You Cannot Investigate a Candidate Running For President?

[JusticeHammer]

The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage - that there is no other, independent reason. This begs two equally poignant questions: (1) Why isn't the Biden fact pattern sufficient to justify an inquiry by Ukrainian authorities, and (2) by what logic does one conclude that the mere announcement of an investigation is advantageous to the Trump campaign?

On the second point, if Biden turns out to be the nominee, is there any doubt whatsoever that Trump will fill the airwaves with the particulars of the Bidens' enrichment, positions, conflicts, etc.? By that time (August 2020) who will give a shit about a pathetic, meaningless announcement a year earlier by a foreign leader whose name fewer than ten Americans know? The idea that this announcement constitutes "foreign interference with the American Presidential Election!" is absolutely preposterous. As with the Russian campaign in 2016, one would be hard pressed in 2021 to find a single American voter who even remembers these matters, let alone based their vote on it.

To say that the Democrats' case is flimsier than rice paper does a disservice to rice paper.

What other Americans did your blob want investigated but the Ukrainian authorities in the phone call?

Even that "blob" is smarter than you idiots.

 

[Faun]

I have a question for Lefty Commies here.

If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President, then why did Obama buy Russian Propaganda and launch an Investigation based on it, on Candidate Trump when he knew it was a lie and knew it was Russian Propaganda?

Full Article at the below link

Obama spied on an opponent and the FBI lied repeatedly. Trump is being impeached?

We are frogs in boiling water.

When President Trump first blew the whistle — in a now-famous 2017 tweet that misspelled the word “tapp” — on the previous administration’s spying operation against his presidential campaign at the height of the election, Swamp creatures laughed. They ridiculed. They mocked.

It was a lie, they said. Never happened.

And the gaslight media backed them up. They whitewashed the whole thing for their friends in the Obama administration. And for their friends in the federal administrative state.

Today, after enduring two years of spinning, counter-leaks and relentless lies, we know officially what any sensible person knew from the beginning.

The FBI never alerted the Trump campaign to this grave inside threat, obviously, because the Department of Justice believed that the Trump campaign — including Mr. Trump, himself — was in on the giant con.

And therein lies the plotted coup.

Whatever you think of former President Barack Obama or Mr. Trump or Carter Page or James B. Comey or anybody’s foreign policy opinion regarding Russia or NATO or Mexico, only one thing matters in this situation. At the moment these decisions were being made to spy on the Trump campaign, Mr. Obama was president. His administration was at the controls of one of the most sprawling and sophisticated espionage apparatuses ever assembled on this planet.

At that time, Mr. Trump was an avowed political opponent. Any decision made by the Obama administration to spy on officials inside the Trump campaign was of massive, profound constitutional import. It is in these moments where a country is either a nation of laws or a banana republic.

It is either “equal justice under law” or a police state.

So, FBI agents — operating at the highest levels of DOJ authority — sought secret warrant applications normally reserved for our worst enemies such as active terrorists plotting to kill as many innocent Americans as possible.

Me:

And Obama Gave The Order To
investigate Candidate Trump while he was The Republican Nominee for President, not before that, only after he became The Nominee!

"If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President"

Literally no one is arguing that, Stumpy. As always, you prove to be too insane to know what's going on around you.

 

[Faun]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

The Democrat Party is saying that very thing.

LOLOL

No they're not, Stumpy.

 

[Faun]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

That's nice. So then you won't have a problem if we get to the bottom of Biden's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

Go right ahead -- just do it legally.

 

[Faun]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

Just Embarrassing.
I’m Embarrassed For You

View attachment 303340

Coyote again embarrasses herself and makes you wonder, is she kidding? Or are all leftists that bass-ackwards delusional? They are impeaching Donald just for that, and the great lie that he inquired with Ukraine to effect harm to Biden, the truth is that:

1. Giuliani began the investigation in January 2019.
2. He released the info around March, which including info on both Joe's connections AND Hunter's ties to Burisma.
3. It was about a month later that Uncle Joe announced his running.

And the Democrats have been squawking ever since: FOUL! FOUL! You cannot investigate a political opponent! You are trying to influence the election! It is as if they ran Joe to try to protect the Ukrainian connection under an umbrella of "election tampering."

