You can't codify Roe into a federal law. But this is what Dems can do instead.

[Stormy Daniels]

Despite the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe, there's a feasible legislative path forward to entrench women's right to choose, without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution. It won't happen overnight, but the objective Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws that otherwise would prohibit abortion or would attempt to thwart women's access to abortion services.

First, amend HIPAA to create a confidential on behalf of healthcare professionals providing abortion related services, just the same as a patient otherwise enjoys. This way, no patient who receives an abortion can be legally compelled, or even permitted, to testify against an abortion provider. No healthcare provider can be compelled, or even permitted, to testify against a colleague for providing abortion services.

Amend the ACA to mandate interstate coverage for women's reproductive health services. Also create a federal extension for licensed healthcare providers, so that anyone licensed in a state to provide healthcare services is granted federal authority to engage in equivalent healthcare based commerce to patients across state lines.

Employ the full faith and credit clause to ensure that no state can extend the effects of any anti-choice law, lawsuit outcome, or attempt to collect evidence or information against a healthcare provider or patient, beyond their own borders.

Require medical billing coding changes to women's reproductive related healthcare services so that healthcare providers can bill insurance providers using generic terms like "reproductive related procedure" without the need to provide more specific, potentially incriminating, details.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

I don't believe confidentiality applies when there is a murder involved...

 

[j-mac]

Despite the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe, there's a feasible legislative path forward to entrench women's right to choose, without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution. It won't happen overnight, but the objective Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws that otherwise would prohibit abortion or would attempt to thwart women's access to abortion services.

First, amend HIPAA to create a confidential on behalf of healthcare professionals providing abortion related services, just the same as a patient otherwise enjoys. This way, no patient who receives an abortion can be legally compelled, or even permitted, to testify against an abortion provider. No healthcare provider can be compelled, or even permitted, to testify against a colleague for providing abortion services.

Amend the ACA to mandate interstate coverage for women's reproductive health services. Also create a federal extension for licensed healthcare providers, so that anyone licensed in a state to provide healthcare services is granted federal authority to engage in equivalent healthcare based commerce to patients across state lines.

Employ the full faith and credit clause to ensure that no state can extend the effects of any anti-choice law, lawsuit outcome, or attempt to collect evidence or information against a healthcare provider or patient, beyond their own borders.

Require medical billing coding changes to women's reproductive related healthcare services so that healthcare providers can bill insurance providers using generic terms like "reproductive related procedure" without the need to provide more specific, potentially incriminating, details.

In the bold, you admit that it is a futile attempt to pass an amendment...But that is how you enshrine a "right".... So, let's look at the process to pass an amendment....

"The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures."

Constitutional Amendment Process

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for...

www.archives.gov

So, by your own admission you don't have the majority you think you have, and why do you think that is? Well, it's because you idiots can't do anything without going way overboard....My opinion is that if you came up with something that was reasonable you would have a chance, but you want to kill babies right up to the moment before birth....America doesn't agree with that.

So, once again, you call for subverting the process to make it a right, in favor of forcing it on the general public as a whole and calling it a right. Lazy fools.

 

[Oddball]

"We can't sway people with superior reasoning and persuasion, so we'll just hijack and abuse the trappings of the leviathan administrative state in order to get what we want, despite the law of the land."

And these liberoidals wonder why they get called fascists.

 

[pknopp]

If something is illegal and there is sufficient proof of that, a court can grant a search warrant. That's going to be the problem with enforcing abortion laws though. How does this sufficient proof get presented?

" we saw women going into a clinic"? What's to stop a doctor from classifying an abortion as a miscarriage? Are we really going to drag every woman that has a miscarriage before the courts and pummel her with questions?

How many that are pro-life and have had a wife or partner miscarry would support that?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Despite the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe, there's a feasible legislative path forward to entrench women's right to choose, without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution. It won't happen overnight, but the objective Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws that otherwise would prohibit abortion or would attempt to thwart women's access to abortion services.

First, amend HIPAA to create a confidential on behalf of healthcare professionals providing abortion related services, just the same as a patient otherwise enjoys. This way, no patient who receives an abortion can be legally compelled, or even permitted, to testify against an abortion provider. No healthcare provider can be compelled, or even permitted, to testify against a colleague for providing abortion services.

Amend the ACA to mandate interstate coverage for women's reproductive health services. Also create a federal extension for licensed healthcare providers, so that anyone licensed in a state to provide healthcare services is granted federal authority to engage in equivalent healthcare based commerce to patients across state lines.

Employ the full faith and credit clause to ensure that no state can extend the effects of any anti-choice law, lawsuit outcome, or attempt to collect evidence or information against a healthcare provider or patient, beyond their own borders.

Require medical billing coding changes to women's reproductive related healthcare services so that healthcare providers can bill insurance providers using generic terms like "reproductive related procedure" without the need to provide more specific, potentially incriminating, details.

Can't codify murdering a human life.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

If something is illegal and there is sufficient proof of that, a court can grant a search warrant. That's going to be the problem with enforcing abortion laws though. How does this sufficient proof get presented?

" we saw women going into a clinic"? What's to stop a doctor from classifying an abortion as a miscarriage? Are we really going to drag every woman that has a miscarriage before the courts and pummel her with questions?

How many that are pro-life and have had a wife or partner miscarry would support that?

Not only would they be killing a human life. They would be lying about it. Sounds familiar with most murder cases. "It wasn't me".

 

[BrokeLoser]

Despite the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe, there's a feasible legislative path forward to entrench women's right to choose, without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution. It won't happen overnight, but the objective Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws that otherwise would prohibit abortion or would attempt to thwart women's access to abortion services.

