You DemocraPS keep saying the Rep are the party for the rich .. Hate to break it to

[Lovebears65]

too you but the Democraps are more wealthy better start hating on them now

Heritage Foundation Study Finds Democrats Represent More Wealthy Districts Than Republicans | Fox News

 

[uscitizen]

too you but the Democraps are more wealthy better start hating on them now

Heritage Foundation Study Finds Democrats Represent More Wealthy Districts Than Republicans | Fox News

Wealthy districts yes becuase dems pretty much carry the large cities.
Repubs carry the more rural areas where the rich are spread out more.

 

[Plasmaball]

oh good a stupid thread.

 

[salem.hills]

I find it baffling the democraps idolize the 1% but want us in a war against prosperity. Its totally schizo? Repubs give to charity, democraps talk about how spending other peoples money, we don't have now or can sustain now. Put the kids in debt they care so much lol.

 

[buckeye45_73]

ALOT of rich people are liberal. Usually the kids that havent done anything and feel guilty. Hillary Clinton is a good example, she went to Wellsley, Smith or Radcliffe, one of the feminist colleges a republican and came out a nutjob.

 

[occupied]

It must be opposite day on the Micky Mouse Club.

 

[Middleoftheroad]

ALOT of rich people are liberal. Usually the kids that havent done anything and feel guilty. Hillary Clinton is a good example, she went to Wellsley, Smith or Radcliffe, one of the feminist colleges a republican and came out a nutjob.

Her, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Elon Musk, and the late Steve Jobs.

Rich people want the government to tax them more.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Occupied says there are no rich democrats, he must bein fairy land with his unicorn. What a lemming.

 

[sealybobo]

too you but the Democraps are more wealthy better start hating on them now

Heritage Foundation Study Finds Democrats Represent More Wealthy Districts Than Republicans | Fox News

This should put this argument to rest.

Wagner Act | Summary, History, & Facts

Wagner Act, the most important piece of labor legislation enacted in the United States in the 20th century. Its main purpose was to establish the legal right of most workers (notably excepting agricultural and domestic workers) to organize or join labor unions and to bargain collectively with...

www.britannica.com

Wagner Act, the most important piece of labour legislation enacted in the United States in the 20th century. Its main purpose was to establish the legal right of most workers (notably excepting agricultural and domestic workers) to organize or join labour unions and to bargain collectively with their employers.

Forget about which party was for it back then. Which party would be for it and which party would be against it today? You can't say that Republicans would side with labor. They wouldn't. That would be a lie.

Right to work is what the party of the rich want.

In the context of labor law in the United States, the term right-to-work laws refers to state laws that prohibit union security agreements between employers and labor unions. Such agreements can be incorporated into union contracts to require employees who are not union members to contribute to the costs of union representation. Unlike the right to work definition as a human right in international law, U.S. right-to-work laws do not aim to provide a general guarantee of employment to people seeking work but rather guarantee an employee's right to refrain from being a member of a labor union.

Who wants labor to have a seat at the table? Democrats do. Wake up America.