The Flood of 1862 PROVES your post is Grade A crapola.Yep, that's what I said, dopey. Now look up at the topic title.. Ohhh!
Your guide to manmade climate disasters in the world today
- Thread starter Tommy Tainant
- Start date
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
Now try explaining how, dopey.
No storm since the 1862 storm comes close in power. Thus, your claims that humans are increasing the power of storms is silly.
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #544
F;ooding in Monmouth as a months rain falls in a day. Much will need to be invested tp protect places that were safe at one time.
The first step will be educating the ignorant about the climate crisis.
The first step will be educating the ignorant about the climate crisis.
What crises? Be specific.
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #546
You know many deniers are making a lot of money out of this. I suspect that you are too thick to get paid anything.
Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #548
Thick as shit. Get someone to read the thread to you.
Get a brain dumbass. I asked you to do one simple thing.
And you can't.
You're just plain old stupid.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,672
- 18,109
- 2,788
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,288
- 14,006
- 2,400
Most of the thread shows that YOU have no viable case to be made as you are up to your neck in climate propaganda that a few here have destroyed utterly yet you continue to be so inept and easily angered for some details to a simple question and your obvious inability to make cogent replies.
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
I made no such claims, dopey liar.
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
Climate Change Indicators: Coastal Flooding | US EPA
This indicator shows how the frequency of coastal flooding has changed over time.
www.epa.gov
Climate Change Indicators: Coastal Flooding | US EPA
This indicator shows how the frequency of coastal flooding has changed over time.
And? Sea level marks all over the world haven't changed in 100 years.Climate Change Indicators: Coastal Flooding | US EPA
This indicator shows how the frequency of coastal flooding has changed over time.
ReinyDays
Platinum Member
Climate Change Indicators: Coastal Flooding | US EPA
This indicator shows how the frequency of coastal flooding has changed over time.
Did you even bother to read this? ... maybe Bubba can't read ... from your link:
"This map shows the average number of days per year in which coastal waters rose above a local threshold for flooding at 42 sites along U.S. coasts. Each small bar graph compares the first decade of widespread measurements (1950–1959 in orange) with the most recent decade (2014–2023 in purple)."
We don't have GPS data from the 1950's ... the GPS data we do have shows ground subsidence all along where there's more locally measured flooding ... see also continental rebound up in Alaska? ...
This is the same problem with centuries of tidal gauge data we have ... continents move, not just back and forth but up and down as well ... without good GPS data on these tidal gauges and these "indicators" in the link, we can't assign any scientific accuracy to the data they provide ...
Sea level will rise less than two feet by Year 2100 according to satellite altimeters {Cite} ... almost all pilings and docks throughout the world are higher than this ... much higher ... only Houston Texas is at risk ...
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
Bullshit. Satellite altimeters have not made tidal gauge data obsolete.
That's your own link saying average sea level rise (not just around Houston) will be more than two feet by 2100. Get a clue or just STFU already.
The North American plate is still undergoing isostatic rebound from the continental ice sheet that once pushed it down into the Earth's crust.
Your silly scientists ignore that.
Why?
ReinyDays
Platinum Member
Read what scientists think about tidal gauge data ... I posted the link ... the authors were crystal clear about why they didn't use that data ... maybe get your reading level up past 4th grade eh? ...
The equation they gave is
rise = 0.042 mm/yr/yr t^2 + 2.9 mm/yr t ... oh wait ... 75 years squared is way to big a number for Bubba ... I'll help, it's 5,625 yr^2 ... square years, ha ha, get it ... the arithmetic is over your head, I get that ... the answer is 550 mm over the next 75 years ... or 22 inches ... when you get to middle school, you'll learn that 22 inches is LESS than 2 feet ...Extra credit if anyone wants to take a shot:
The text of the scientific paper says acceleration is 0.084 mm/yr/yr ... why do we use 0.042 mm/yr/yr in the equation above? ...
ReinyDays
Platinum Member
Continental plates are moving 10 times faster than sea level rise ... 30 mm/yr as an average valve for continental drift ... sea level is closer to 3 mm/yr ... Sydney, Australia, is moving at 70 mm/yr towards the equator ... over twenty times faster than their Opera House being submerged ...
[giggle] ... the diagram in the EPA link clearly shows the effect you speak of ...
Church, White (2006) used tidal gauges ... in the of that paper, they state current rate of rise at 1.9 mm/yr and an acceleration of ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... 0.019 mm/yr/yr ... well short of what I'm stating ... that's only 200 mm or 8 inches of sea level rise by Year 2100 using these tidal gauges ... (don't forget to divide the acceleration value by 2, see above) ...
Typical Hysterical logic ... didn't even check what tidal gauges are reading ... they won't check SB because they're not modeling radiation as photons ... their magic pixie dust doesn't have to follow the Laws of Nature ... it's SUPERNATURAL !!!!!!!! ...
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,672
- 18,109
- 2,788
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
Latest Discussions
-
-
So the FCC chair is threatening networks that broadcast unfavorable news- Latest: Fort Fun Indiana
-
