old 'go live in a cave' stupidity. Well, you have already demonstrated your lack of intellect, so that is not surprising.

Actually, GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge, and excellent car for urban driving. And, of course, you have the Tesla's, S, X, and 3. In fact, Tesla, Porsche, and Mercedes are having meetings working on a faster charging system than even the Tesla Supercharger that will work for all three manufactures car and truck lines.

As the price of the batteries come down, and the power density goes up, you will see the EV's take over from the ICE's. And, within two decades, I think you will see oil used as an industrial stock, not for fuel. And then we will have no reason to drill for more, we will have plenty with existing fields.

Wind, solar, and geo-thermal will power our civilization, and spread the profits out among many, rather than just a few at the top.
What is YOUR carbon footprint, hypocrite?
 
Ah, here we go again. Ding. So you have reached down into the toilet of 'Conservative' arguments to pull out the old 'go live in a cave' stupidity. Well, you have already demonstrated your lack of intellect, so that is not surprising.

Actually, GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge, and excellent car for urban driving. And, of course, you have the Tesla's, S, X, and 3. In fact, Tesla, Porsche, and Mercedes are having meetings working on a faster charging system than even the Tesla Supercharger that will work for all three manufactures car and truck lines.

As the price of the batteries come down, and the power density goes up, you will see the EV's take over from the ICE's. And, within two decades, I think you will see oil used as an industrial stock, not for fuel. And then we will have no reason to drill for more, we will have plenty with existing fields.

Wind, solar, and geo-thermal will power our civilization, and spread the profits out among many, rather than just a few at the top.

GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge

We'll need to burn more coal.
Not at all. We will burn more natural gas for a while, but as the grid scale storage comes on line, we will burn less of that and use more wind and solar. Coal is dead, and bankruptcy is burying the coal companies.
 
Ah, here we go again. Ding. So you have reached down into the toilet of 'Conservative' arguments to pull out the old 'go live in a cave' stupidity. Well, you have already demonstrated your lack of intellect, so that is not surprising.

Actually, GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge, and excellent car for urban driving. And, of course, you have the Tesla's, S, X, and 3. In fact, Tesla, Porsche, and Mercedes are having meetings working on a faster charging system than even the Tesla Supercharger that will work for all three manufactures car and truck lines.

As the price of the batteries come down, and the power density goes up, you will see the EV's take over from the ICE's. And, within two decades, I think you will see oil used as an industrial stock, not for fuel. And then we will have no reason to drill for more, we will have plenty with existing fields.

Wind, solar, and geo-thermal will power our civilization, and spread the profits out among many, rather than just a few at the top.

GM has a nice EV out now that has over 200 miles range on a charge

We'll need to burn more coal.
Not at all. We will burn more natural gas for a while, but as the grid scale storage comes on line, we will burn less of that and use more wind and solar. Coal is dead, and bankruptcy is burying the coal companies.

So we can build twice as much unreliable solar to charge the batteries so that we can use the batteries at night to charge the EV batteries. Cool!
 
November 25: 405.42 ppm


405.42ppm in late Nov is higher then the peak in 2015. That is monthly, weekly and I believe also daily.

Your posts keep releasing CO2. You should be ashamed!

All life does...Just that we shouldn't be dumb enough to release all the green house gases as occurred 250 million years ago in the great dying.

====On topic===

Co2 levels are over 3.1 to 3.2ppm over last year...410ppm is a very real possibility for the monthly peak.
 
Last edited:
November 25: 405.42 ppm


405.42ppm in late Nov is higher then the peak in 2015. That is monthly, weekly and I believe also daily.
Yes, we have hit the point where the previous years high are going to be comparable to this years lows. And, somewhere along the line, the permafrost and clathrates are going to start making significant contributions.
 
November 25: 405.42 ppm


405.42ppm in late Nov is higher then the peak in 2015. That is monthly, weekly and I believe also daily.
Yes, we have hit the point where the previous years high are going to be comparable to this years lows. And, somewhere along the line, the permafrost and clathrates are going to start making significant contributions.
What is YOUR carbon footprint, hypocrite?
 
And what relevance do you think that has to the thread topic? Do you have some threshold in mind above which one is not allowed to participate in the conversation?
 
And what relevance do you think that has to the thread topic? Do you have some threshold in mind above which one is not allowed to participate in the conversation?
It goes to the character of the witness. If you religious fanatics really believed your own dogma your actions would match your words.
 

Forum List

Back
Top