Concerned American
Diamond Member
OK, link to that criminal code, Winnie.Cover Up dude.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OK, link to that criminal code, Winnie.Cover Up dude.
Sounds like a Cohen problemcatch and kill is not a crime by itself.
falsifying business records to cover it up, is a crime.
donations by individuals are limited to $2500 and not $130k which Cohen initially took a mortgage to payoff Stormy to be silent, for Trump's campaign run.
In kind campaign donations by businesses like the N/E are limited also, and must be reported under campaign finance law
- Turley is also getting paid as a Fox News Contributor...Unlike you, Turley is a constitutional scholar. Please link to your credentials.
Oh, sorry I had more important things, and ignored you for a moment.Yeah, there is. What do you think the subject of this OP is, Winnie? Maybe you should bone up on your reading and comprehension skills. It would help you stay on topic.
Nice try--irrelevant as to his qualifications to express that opinion, but a nice try just the same. Fits in well with your gossip. What qualifications did you say you had that put you in a position to question his opinion?- Turley is also getting paid as a Fox News Contributor...
- the article was an opinion, not a scholarly constitutional article....
What was the subject of Turley's opinion, Winnie? That's right, Trump's sham trial. LOL, a failed WA state faux educator questions the qualifications of a highly regarded constitutional scholar from George Washington University School of Law. LOL, keep at it, Winnie, you exhibit your LACK OF QUALIFICATIONS with every post.Oh, sorry I had more important things, and ignored you for a moment.
The topic was the fraud Turley........Dear Lord.....Is he the BEST you got?
Yeah, he was just charged with financial records fraud for the cover up of the campaign finance law crimes committed by Cohen for Trump.Sounds like a Cohen problem
Trumps not charged with violating any campaign fin laws.
YAWN. Charges. Let us know when any of these unsubstantiated charges result in a criminal conviction.Yeah, he was just charged with financial records fraud for the cover up of the campaign finance law crimes committed by Cohen for Trump.
Turley says what the cult wants to hear, so he can keep cashing checks.- Turley is also getting paid as a Fox News Contributor...
- the article was an opinion, not a scholarly constitutional article....
This case has already been decided. The jury is bought and paid for.And a case bought and paid for by George Soros.
Just a miserable matter that any judge with an ounce of fairness would have tossed by now.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley on Friday said the prosecution’s case against former President Donald Trump is failing as a key witness is benefiting the defense.... The prosecution’s first witness, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, was helpful to Trump as the prosecution made mistakes that the defense capitalized on during cross-examination, Turley asserted on Fox News’ “Outnumbered.”“It’s a breakdown in the courtroom. They have a witness that is disassembling in front of them,” Turley said. “The prosecution never revealed to the jury in the direct that Pecker had actually killed stories for other celebrities, that he had been working on stories two decades before the election with Trump that he was suppressing. And now it’s only getting worse. Yesterday was really bad In terms of the cross-examination for the prosecution. Today is much worse. I mean, here Pecker is saying that Trump didn’t want to purchase the story. Yesterday when he asked him about reimbursing Cohen, he said he didn’t know anything about that.”...“I think the defense is doing a very good job, but I have to say that this is collapsing on its own weight,” he added. “You just have to stand back and let it fall. Just asking simple questions that the jury would want to know has left serious damage for the prosecution. These are not strange tangential questions, these are questions you would’ve expected the prosecution to ask as just the completion of their line of questioning. Like was Donald Trump the only one you did this for, when did you start to do this?”Despite Pecker’s testimony not damaging Trump, former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy on Friday suggested Judge Juan Merchan’s friendliness toward Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg could lead to jury bias against the former president.“It’s one thing to be watching the trial through the media, if you are watching it on our channel, you hear me. You hear Kerry Kupec, you hear Jonathan Turley talk about the weaknesses of the case,” McCarthy said. “The jury is not getting that filter. The jury is getting the district attorney’s version of events and taking its cues from a judge who has been very friendly to the district attorney. So if you’re watching this with legal commentary, you know they’re not really proving a conspiracy in there and don’t really have federal campaign finance in there. But I don’t know that the jury knows that.”
"Stand Back and Let It Fall": Jonathan Turley Says Alvin Bragg's Case Against Trump Is "Collapsing" After Witness Testimony - 🔔 The Liberty Daily
If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (DCNF)—George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley on Friday said the prosecution’s case against former President Donald Trump is failing as a key witness is benefiting the defense. Trump is on trial facing 34 felony...thelibertydaily.com
Yeah quite a stretch thereYeah, he was just charged with financial records fraud for the cover up of the campaign finance law crimes committed by Cohen for Trump.
That's what trials are for....and in this one, it is only the very beginning of a scheduled trial for 4 to 6 weeks estimate.YAWN. Charges. Let us know when any of these unsubstantiated charges result in a criminal conviction.
Like all of the other legal proceedings against him in the past seven years--they are grasping at straws.Yeah quite a stretch there
Good of you to recognize that. He is innocent until PROVEN guilty. Now if you would just stop slandering him with irrelevant gossip.That's what trials are for....and in this one, it is only the very beginning of a scheduled trial for 4 to 6 weeks estimate.
Not a stretch....the business financial crimes charged with, only involve the re- payment to Cohen for the hush money paid to Stormy.Yeah quite a stretch there
You mean the Marla scandal??? That is not slander silly one....Good of you to recognize that. He is innocent until PROVEN guilty. Now if you would just stop slandering him with irrelevant gossip.
Wow, talk about a stretch. Inflammatory descriptors aside, purchasing an account of an alleged affair in order to keep slander out of the news is hardly "hush money."Not a stretch....the business financial crimes charged with, only involve the re- payment to Cohen for the hush money paid to Stormy.
Naw, and it is not illegal either. Gossip monger.You mean the Marla scandal??? That is not slander silly one....
Yes, because he paid his lawyer legal feesNot a stretch....the business financial crimes charged with, only involve the re- payment to Cohen for the hush money paid to Stormy.