You don’t like Tulsi Gabbard? This report was prepared not by Gabbard but by a House Intelligence Committee team back in 2017-2018 ...

[TimFitz]

Wrong. While the committee found evidence of Russia trying to interfere with the election, they found no evidence of collusion. From the report: "The committee, however, did not find any evidence of a coordinated scheme between the Trump campaign and Moscow, Rubio said."

This is not accurate.

The Trumpster excuse for Trump’s duplicity has always rested on the legal definition of the word “collusion”, and never on the known facts.

-no one ever denied or could disprove Trump’s near total dependence on Kremlin controlled Russian banks, or the banks Moscow laundered its money through.

-No one ever denied the fact that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort was in debt to Russian oligarch and FSB paymaster, Oleg Deripashka, to whom he supplied Trump campaign information and polling data. This was used to measure the effectiveness of Russian fake news and the flood of Russian bots on social media.

-The Russians hacked the DNC servers and coordinated its use at crucial moments in the campaign. The Trump campaign maintained plausible deniability by separating Roger Stone from the campaign so he could act as a cutout for the Russians. Julian Assange acted for the FSB.

Finally, for those who still cling to the idea that all this well documented and never refuted evidence is a “Russia hoax”, explain this:

What were Russian intelligence officials doing meeting in Trump campaign headquarters with Trump campaign officials including campaign manager Paul Manafort and Don Jr,?

I have asked that specific question of Trump cultists repeatedly over the years. Trumpster run away from that question every single time.

 

[TimFitz]

Context is everything:


"A reporter asked Trump whether he had considered giving a pardon or commutation to Maxwell on Friday.

"It's something I haven't thought about," Trump said as he prepared to depart the White House for Scotland.

"I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," he said."

Donald Trump says he's "allowed" to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell

The convicted Jeffrey Epstein associate met with the Department of Justice to answer fresh questions.

www.newsweek.com

You don’t really expect anyone to believe that, doYou?

There is little doubt that Trump dispatched his lawyer to offer Maxwell a pardon in exchange for either her silence or the lies they want told.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

They're asking if he's going to pardon a sex criminal. He didn't deny it. And you're sucking Trump's cock so hard you think you're eating Trump yogurt.

When this never happens you’ll come back to this forum with a complete retraction and apology right?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Obama was the best president in this century. You racists will lie because you're racists, but historians will see things differently. Comey is not going anywhere, the only people who are in trouble are the people who made this up to protect Trump.

Do you think it was cash for clunkers, inflate your tires or shovel ready jobs that made Obamas presidency so great?

 

[DonGlock26]

You don’t really expect anyone to believe that, doYou?

There is little doubt that Trump dispatched his lawyer to offer Maxwell a pardon in exchange for either her silence or the lies they want told.

How do you have so little doubt? Post your evidence here.

I hope the DOJ releases everything and gets Maxwell to name everyone involved. Let the chips fall where they may.

 

[multivita-man]

When this never happens you’ll come back to this forum with a complete retraction and apology right?

No, I won't because he didn't answer the reporter's question. He may end up not pardoning Maxwell, which would be the wise and right thing to not do. But he could just come out and say that right now instead of leaving us all hanging and wondering whether he will or won't.

Oh, he's just doin that to trigger you libs, and you fell fer it. Joke's on you, you lib-prog scum!

Sure.

Right.

p.s. Release the Epstein files, as MAGA promised.

 

[DonGlock26]

Do you think it was cash for clunkers, inflate your tires or shovel ready jobs that made Obamas presidency so great?

It has to be the billions wasted (money laundered) on failed green energy shell companies and HIllary's conquest of Libya that makes the Obama years so great.

 

[Care4all]

See, this is the fact. A House Intelligence Committee team put this together in 2017-2018, and it was kept hush-hush since.

All Tulsi Gabbard has done is to declassify that report and release it.

​

Fine, you don’t like Tulsi Gabbard. This report was prepared not by Gabbard but by a House Intelligence Committee team back in 2017-2018, working on the grounds of the CIA - which didn’t let the text out of Langley for over seven years. What does that tell you?​

Ahh!

So this is that midnight ride to the Whitehouse Nunes report? Wasn't Cash Patel his aid at the time? And wasn't the House report considered a hack job by Trump sycophants, if memory serves?

 

[Blaster]

Ahh!

So this is that midnight ride to the Whitehouse Nunes report? Wasn't Cash Patel his aid at the time? And wasn't the House report considered a hack job by Trump sycophants, if memory serves?

Why are you still in denial?

 

[TimFitz]

See, this is the fact. A House Intelligence Committee team put this together in 2017-2018, and it was kept hush-hush since.

All Tulsi Gabbard has done is to declassify that report and release it.