View attachment 303340 I have ZERO respect for this nation's political process anymore. It has ZERO integrity. I really wonder if our vote counts at all and that what they are MOST upset at is the fact that they were SO SURE Trump would never get in, they let him slip right under their radar!! Aside from the fact that such actions go all the way back to Lincoln at least, who let soldiers go back to vote for his benefit as others died in combat depleted their numbers, but that we let this lie get perpetrated over and over even as we all know that:

• OBAMA DID IT.
• HILLARY DID IT.
• THE DNC DID IT.
• AND THE DNC IS STILL TRYING TO DO IT.

And our media stands by a willing player in the farce. And I won't even mention illegal votes, voter fraud, voter intimidation, even after Barry Big-Ears told us that our elections were IMMUNE to tampering and outside influence just a few years ago.

View attachment 303340

"They are impeaching Donald just for that"

LOLOL

No, they're not, ya dumbfuck.

They impeached him for soliciting a foreign national to investigate Biden. Had Impeached Trump engaged his own DoJ to legally investigate Biden, Impeached Trump wouldn't have been impeached.

Like I always say, there is no creature slithering this planet dumber than a conservative.

 

[Faun]

The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage - that there is no other, independent reason. This begs two equally poignant questions: (1) Why isn't the Biden fact pattern sufficient to justify an inquiry by Ukrainian authorities, and (2) by what logic does one conclude that the mere announcement of an investigation is advantageous to the Trump campaign?

On the second point, if Biden turns out to be the nominee, is there any doubt whatsoever that Trump will fill the airwaves with the particulars of the Bidens' enrichment, positions, conflicts, etc.? By that time (August 2020) who will give a shit about a pathetic, meaningless announcement a year earlier by a foreign leader whose name fewer than ten Americans know? The idea that this announcement constitutes "foreign interference with the American Presidential Election!" is absolutely preposterous. As with the Russian campaign in 2016, one would be hard pressed in 2021 to find a single American voter who even remembers these matters, let alone based their vote on it.

To say that the Democrats' case is flimsier than rice paper does a disservice to rice paper.

"The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage"

Actually, that's Impeached Trump's defense. His attorney actually argued that soliciting a foreign national to help Impeach Trump get re-elected is not an impeachable offense because Impeached Trump believes him getting re-elected is in the best interest of the nation.

Meaning Impeached Trump should be legally allowed to shoot Joe Biden on 5th Avenue because it increases his chance at being re-elected and he believes that is in the best interest of the country.

 

[Coyote]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

Just Embarrassing.
I’m Embarrassed For You

View attachment 303340

Coyote again embarrasses herself and makes you wonder, is she kidding? Or are all leftists that bass-ackwards delusional? They are impeaching Donald just for that, and the great lie that he inquired with Ukraine to effect harm to Biden, the truth is that:

1. Giuliani began the investigation in January 2019.
2. He released the info around March, which including info on both Joe's connections AND Hunter's ties to Burisma.
3. It was about a month later that Uncle Joe announced his running.

And the Democrats have been squawking ever since: FOUL! FOUL! You cannot investigate a political opponent! You are trying to influence the election! It is as if they ran Joe to try to protect the Ukrainian connection under an umbrella of "election tampering."

View attachment 303340 I have ZERO respect for this nation's political process anymore. It has ZERO integrity. I really wonder if our vote counts at all and that what they are MOST upset at is the fact that they were SO SURE Trump would never get in, they let him slip right under their radar!! Aside from the fact that such actions go all the way back to Lincoln at least, who let soldiers go back to vote for his benefit as others died in combat depleted their numbers, but that we let this lie get perpetrated over and over even as we all know that:

• OBAMA DID IT.
• HILLARY DID IT.
• THE DNC DID IT.
• AND THE DNC IS STILL TRYING TO DO IT.

And our media stands by a willing player in the farce. And I won't even mention illegal votes, voter fraud, voter intimidation, even after Barry Big-Ears told us that our elections were IMMUNE to tampering and outside influence just a few years ago.

View attachment 303340

They are not saying you can’t investigate some who is running for president.

...but you are either so mind washed by your cult you can’t see it, or you are deliberately pretending you can’t understand this.

The issue is whether or not it is ok to misuse foreign aid to force a foreign country to anounce an investigation into a personal political rival for personal political gain.

