- Sep 16, 2012
- 60,976
- 54,909
- 3,605
Wow.
I could see Google attacking just about everyone. When Twitter attacked the NY post, I thought that was a bridge too far. . . and now? Google attacking Sky News in Australia, simply for having a differing opinion?
For the love of all liberty and freedom. . . what the holy hell?
". . . This human right to be free to share your opinions through “any media”, whether it be criticisms of government policy, or disputing conventional thinking, is nearly absolute.
But it is also fickle.
And – if we allow it – easily snuffed out like many leaders have done before.
Sky News Australia has been temporarily suspended from posting on the Google-owned platform YouTube for publishing opinion content the tech giant disagrees with.
Among the videos deemed unpalatable for societal consumption were debates around whether masks were effective and whether lockdowns were justified when considering their adverse health outcomes.. . "
I could see Google attacking just about everyone. When Twitter attacked the NY post, I thought that was a bridge too far. . . and now? Google attacking Sky News in Australia, simply for having a differing opinion?
For the love of all liberty and freedom. . . what the holy hell?
YouTube’s Sky News Australia suspension ‘disturbing’ assault on freedom of thought
YouTube’s Sky News Australia suspension ‘disturbing’ assault on freedom of thought
The freedom to engage in debate and challenge conventional thinking and wisdoms were not always accepted as human rights.
www.skynews.com.au
". . . This human right to be free to share your opinions through “any media”, whether it be criticisms of government policy, or disputing conventional thinking, is nearly absolute.
But it is also fickle.
And – if we allow it – easily snuffed out like many leaders have done before.
Sky News Australia has been temporarily suspended from posting on the Google-owned platform YouTube for publishing opinion content the tech giant disagrees with.
Among the videos deemed unpalatable for societal consumption were debates around whether masks were effective and whether lockdowns were justified when considering their adverse health outcomes.. . "