LAUGHatLEFTISTS
Diamond Member
- Jan 22, 2020
- 20,116
- 18,419
- 2,290
How does free childcare differ from free K-12 education?
.
Great point. There is no difference. Neither of them are free.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does free childcare differ from free K-12 education?
.
Those who escaped communism are aware that government provided child care is indoctrination without saying indoctrination out loud.Governor of NM just implemented this. Let’s watch her failure to estimate what a flop NY will be.
Government help for working class families: truly terrible. Tax breaks for billionaires: good idea!
MAGA needs to build another marble bathroom.
/—-/ Juvenile non response.All of it.
He isn't doing that anymore. He won the election..
See: Mamdani’s Free Childcare Plan Is the New Progressive Test Case
"Mamdani’s proposal for free citywide childcare could reset the conversation about what local government owes working families. He advocates for public responsibility for basic needs like care and food access, proposing city-owned grocery stores to combat food deserts and rising prices."
For Mamdani’s free childcare to become a reality in New York City, Mamdani would have to end the NYC’s 3% Plus income tax on NYC’s hard working wage earners paychecks.
Has Mamdani proposed to end confiscating the 3% plus New York City’s income tax on NYC’s poor working families?
JWK
Mamdani’s strategy, like the Democrat Party Leadership’s game plan, is to lie, distort, deflect and project an illusionary picture to gain support. This strategy is based on the self-evident truth that a lie and misrepresentations will circle the earth before the truth gets its shoes on.
How many Chinese have lost their lives at the hands of their government in order to create the current number of Chinese billionaires?You are of course referring to foreign lives taken to make those fortunes, as has been proven historically inherent in communist countries that they take the lives of their own to amass the wealth of the party and its members.
Finance capitalism cannot exist in a communist country because pure communism fundamentally opposes private ownership and profit motives.Who else would it serve under communism?
Why? how many are acceptable? Look it up in the "little red book"...from the cultural revolution to the famines to forced planned parenthood a safe bet would be 10's of millions of lives were taken/lost to the communists, whereas human life is the driving force for the capitalist engine.How many Chinese have lost their lives at the hands of their government in order to create the current number of Chinese billionaires?
proving by your own admission v-this-v was a bogus claim...Finance capitalism cannot exist in a communist country because pure communism fundamentally opposes private ownership and profit motives.
As it applies to the US and China, Finance capital controls government in the former and government controls finance capitalists in the latter.
...I was merely pointing that out, and you have now admitted as much...as I said, you can feel your argument taking on waterThere is a nugget of truth in your take on China's tax policy in that finance capital serves the government in Beijing
The Cultural Revolution ended in 1976; over the past 30 years China has risen to rival the influence of the US and UK empires without killing, maiming, and displacing millions of innocent civilians on the opposite side of the planet.Why? how many are acceptable? Look it up in the "little red book"...from the cultural revolution to the famines to forced planned parenthood a safe bet would be 10's of millions of lives were taken/lost to the communists, whereas human life is the driving force for the capitalist engine.
And he is charging $13 for a beer . . . not very affordable for the free cheese rats who voted for him.He isn't doing that anymore. He won the election.
That's because alcohol is banned in Islam and he wants to stop it's sales before he converts NYC to Sharia law.And he is charging $13 for a beer . . . not very affordable for the free cheese rats who voted for him.
![]()
Zohran Mamdani’s push to make NYC ‘affordable’ doesn’t extend to victory party — with $13 beers at pricey bar
The steep prices at the party wasn’t lost on critics of the Democratic socialist.nypost.com
JWK
We are not a capitalist system as falsely asserted by Fox News personalities. Our founders provided for a free enterprise, free market system, a small part of which involves capitalism . . . the investment of monetary assets to achieve a desired goal.
You keep saying "on the other side of the planet" because communists have been responsible for far more deaths on their own side of the planet.The Cultural Revolution ended in 1976; over the past 30 years China has risen to rival the influence of the US and UK empires without killing, maiming, and displacing millions of innocent civilians on the opposite side of the planet.
And in just a little over 100 years communists have wrested that title away [which is why you needed to clue in 500 years instead of 100], but since it is all in the name of "the people" instead of money the socially educated are on board with it and in defense of it they promote it...as I have said, the right kill foreigners, the left kill their own...and you have helped make that case and point...albeit with an assist from intelligence that does seem quite artificial.For the last 500 years, "the driving force of the capitalist engine" has been war and debt with tens of millions murdered in pursuit of private fortunes.
Polm Pot, Stalin, Mao et al had a term for that..."a slow day""The total death toll, including indirect deaths from war's long-term effects, is at least 4.5 to 4.7 million and continues to rise."
Nobody has ever killed like greedy white-supremacist capitalists:Polm Pot, Stalin, Mao et al had a term for that..."a slow day"
Millions of indigenous people in North America have died as a result US policies, wars, forced removals, and introduced diseases since 1776; separating direct killings by the US government from indirect deaths like starvation, displacement, or exposure is more complex.You keep saying "on the other side of the planet" because communists have been responsible for far more deaths on their own side of the planet.
Capitalist were responsible for two world wars in the last hundred years that took the lives of tens of millions. American capitalists have killed millions more since 1945 in Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Iraq, and Afghanistan with no end in sight; clean up your own house before worrying about other human rights violations.And in just a little over 100 years communists have wrested that title away [which is why you needed to clue in 500 years instead of 100], but since it is all in the name of "the people" instead of money the socially educated are on board with it and in defense of it they promote it...as I have said, the right kill foreigners, the left kill their own...and you have helped make that case and point...albeit with an assist from intelligence that does seem quite artificial.
Nobody has ever killed like greedy white-supremacist capitalists:
Britain’s century long Opium trafficking and China’s ‘Century of Humiliation’ (1839-1949) - MR Online
"In 1500, India and China were the world’s most advanced civilizations.
"Then came the Europeans.
"They eventually looted and wreaked havoc on both, just as they were to on the Americas and Africa.
"For India and China, Britain was the chief culprit, relying on state-sponsored drug-running backed by industrialized military power.
"The British Empire was the world’s largest producer and exporter of Opium—the main product of global trade after the gradual decline of the slave trade from Africa..."
"Britain taxed away 50% of the value of Indian peasants’ food crops to push them out of agriculture into growing Opium.
"This soon led to the Bengal famine of 1770, when ten million, a third of the Bengali population, starved to death.
"Britain took no action to aid them, as they did almost a century later with their orchestrated famine in Ireland.
"Another famine hit India in 1783, and again Britain did nothing as 11 million starved. Between 1760-1943..."
Millions of indigenous people in North America have died as a result US policies, wars, forced removals, and introduced diseases since 1776; separating direct killings by the US government from indirect deaths like starvation, displacement, or exposure is more complex.
TRANSLATION: "And that is why we need to confiscate your wealth"Capitalist were responsible for two world wars in the last hundred years that took the lives of tens of millions. American capitalists have killed millions more since 1945 in Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Iraq, and Afghanistan with no end in sight; clean up your own house before worrying about other human rights violations.
Because the richest one percent have bribed the best government money can buy to steal $50 Trillion from productive Americans over the past few decades.TRANSLATION: "And that is why we need to confiscate your wealth"
TRANSLATION: "Confiscate the wealth in the name of the people and it magically/semantically goes from 'theft' to 'fair share' "Because the richest one percent have bribed the best government money can buy to steal $50 Trillion from productive Americans over the past few decades.
and of course the way to stop "this kind of theft" is to institute your own type.