Your inability to understand even basic ethical concepts like this is beyond embarrassing, it is downright pathetic, but cults will do that to you.

I realize this might be too complex for you handle, fortunately most of the American people do actually get this.

Now go back to your cult’s mantra...
OBAMA
HILARY
DEEP STATE
DNC

 

[Coyote]

The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage - that there is no other, independent reason. This begs two equally poignant questions: (1) Why isn't the Biden fact pattern sufficient to justify an inquiry by Ukrainian authorities, and (2) by what logic does one conclude that the mere announcement of an investigation is advantageous to the Trump campaign?

On the second point, if Biden turns out to be the nominee, is there any doubt whatsoever that Trump will fill the airwaves with the particulars of the Bidens' enrichment, positions, conflicts, etc.? By that time (August 2020) who will give a shit about a pathetic, meaningless announcement a year earlier by a foreign leader whose name fewer than ten Americans know? The idea that this announcement constitutes "foreign interference with the American Presidential Election!" is absolutely preposterous. As with the Russian campaign in 2016, one would be hard pressed in 2021 to find a single American voter who even remembers these matters, let alone based their vote on it.

To say that the Democrats' case is flimsier than rice paper does a disservice to rice paper.

"The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage"

Actually, that's Impeached Trump's defense. His attorney actually argued that soliciting a foreign national to help Impeach Trump get re-elected is not an impeachable offense because Impeached Trump believes him getting re-elected is in the best interest of the nation.

Meaning Impeached Trump should be legally allowed to shoot Joe Biden on 5th Avenue because it increases his chance at being re-elected and he believes that is in the best interest of the country.

Here is what is really goofy: they weren’t even asking for an real investigation, they just wanted Ukraine to publicly announce it and even wrote up what they should say.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage - that there is no other, independent reason. This begs two equally poignant questions: (1) Why isn't the Biden fact pattern sufficient to justify an inquiry by Ukrainian authorities, and (2) by what logic does one conclude that the mere announcement of an investigation is advantageous to the Trump campaign?

On the second point, if Biden turns out to be the nominee, is there any doubt whatsoever that Trump will fill the airwaves with the particulars of the Bidens' enrichment, positions, conflicts, etc.? By that time (August 2020) who will give a shit about a pathetic, meaningless announcement a year earlier by a foreign leader whose name fewer than ten Americans know? The idea that this announcement constitutes "foreign interference with the American Presidential Election!" is absolutely preposterous. As with the Russian campaign in 2016, one would be hard pressed in 2021 to find a single American voter who even remembers these matters, let alone based their vote on it.

To say that the Democrats' case is flimsier than rice paper does a disservice to rice paper.

Why doesn’t this supposed fact pattern initiate an investigation by Trump’s DoJ?

 

[bullwinkle]

If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President,
Mr Tree, I believe your assumption is wrong, in this way: Yes! you can and should investigate corruption in any and all candidates...by the US investigating agencies! Mr. Trump is asking a formerly chastised corrupt foreign group to do the job because he can influence their conclusions thru extortion. Of course you will counter with the Steele Dossier, but that was never a key factor in the '16 campaign because it didn't check out.


""then why did Obama (Obama?) buy Russian Propaganda and launch an Investigation based on it, on Candidate Trump when he knew it was a lie and knew it was Russian Propaganda?

""

What proof, other that the word of the world's most famous liar and diversionist, do you have the Obama bought Russian propaganda and launched an investigation on it and Trump...whom he warned about Russian interference?

 

[toobfreak]

They are not saying you can’t investigate some who is running for president.

The issue is whether or not it is ok to misuse foreign aid to force a foreign country to anounce an investigation into a personal political rival for personal political gain.

A subtle difference without a distinction.

Well obviously the Democrats are saying THEY can investigate someone running for president! THEY'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR FOUR YEARS! And they try to impeach most every GOP president at some point.

But let a Republican do it for well-grounded reasons, they throw up a red alarm, claiming misuse of foreign aid despite misusing no foreign aid, announcing an investigation despite that no investigation was ever announced, into a political rival despite the fact that Joe wasn't even running yet when all this started, and for political gain despite the fact that no "gain" has been shown nor demonstrated!