​

Fine, you don’t like Tulsi Gabbard. This report was prepared not by Gabbard but by a House Intelligence Committee team back in 2017-2018, working on the grounds of the CIA - which didn’t let the text out of Langley for over seven years. What does that tell you?​

I don’t know where you got this.

In 2017, the House Intelligence Commmittee was chaired by Devin Nunes, one of Trump’s most loyal lickspittles.

He thoroughly politicized the Committee, ignoring bipartisan traditions and and devoting the Committee’s resources to conducting “investigations ” designed to reinforce Trump lies and duplicity.

he leaked like a sieve.

Of course, this new line counts on Trumpsters short and selective memory. What Nunes was doing with the Intelligence committee in 2017 was pure partisan hackery.

Little of it survived public scrutiny. And it was flatly discredited by the Mueller Report and subsequent investigations.

Gabbard’s “Report contains no new information. it is a collection of long known facts arranged suggestively to feed recycled allegations to right wing media.

I have little doubt that these talking points have been sitting on a shelf, waiting in case Trump found himself in need of a smokescreen.

Trumpsters can always be counted on to fall for it.

 

[jknowgood]

Do you think it was cash for clunkers, inflate your tires or shovel ready jobs that made Obamas presidency so great?

Or the world apology tour he started his presidency with.

 

[DonGlock26]

I don’t know where you got this.

In 2017, the House Intelligence Commmittee was chaired by Devin Nunes, one of Trump’s most loyal lickspittles.

He thoroughly politicized the Committee, ignoring bipartisan traditions and and devoting the Committee’s resources to conducting “investigations ” designed to reinforce Trump lies and duplicity.

he leaked like a sieve.

Of course, this new line counts on Trumpsters short and selective memory. What Nunes was doing with the Intelligence committee in 2017 was pure partisan hackery.

Little of it survived public scrutiny. And it was flatly discredited by the Mueller Report and subsequent investigations.

Gabbard’s “Report contains no new information. it is a collection of long known facts arranged suggestively to feed recycled allegations to right wing media.

I have little doubt that these talking points have been sitting on a shelf, waiting in case Trump found himself in need of a smokescreen.

Trumpsters can always be counted on to fall for it.

We'll see what the grand juries uncover with their subpoena powers and taking testimony under oath.

 

[Delldude]

And the follow up 2020 Senate report that put it all on the Russians and the Trump campaign?

The best she can hope for now in her criminality is a pardon.

Only problem is that investigation was solely based on the corrupt, manufactured Intel.

 

[TimFitz]

Ahh!

So this is that midnight ride to the Whitehouse Nunes report? Wasn't Cash Patel his aid at the time? And wasn't the House report considered a hack job by Trump sycophants, if memory serves?

Yes, this was the product of Devin Nunes’ midnight run to the White House. And Trash Patel was the principal architect of the “Nunes memo”.

It was discredited a long time ago. So much so, that it destroyed the credibility of the Intelligence Committee under Nunes, shattering its longstanding bipartisan tradition.

Nunes is still a Trump lickspittle, resigning to run Truth Social and presiding over its losses and involved in malfeasance.

now, he chairs the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board. This would be laughably ironic we’re it not so flagrantly corrupt.

 

[TimFitz]

Only problem is that investigation was solely based on the corrupt, manufactured Intel.

This is false.

But it does describe the Nunes memo. Which was political theater.

 

[TimFitz]

We'll see what the grand juries uncover with their subpoena powers and taking testimony under oath.

There won’t be any grand juries.

 

[TimFitz]

Which of the hundreds were initiated by the Trump campaign for the purposes of collusion?

Show me, your words mean less than nothing.

The question is irrelevant.

Had the Russian made contact, the Trump Campaign’s duty was to refuse to get involved with any attempt by a foreign government to use its resources to affect the results of an election in the United States.

Trump embraced the Russians, and continued to do so for years.

Trump had been actively courting Putin for years, with little success.

he had his operatives in Moscow in 2015, under the cover of trying to get permits to develop a Trump Tower Moscow. Trump even offered Putin a $75 million bribe to bless the project.

Carter Page was one of them.

 

[Delldude]

This is false.

Then prove me wrong.

But it does describe the Nunes memo

Nunes was spot on.

 

[TimFitz]

Then prove me wrong.


Nunes was spot on.

I don’t have to spend any time on that.

The 2020 report has not been challenged. The facts noted therein had already been thoroughly documented.

Dispite the meaningless noise from right trash media, no part of the report was ever refuted or discredited.

The events described actually happened and are very well documented.

As is the contents of the Mueller Report.

Nunes’ hit piece fell apart right away.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The events described actually happened and are very well documented.

As is the contents of the Mueller Report.

LoL!

If the contents of the Meuller Report were so well-documented, why did Meuller not read it at least before he defended it in Congress?