First, amend HIPAA to create a confidential on behalf of healthcare professionals providing abortion related services, just the same as a patient otherwise enjoys. This way, no patient who receives an abortion can be legally compelled, or even permitted, to testify against an abortion provider. No healthcare provider can be compelled, or even permitted, to testify against a colleague for providing abortion services.

Amend the ACA to mandate interstate coverage for women's reproductive health services. Also create a federal extension for licensed healthcare providers, so that anyone licensed in a state to provide healthcare services is granted federal authority to engage in equivalent healthcare based commerce to patients across state lines.

Employ the full faith and credit clause to ensure that no state can extend the effects of any anti-choice law, lawsuit outcome, or attempt to collect evidence or information against a healthcare provider or patient, beyond their own borders.

Require medical billing coding changes to women's reproductive related healthcare services so that healthcare providers can bill insurance providers using generic terms like "reproductive related procedure" without the need to provide more specific, potentially incriminating, details.

If something is illegal and there is sufficient proof of that, a court can grant a search warrant. That's going to be the problem with enforcing abortion laws though. How does this sufficient proof get presented?

" we saw women going into a clinic"? What's to stop a doctor from classifying an abortion as a miscarriage? Are we really going to drag every woman that has a miscarriage before the courts and pummel her with questions?

How many that are pro-life and have had a wife or partner miscarry would support that?

The left…in their pussy hats carry on with their shameless antics…they can’t help themselves.
”Dark Democrats are ignorant as fuck…we can’t expect them to have responsible sex like all good, smart decent people do, we must create loopholes for these ignorant as fuck degenerates.”

What’s perplexing is that you whackos don’t even realize that’s exactly what you’re saying without saying exactly that.
Do your dark pet humans know you think so low of them?

 

[pknopp]

The left…

'
Just address what I state and leave your boogeymen under your bed.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

In the bold, you admit that it is a futile attempt to pass an amendment...But that is how you enshrine a "right".... So, let's look at the process to pass an amendment....

Just like a typical right winger. You think that rights only exist because the state says so.

 

[toobfreak]

Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws

THAT'S IT! Bravo. Respond to federal overreaching by having the fed interfer with states operating their own laws! Yeah, sure, way to run a country! Way to lose more votes for the midterms!!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Despite the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe, there's a feasible legislative path forward to entrench women's right to choose, without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution. It won't happen overnight, but the objective Democrats should undertake is to make it impossible to enforce state laws that otherwise would prohibit abortion or would attempt to thwart women's access to abortion services.

First, amend HIPAA to create a confidential on behalf of healthcare professionals providing abortion related services, just the same as a patient otherwise enjoys. This way, no patient who receives an abortion can be legally compelled, or even permitted, to testify against an abortion provider. No healthcare provider can be compelled, or even permitted, to testify against a colleague for providing abortion services.

Amend the ACA to mandate interstate coverage for women's reproductive health services. Also create a federal extension for licensed healthcare providers, so that anyone licensed in a state to provide healthcare services is granted federal authority to engage in equivalent healthcare based commerce to patients across state lines.

Employ the full faith and credit clause to ensure that no state can extend the effects of any anti-choice law, lawsuit outcome, or attempt to collect evidence or information against a healthcare provider or patient, beyond their own borders.

Require medical billing coding changes to women's reproductive related healthcare services so that healthcare providers can bill insurance providers using generic terms like "reproductive related procedure" without the need to provide more specific, potentially incriminating, details.

HIPPA does not apply to criminal acts.... Sorry... this too is a no go..

 

[Polishprince]

I don't think you can force insurance companies to pay for Illegal Services regardless of what bullshit you try to enact.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

In the bold, you admit that it is a futile attempt to pass an amendment...But that is how you enshrine a "right".... So, let's look at the process to pass an amendment....

"The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures."

Constitutional Amendment Process

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for...

www.archives.gov

So, by your own admission you don't have the majority you think you have, and why do you think that is? Well, it's because you idiots can't do anything without going way overboard....My opinion is that if you came up with something that was reasonable you would have a chance, but you want to kill babies right up to the moment before birth....America doesn't agree with that.

So, once again, you call for subverting the process to make it a right, in favor of forcing it on the general public as a whole and calling it a right. Lazy fools.

It's what their lazy asses always do. See the 2A.

 

[j-mac]

THAT'S IT! Bravo. Respond to federal overreaching by having the fed interfer with states operating their own laws! Yeah, sure, way to run a country! Way to lose more votes for the midterms!!!

No, rights are inherent, given by God. Now, rights in a republic like ours are enshrined in the Constitution…

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Just like a typical right winger. You think that rights only exist because the state says so.

Typical commies think that rights do not exist EVEN WHEN ENUMERATED (see 2A)

 

[Stormy Daniels]

THAT'S IT! Bravo. Respond to federal overreaching by having the fed interfer with states operating their own laws! Yeah, sure, way to run a country! Way to lose more votes for the midterms!!!

That's what the slave owners said.

 

[Votto]

I don't believe confidentiality applies when there is a murder involved...

Tell the Clintons that.

There appears to already be a precedent there, sorry.

 

[whitehall]

The Court finally ended the "eugenic" system that unfairly targeted black women and elitist democrats hate it. It's ironic that people who call themselves democrats are afraid of democracy.

 

[fncceo]

without having to make a futile attempt to amend the constitution.

Why would it be futile to attempt to amend The Constitution if, as you claim, voters in every state are overwhelmingly in favor or unlimited abortion on demand?