Considering that a president IS his foreign policy by every rule in the Constitution, the democrats lack any "victim" here, and the fact that they announced their intention to impeach Trump THREE YEARS AGO then went through their bogus hearings before Christmas with end goal announced in advance conducted so as to fit their holiday timetable, we all know this is total BULLSHIT.

Trump just had requests for 112,000 tickets for a rally in a blue state.

CAN YOU READ THE WRITING ON THE WALL?

Trump is acquitted and goes on to win 2020 this fall in an even bigger landslide slobber-knocker to the dismay of tards everywhere, then kicks it up a notch and gets right back to business in busting progressive heinie everywhere.

So good. So good.

 

[The Original Tree]

If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President,
Mr Tree, I believe your assumption is wrong, in this way: Yes! you can and should investigate corruption in any and all candidates...by the US investigating agencies! Mr. Trump is asking a formerly chastised corrupt foreign group to do the job because he can influence their conclusions thru extortion. Of course you will counter with the Steele Dossier, but that was never a key factor in the '16 campaign because it didn't check out.


""then why did Obama (Obama?) buy Russian Propaganda and launch an Investigation based on it, on Candidate Trump when he knew it was a lie and knew it was Russian Propaganda?

""

What proof, other that the word of the world's most famous liar and diversionist, do you have the Obama bought Russian propaganda and launched an investigation on it and Trump...whom he warned about Russian interference?

Funny to see a Liar try to call me, a person who has done nothing but champion truth a LIAR, because you don't like what I have to say. Hope you have time to read, Liar...

Brennan Lied About Not Including Steele Dossier In IC Assessment On 2016 Russian Election Interference

Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Tom Fitton: Obama State Department Was "All Hands On Deck" For Targeting Trump With Steele Dossier

Ukrainian Embassy confirms DNC contractor solicited Trump dirt in 2016

Who is Alexandra Chalupa? The DNC operative Republicans say dug for dirt on Trump

Opinion | Hillary Clinton and Ukraine

Groups claim Clinton campaign broke campaign laws over Fusion GPS and Steele funding

Memo: FBI Used Tainted Steele Dossier, Paid For By Hillary Clinton, As Reason To Spy On Trump | Investor's Business Daily

Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier

FBI releases documents showing payments to Trump dossier author Steele

Clinton campaign broke election laws with dossier author payment, lawsuit claims

 

[The Original Tree]

I have a question for Lefty Commies here.

If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President, then why did Obama buy Russian Propaganda and launch an Investigation based on it, on Candidate Trump when he knew it was a lie and knew it was Russian Propaganda?

Full Article at the below link

Obama spied on an opponent and the FBI lied repeatedly. Trump is being impeached?

We are frogs in boiling water.

When President Trump first blew the whistle — in a now-famous 2017 tweet that misspelled the word “tapp” — on the previous administration’s spying operation against his presidential campaign at the height of the election, Swamp creatures laughed. They ridiculed. They mocked.

It was a lie, they said. Never happened.

And the gaslight media backed them up. They whitewashed the whole thing for their friends in the Obama administration. And for their friends in the federal administrative state.

Today, after enduring two years of spinning, counter-leaks and relentless lies, we know officially what any sensible person knew from the beginning.

The FBI never alerted the Trump campaign to this grave inside threat, obviously, because the Department of Justice believed that the Trump campaign — including Mr. Trump, himself — was in on the giant con.

And therein lies the plotted coup.

Whatever you think of former President Barack Obama or Mr. Trump or Carter Page or James B. Comey or anybody’s foreign policy opinion regarding Russia or NATO or Mexico, only one thing matters in this situation. At the moment these decisions were being made to spy on the Trump campaign, Mr. Obama was president. His administration was at the controls of one of the most sprawling and sophisticated espionage apparatuses ever assembled on this planet.

At that time, Mr. Trump was an avowed political opponent. Any decision made by the Obama administration to spy on officials inside the Trump campaign was of massive, profound constitutional import. It is in these moments where a country is either a nation of laws or a banana republic.

It is either “equal justice under law” or a police state.

So, FBI agents — operating at the highest levels of DOJ authority — sought secret warrant applications normally reserved for our worst enemies such as active terrorists plotting to kill as many innocent Americans as possible.

Me:

And Obama Gave The Order To
investigate Candidate Trump while he was The Republican Nominee for President, not before that, only after he became The Nominee!

