Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So long as you're aware of who precisely it is who makes the central government's highest paid minion and prime aggressor toward the founding principles of our Republic tremble like a little bitch, that's all that matters.
It's none of the establishment republicans.
But you already know that. Right, Mac?
Heh heh.
This has nothing to do with Trump, but it appears the TDS has irreparable damage you and Mac.MAGA has irreparably damaged these people.
We should have seen this coming, and we didn't. It was hiding in plain sight.MAGA has irreparably damaged these people.
YouTube, Facebook, Twitter....can fck off
They'd be wise to study up on the First Amendment
www.acslaw.org
This is where you demonstrate how fucking retarded you are.You do know that America has had epidemics before like Smallpox, Yellow Fever and Typhoid. Out founding fathers were well aware of them.
The phrase “general welfare” occurs twice in the Constitution. It occurs first in the Preamble, which announces that one of the purposes of the Constitution is to “promote the general Welfare.” Since this is a statement of purpose, not a grant of power, it need not detain us beyond noting that it is there.
This has nothing to do with Trump, but it appears the TDS has irreparable damage you and Mac.
Goddamn, I never thought one man could live in everybody's the way he has. How pathetic of you.
Trump is so far up in your head you cannot think clearly.We should have seen this coming, and we didn't. It was hiding in plain sight.
You do know that America has had epidemics before like Smallpox, Yellow Fever and Typhoid. Out founding fathers were well aware of them.
The phrase “general welfare” occurs twice in the Constitution. It occurs first in the Preamble, which announces that one of the purposes of the Constitution is to “promote the general Welfare.” Since this is a statement of purpose, not a grant of power, it need not detain us beyond noting that it is there.
'To Promote the General Welfare' | ACS
Sep 14, 2011 · The Preamble states that an overriding purpose of the U.S. Constitution is to “promote the general welfare,” indicating that issues such as poverty, housing, food and other economic and social welfare issues facing the citizenry were of central concern to the framers.'To Promote the General Welfare' | ACS
What is the 10th amendment have to do with any of this shit?Try reading the 10th Amendment.
You loons keep this crap up and Jan 6 will look like a cake walk. Rand Paul was 100% correct. I won't comply to government mandates. I didn't before and I won't now.Rand Paul just wants attention.
The general Welfare is in effect a limit on congress.
I've yet to see any of you quislings get it right, yet pretty much all of you pop off about it.
Here's a snip from one of my previous postings on the topic the last time your brood started tossing the phrase around without so much as a hint of a clue as to what they were talking about....
''The mention of the general Welfare in the Preamble was intended to serve as a limit in effect on the use of those delegated powers.
The only other mention of general Welfare is found in Article I, Sec. 8. There, too, the words were meant to serve as a limit in effect. A limit of the power granted under that clause. It does not empower the congress to spend tax money for any and all purpose arbitrarily on a pretense or even a belief that it is for the general welfare, and certainly not to Individuals and localities.
Congress possesses no ''general legislative authority.'' See Federalist #83, by Hamilton of all people, for clarification.
All who ratified the Constitution were in agreement on the limited and limiting meaning of ''general welfare'' in the Taxing Clause.
As Secretary of the Treasury, Hamilton contended for the first time in 1791 ("Opinion as to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States") in favor of a broader interpretation of this clause than he had formerly espoused and broader than that which Madison, with Hamilton's agreement, had presented in 1788 in The Federalist (especially number 41) as reflecting the controlling intent of the Framing Convention, which Madison and Jefferson consistently supported. Hamilton did not claim, however, that this clause gives to the Federal government any power, through taxing-spending, so as in effect to control directly or indirectly anything or anybody, or any activities of the people or of the State governments. Despite his assertion that this clause gives Congress a separate and substantive spending power, Hamilton cautioned expressly (Report on "Manufactures," 1791) that it only authorizes taxing and spending within the limits of what would serve the "general welfare" and does not imply a power to do whatever else should appear to Congress conducive to the "general welfare" that it does "not carry a power to do any other thing not authorized in the Constitution, either expressly or by fair implication."
See also the Supreme Court's 1936 decision ascertaining and defining the original, controlling intent. That would be the 1936 Carter case.
"Congress, entirely apart from those powers delegated by the Constitution, may enact laws to promote the general welfare, have never been accepted but always definitely rejected by this court."
It also decided that the Framing Convention "made no grant of authority to Congress to legislate substantively for the general welfare (citing 1936 Butler case) and no such authority exists, save as the general welfare may be promoted by the exercise of the powers which are granted."
The American people have never amended the Constitution so as to change the limited and limiting meaning of the words "general Welfare" in the Taxing Clause, as originally intended by The Framers and Adopters in 1787-1788.
I'm gonna go ahead and call checkmate ahead of time so the usual suspects know not to waste their time.''
Fascism is here but with symbols that may surprise some:I always thought if fascism ever came to Amera it would be "wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross".
Looking at putrid creatures like Dana and so many others here, it is quite obvious that I was completely wrong.
I always thought if fascism ever came to Amera it would be "wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross".
Looking at putrid creatures like Dana and so many others here, it is quite obvious that I was completely wrong.
In communist china everyone is free to speak the truthI'm glad to see that YouTube has honesty standards and won't compromise that honesty.
People who post such lies should be suspended from websites.
Children are contracting the virus and some are dying.
YouTube suspends Sen. Rand Paul over a video falsely claiming masks are ineffective
The suspension was “a badge of honor," Paul tweeted.www.aol.com
Doctors all over the country also say they do work.Doctors all over the country say masks dont work.
You just want to follow the ones that say what you want to hear. Pre-programmed, if you will
www.ama-assn.org
WHAT libs?Well look to me like it's coming in wrapped in Meanie Memes and BIGLIES to own the libs.
I know.Doctors all over the country also say they do work.
The 6 things doctors wish patients knew about masks
Even though wearing a mask is vital to preventing the spread of COVID-19, there are still myths and misunderstandings. Physicians want to clear them up.
“If two individuals are standing across from each other and neither are wearing pants, if the person across from you urinates, you will get wet,” said Dr. Davuluri. “If you are wearing pants and the person across from you urinates, you will be partially protected. If both individuals are wearing pants, you will be completely protected and remain dry.”
“It’s the same for mask wearing. If neither individual is wearing a mask, you will both be exposed,” she said. “If one person is wearing a mask, you will be partially protected. If both individuals are wearing a mask, both will be protected from being exposed to the virus.”
The bottom line, added Dr. Riddle, is that “masks really do prevent the spread of disease, specifically this virus that we're all fighting. ... They really do save lives—yours and others.”
The AMA is partnering with other leading health organizations to encourage people to mask up to stop the spread of COVID-19.
You want Paul to lose his ability to practice law? He isn't a lawyer, dumbass.If Trump’s lawyers can lose their ability to practice law due to their violations of ethical standards so should Paul.
