You Just Lived Through Earth's Hottest Year on Record.

[westwall]

I'm not a scientist.

Neither are you.

But you are a climate change denier.

I am a scientist. You're not.

 

[ding]

Drippy

You should only date men who offer you a moist towel afterwards.

 

[Stryder50]

This isn't about weather control.

In the case of ACC/AGW it's about population and economic control to advance a socialist/communist agenda.

The real factor is that climate determines weather.
Flip side is that the prevalent weather defines the climate.
The two are linked.

 

[Stryder50]

Well, we have to. You screwed it up, and we are going to fix it. Let the adults manage this program.
You children sit in the corner and take notes.

Your type of adult will screw it up far more than it is already.
Especially since it isn't screwed up, but your effort to fix what isn't broken is guaranteed to make things far worse.

I'm fairly certain you barely passed, if at all, your science and math courses when in school.

 

[Stryder50]

Another ridiculous statement.

Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.[1][2]

Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.

Popular or political debate on subjects that are controversial within the public sphere but not necessarily controversial within the scientific community may invoke scientific consensus: note such topics as evolution,[13][14] climate change,[15] the safety of genetically modified organisms,[16] or the lack of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism.[10]

Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Classic Leftist propaganda!

When Galileo advanced the theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun, the scientific consensus was the opposite, that the Sun revolves around the Earth. By your non-logic and irrational statement above, Galileo would have been a science denier.

Galileo was the one of many over the centuries to illustrate that science is data and provable observations, not consensus of opinions.

 

[westwall]

Classic Leftist propaganda!

When Galileo advanced the theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun, the scientific consensus was the opposite, that the Sun revolves around the Earth. By your non-logic and irrational statement above, Galileo would have been a science denier.

Galileo was the one of many over the centuries to illustrate that science is data and provable observations, not consensus of opinions.

Correct. "Consensus" is a political term. Not a scientific one. There is no "consensus" on what the speed of light is. It is measured at 186,282.396 miles per second.

Not calculated, not estimated, not hypothesized.....MEASURED.

 

[Zafira Cherry]

Your type of adult will screw it up far more than it is already.
Especially since it isn't screwed up, but your effort to fix what isn't broken is guaranteed to make things far worse.

I'm fairly certain you barely passed, if at all, your science and math courses when in school.

 

[EMH]

Moron can't disprove the data, because the Jews hid it from you. DURR

EMH has completely disproved the FUDGE over and over, but faux skeptics employed by CO2 FRAUD and Mossad don't like that, because CO2 FRAUD is a JEW FRAUD, and the loyalty of the Mossad is there, not to truth or America.

 

[EMH]

Correct. "Consensus" is a political term. Not a scientific one. There is no "consensus" on what the speed of light is. It is measured at 186,282.396 miles per second.

Not calculated, not estimated, not hypothesized.....MEASURED.

Atmospheric temps were MEASURED and showed NO WARMING.

There is a "consensus" among those ripping off the American taxpayer that the atmospheric data needed to be FUDGED...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[EMH]

In the case of ACC/AGW it's about population and economic control to advance a socialist/communist agenda.

The real factor is that climate determines weather.
Flip side is that the prevalent weather defines the climate.
The two are linked.

Yes they are, all linked to THE AMOUNT OF ICE ON EARTH, which is dictated by HOW MUCH LAND IS NEAR THE POLES.... and LAND MOVES...

 

[Crepitus]

Classic Leftist propaganda!

No, kid. That's an actual fact.

Sorry.

 

[EMH]

No, kid. That's an actual fact.

Sorry.

It is a "fact" that those taxpayer funded fudgebaking liars have a "consensus" that we should keep funding them.


If Pam and Kash get confirmed, there may very well be a "consensus" that not only should all of them be defunded, but should also be convicted of treason, offed, and suffer total asset forfeiture, as should every "leader" who has already covered this truth up in the past...

Google Search

 

[Crepitus]

It is a "fact" that those taxpayer funded fudgebaking liars have a "consensus" that we should keep funding them.


If Pam and Kash get confirmed, there may very well be a "consensus" that not only should all of them be defunded, but should also be convicted of treason, offed, and suffer total asset forfeiture, as should every "leader" who has already covered this truth up in the past...

Google Search

Ah, Global warming isn't real excuse #2 "the scientists are in it for the money".

That's why they all drive Ferraris and live in mansions and shit, right?

 

[ReinyDays]

No, kid. That's an actual fact.

Sorry.

Let's review:

I'm not a scientist.

Thank you for being honest ...

If you're not a scientist ... then what would you know of scientific facts? ... 0.08ºC temperature change doesn't change climate ...

... even if Al Gore says it will ...

 

[ReinyDays]

That's why they all drive Ferraris and live in mansions and shit, right?

That's their football team coach ... Atmospheric Scientists average $50k at NOAA ... about half what a university professor earns, but then you have to teach and that's no fun at all ...

 

[Crepitus]

Let's review:



Thank you for being honest ...

If you're not a scientist ... then what would you know of scientific facts? ... 0.08ºC temperature change doesn't change climate ...

... even if Al Gore says it will ...

YOu are not a scientist either.

 

[Crepitus]

That's their football team coach ... Atmospheric Scientists average $50k at NOAA ... about half what a university professor earns, but then you have to teach and that's no fun at all ...

And the median salary for a US adult is $65K.

Kinda blows that whole theory up, don't it?

 

[ReinyDays]

YOu are not a scientist either.

Never said I was ... only that I know more about science than you ... obviously ...

Have you taken any college-level science class ... one with a lab section ... because it seems you don't even know how to read a scientific instrument, like a thermometer ...

Why on Earth would you think I'm a scientist when I can't even type in simple Englishing? ... sheesh ... the nerve of some people ...

 

[ReinyDays]

And the median salary for a US adult is $65K.

Kinda blows that whole theory up, don't it?

Nope ... not a-tall ... throw Climate Change out the window and funding for climate research would continue unabated ... it's important work long overdue ...

You're not a scientist and obviously have no education in science ... you should be more circumspect on your wild outlandish claims ... otherwise you're no better than EHM ... when you get to high school, they'll teach you where to put the condom ...

 

[Crepitus]

throw Climate Change out the window and funding for climate research would continue unabated ... it's important work long overdue ...

Thank you for making my point.