"If your whole impeachment argument is that you cannot investigate a person running for President"

Literally no one is arguing that, Stumpy. As always, you prove to be too insane to know what's going on around you.

I take it you don't watch the news, nor have you been watching Shampeachment.

 

[The Original Tree]

Righ

The Democrat narrative is that the only conceivable reason to announce an investigation of the Bidens is for Trump's political advantage - that there is no other, independent reason. This begs two equally poignant questions: (1) Why isn't the Biden fact pattern sufficient to justify an inquiry by Ukrainian authorities, and (2) by what logic does one conclude that the mere announcement of an investigation is advantageous to the Trump campaign?

On the second point, if Biden turns out to be the nominee, is there any doubt whatsoever that Trump will fill the airwaves with the particulars of the Bidens' enrichment, positions, conflicts, etc.? By that time (August 2020) who will give a shit about a pathetic, meaningless announcement a year earlier by a foreign leader whose name fewer than ten Americans know? The idea that this announcement constitutes "foreign interference with the American Presidential Election!" is absolutely preposterous. As with the Russian campaign in 2016, one would be hard pressed in 2021 to find a single American voter who even remembers these matters, let alone based their vote on it.

To say that the Democrats' case is flimsier than rice paper does a disservice to rice paper.

Why doesn’t this supposed fact pattern initiate an investigation by Trump’s DoJ?

Right now due to the investigation in to the Russian Hoax Operation Crossfire Hurricane, and Insurance Policy COUP, 30 FBI and DOJ officials have been fired, forced to resign, demoted and had their security clearances stripped, and over 100 Clinton-Obama Associates are under Criminal Investigation.

And then you have Adam Schiff and Nadler falling on their swords to protect Clinton, Biden and Obama, just like James Comey ran himself through doing the same.


Nunes: Two Dozen People Inside FBI And DOJ Face Criminal Referral Over Origin Of Trump-Russia Investigation

Justice Dept. Is Said to Open Criminal Inquiry Into Its Own Russia Investigation

 

[The Original Tree]

I am proud to have drawn in to this thread, the enemies of The United States, and Allies of Leftist DNC Disinformation Cabal, and the chief Deep State Propagandists on USMB in to this thread.

The Democrat Party is owned by Foreign Interests, and Wealthy Lobbies, The UN and Globalists, and their biggest concern is to tear America and Donald Trump down so that they won't be cut off from their drugs and their Brown Latino Slaves to work their plantations and in their sweat shops.

 

[Faun]

They are not saying you can’t investigate some who is running for president.

The issue is whether or not it is ok to misuse foreign aid to force a foreign country to anounce an investigation into a personal political rival for personal political gain.

A subtle difference without a distinction.

Well obviously the Democrats are saying THEY can investigate someone running for president! THEY'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR FOUR YEARS! And they try to impeach most every GOP president at some point.

But let a Republican do it for well-grounded reasons, they throw up a red alarm, claiming misuse of foreign aid despite misusing no foreign aid, announcing an investigation despite that no investigation was ever announced, into a political rival despite the fact that Joe wasn't even running yet when all this started, and for political gain despite the fact that no "gain" has been shown nor demonstrated!

Considering that a president IS his foreign policy by every rule in the Constitution, the democrats lack any "victim" here, and the fact that they announced their intention to impeach Trump THREE YEARS AGO then went through their bogus hearings before Christmas with end goal announced in advance conducted so as to fit their holiday timetable, we all know this is total BULLSHIT.

Trump just had requests for 112,000 tickets for a rally in a blue state.

CAN YOU READ THE WRITING ON THE WALL?

Trump is acquitted and goes on to win 2020 this fall in an even bigger landslide slobber-knocker to the dismay of tards everywhere, then kicks it up a notch and gets right back to business in busting progressive heinie everywhere.

So good. So good.


View attachment 303385

LOLOL

Of course there's a distinction, boobtoob.

No one is saying Biden can't be investigated. Exactly how dense are you??

 

[JusticeHammer]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

That's nice. So then you won't have a problem if we get to the bottom of Biden's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

Go right ahead -- just do it legally.

Like shitty Schiff and co. has done it legally. Trump 2020.

 

[The Original Tree]

Everything is tied to The Whistleblower. Once he is exposed and you see his political ties to Joe Biden, & an Avalanche of Indictments will follow.

Justice Roberts blocks Sen. Paul from naming whistleblower, source says – and Paul may force the issue

All Roads Lead To Ukraine

Don't forget one of the first things Trump did when he got in to office was do audits sending all these bureacrats in to a panicked state.

How did Hillary Clinton ‘lose’ $6 billion at the State Department?

One has to wonder why The Obama Administration, Clinton Campaign, Obama State Department, and Podesta Group were throwing so much money in to The Ukraine Elections to Oppose an Anti-Corruption Government that was trying to get elected there.

Obama did his dirty work through The Podesta Group, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, Joe Biden, and The US Embassy In Ukraine, and funneled money in to a Ukraine NGO owned by Soros to oppose The Anti Corruption Candidates in Ukraine. Manfort and Gates were heavily used by The Obama Administration and Podesta Group for operations in Ukraine.

Then after that election when The Anti-Corruption Government was Elected, The Ukrainian Politicians Obama was supporting all fled to Russia.

Then Obama Seals his records on Ukraine citing Executive Privilege!

Then Obama had The Clinton Campaign be granted Full Blanket Immunity!

Then Obama had The Podesta Group be granted Full Blanket Immunity!

A Whistle Blower rats on Clinton about her secret Server which Obama denies knowledge of despite being caught in a lie when it was revealed he and his staff used aliases to communicate clandestinely with Clinton on that server so they could avoid FOIA and other types of discovery.

Comey Allows Clinton To Bleach Bit Her Server of 33,000 Emails!

The IT tech who Bleach Bitted Clinton's Server in violation of 2 Federal Court Orders is given immunity in exchange for testimony. He is asked 256 questions about his actions and about what he knows and despite having full immunity, pleads the 5th 256 Times!

Guccifer who says he and other countries did hack Clinton's Server despite The Obama Administration saying that never happened. Guccifer also says, he knows the original DNC Server was shipped to The Ukraine to hide it, and then an "edited copy" of the hard drive was given to Crowdstrike.

No Subpoena is ever issued on The DNC Server which The DNC Claimed was hacked and exposed Podesta's Emails. Only Crowdstrike looks at a copy of the VHD from the DNC Server and claims Russia hacked it. Weeks later, they had to retract nearly all of their statements as IT Techs all over the blogosphere called them out on all of their logical fallacies, errors, and technical nonsense. Lies in laymen terms.

Guccifer is arrested, extradited to The US and is locked up and is never heard from again.

Hillary Clinton Destroys 17 Electronic Devices!
Pakistani Hackers Hired by Clinton, Destroy dozens of hard drives as they flee The US!

Seth Rich gets murdered after uploading Podesta Emails to Assange.
The Remaining Hacker goes with Hillary Clinton to work on her campaign, despite being caught prying in to Congressional Files!

Comey sweeps all Clinton's Crimes Under the Rug.

The Obama Administration launches Russian Collusion COUP Hoax based on Russian Dirty Dossier he paid for that we now find out actually originated from The Ukraine and US Embassy. This Russian or Ukrainian Propaganda is later used falsely in FISA to get Wiretap Warrants on The Trump Campaign.

Gates and Manafort who worked for Obama and knew what was going on in The Ukraine, have their homes raided, are placed in solitary confinement, convicted on bogus charges and are never heard from again.

Julian Assange who says he got the Podesta Emails from Seth Rich is eventually Extradited, Locked Up and has never been hear from again!

Trump makes a phone call to congratulate The Ukraine President who ran on a Anti-Corruption Ukraine platform and then asks him to keep him informed about rumors of alleged corruption in Ukraine committed by The Obama Administration.

A Few weeks Later, Vindman a Ukrainian and his Brother who works for Adam Schiff, helps Adam Schiff and Eric Ciaramella write a Bogus Whistle Blower Report on a call to Ukraine!

Suddenly old footage of Joe Biden threatening The Ukraine to fire The Prosecutor Resurface as some people realize there is something fishy going on with this whole never ending attempt to remove President Trump.

Joe Biden:
"Fire The Prosecutor Investigating Hunter, or you aren't getting The Millions"!

President Trump shocks Schiff and releases The Transcript! contradicting The Whistle Blower Report

Schiff gets up in front of America and reads a completely Sham and Fictitious Manufactured Version of that phone call Transcript!

Adam Schiff who originally said everyone would get to interview The Whistle Blower shuts that down, says No, and then interrupts anyone who even dares to get close to revealing who The Whistle Blower is in testimony.

Schiff then has The IG Interview transcript which is critical of Schiff and The Whistleblower and seems to indicate Schiff lied about contact with The Whistleblower classified as "Intelligence" and refuses to allow The Trump Defense team to see that transcript. No one has seen it yet, and Schiff is refusing to turn it over.

The Pelosi Lead House Rushes to start an impeachment about The Ukraine phone call despite The Ukraine President telling The House, that their accusations are false. Adam Schiff refuses to release memos of his conversations with Vindman and The Whistle Blower, or The IGs testimony.

Hunter Biden refuses to comply with a Judges Order to turn over his Financial Records documenting his earnings at Burisma in his Child Support Case.

Joe Biden states he will refuse to comply with a Senate Subpoena to answer any questions about anything he knows about Ukraine or Burisma.

And here we are today.

 

[Coyote]

No one said you can't investigate a candidate who is running for president.

That's nice. So then you won't have a problem if we get to the bottom of Biden's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

Of course not. By all means if there is evidence of corruption launch a legit investigation through the DoJ. What has been holding you up?

 

[The Original Tree]

Eric Ciarmella's Lawyer, Zaid is the Attorney who tweeted out #COUP, # Resistance, #Impeachment, # Resistance, and said "The Impeachment has begun" DURING THE SWEARING ON OF PRESIDENT TRUMP.

Erica Ciaramella is Whistleblower # 1 who met with Schiff whom Schiff and Roberts are shielding and it is also why Schiff refuses to turn over the IG transcript because it shows that Schiff and his staff conspired and colluded with Zaid, Vindman, and Eric Ciaramella to launch COUP 2.0, and Impeachment attempt #7.

Ciaramella's Lawyer Sends 'Cease and Desist' Letter to White House, but the Law Is on the President's Side


Mark Levin: I want to explain to the American people, in a way that that even Joe Scarborough can understand what the law is here. Because you’re hearing a lot of lies from Schiff, the Democrats and these phony legal analysts.

The whistleblower statute DOES NOT apply to the President of the United States. It does not apply to conversations the President of the United States has with leaders of other countries. And it does not apply to foreign policy. So the whistleblower statute does not apply to the President or this phone call. Number one. I hope Richard Burr is listening – the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee which is really not a very intelligent committee.

Number two, the so-called whistleblower does not have statutory protections. He doesn’t meet the statutory elements.

Number three the law does not guarantee anonymity to a whistleblower. Only the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community is to keep it confidential with certain exceptions. The President can release the name, Congress can, the media’s not bound. Interestingly enough, the intelligence community did release his name. Adam Schiff did release his name by accident last night. (I posted about that here.)

How can you impeach a president, a process that was triggered by this guy, who is a political hack, without the House, the Senate, the President, scrutinizing his motives, his credibility and his veracity.

Adam Schiff, like a good mobster, decided that you can’t call this guy as a witness, you can’t call me [Schiff] as a witness because I [Schiff] won’t give you approval. So the head mobster decides, “I’m in charge of who the witnesses can be.” So it’s a grand cover-up.

The law is on the President’s side. The facts are on the President’s side.

We do need the whistleblower to testify, Shiff to testify because the whole house of cards will collapse because the American people will see what this was – an outrageous unconscionable attack by them on the President!

NPR asked four “legal experts” if Trump can legally out the whistleblower. All agreed that it would not violate any laws.

In remarks to “The War Room” on Friday morning, President Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani said he would like to interview both Ciaramella and Adam Schiff. He said:

I’d like to ask Schiff how this all came about. Then I’d like to ask that lawyer who said there was going to be a coup, how they were going to take them out. The anonymous source also turns out to be a political activist.

You cannot be convicted by anonymous accusers without facing your accuser in any place but the former Soviet Union… Just because you’re a whistleblower doesn’t mean you’re a saint. It’s in the 6th Amendment in the Constitution. Schiff has completely trashed the Constitution. They are going after the president’s lawyers… They are conducting at least 20 investigations of me. .. He (Trump) is entitled to a defense. Otherwise we’re not America.