Yes, You're a Capitalist

Norman

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
31,254
15,197
1,590
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote. No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.
 
Last edited:
I definately know that when my brother in law needs money or help on a project I find a place to hide. It is just human nature to be selfish sometimes especially when it comes to money and work.
 
And that only works until you have drained the "others". Then what?

Generally speaking they start draining those who are either too young to vote or have yet to be born, that is until sanity prevails and no one in there right mind will lend them any more money, in which case, explicit default or hyperinflation occurs.
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then forcing the peers to behave in accordance to the result. No one suddenly starts hitting people if they don't want to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.

I put this into Google Translate for an English version. Got nothin'.
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then forcing the peers to behave in accordance to the result. No one suddenly starts hitting people if they don't want to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.

I put this into Google Translate for an English version. Got nothin'.

Tolerant liberals again, showing their compassion to a guy who wasn't born in USA....

They can't even understand what is it that foreigners say, but yet claim diversity is workable?

Yup.

By the way, others understood it just fine. Perhaps if you weren't educated at a public school or actually valued education...
 
Last edited:
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then forcing the peers to behave in accordance to the result. No one suddenly starts hitting people if they don't want to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.

I put this into Google Translate for an English version. Got nothin'.

Tolerant liberals again, showing their compassion to a guy who wasn't born in USA....

They can't even understand what is it that foreigners say, but yet claim diversity is workable?

Yup.

By the way, others understood it just fine. Perhaps if you weren't educated at a public school or actually valued education...

All these words and not a cerebral finger was lifted to explain wtf the thread is about.

Oh well, obviously there wasn't enough to bother.

And btw you know zero about what my education is so go forth and fuck yourself.
 




Capitalism is the ONLY moral systemCapitalism — Ayn Rand Lexicon


Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.

The recognition of individual rights entails the banishment of physical force from human relationships: basically, rights can be violated only by means of force. In a capitalist society, no man or group may initiate the use of physical force against others. The only function of the government, in such a society, is the task of protecting man’s rights, i.e., the task of protecting him from physical force; the government acts as the agent of man’s right of self-defense, and may use force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use; thus the government is the means of placing the retaliatory use of force under objective control


Ayn Rand

.
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then forcing the peers to behave in accordance to the result. No one suddenly starts hitting people if they don't want to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.

I put this into Google Translate for an English version. Got nothin'.

Tolerant liberals again, showing their compassion to a guy who wasn't born in USA....

They can't even understand what is it that foreigners say, but yet claim diversity is workable?

Yup.

By the way, others understood it just fine. Perhaps if you weren't educated at a public school or actually valued education...

All these words and not a cerebral finger was lifted to explain wtf the thread is about.

Oh well, obviously there wasn't enough to bother.

And btw you know zero about what my education is so go forth and fuck yourself.

Honestly, I don't know what to tell you. Either you lack the IQ or the education. Perhaps both? Or maybe it's the Marxist indoctrination? Oh, you have provided ample statistical evidence as to what your education most likely is. I know a lot more than "zero".

What specific line of the text do you not understand? The text simply stated the fact that in our personal lives we generally are voluntarist/capitalist and don't try coerce people, as is the case in majoritarian politics. Obviously there are some thieves, abusers and other folks who do not adhere to this generalization... perhaps that is your problem?
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote. No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.
If that's your definition of Free Market Capitalism as it exists you must be living in a cave.
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote. No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.
If that's your definition of Free Market Capitalism as it exists you must be living in a cave.

Where in the text did you find a definition for capitalism? Because as a writer of the text... I am certain... it isn't there. Perhaps you are hallucinating? Common among regressives.

But here is the definition anyway, so that you can learn:

Capitalism:
an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

The social principle of which is:

Voluntarism:
the principle of relying on voluntary action.

Which is generally how most people live their lives outside of government coercion. There are exceptions, and many of them... of course.
 
Last edited:
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote. No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.
If that's your definition of Free Market Capitalism as it exists you must be living in a cave.

Where in the text did you find a definition for capitalism? Because as a writer of the text... I am certain... it isn't there. Perhaps you are hallucinating? Common among regressives.

But here is the definition anyway, so that you can learn:

Capitalism:
an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

The social principle of which is:

Voluntarism:
the principle of relying on voluntary action.

Which is generally how most people live their lives outside of government coercion. There are exceptions, and many of them... of course.

I guess eating is voluntary and has nothing to do with climate, metabolism or income.
 
Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations. No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote. No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

So indeed, everyone (who is sane) is a capitalist, when it comes to their personal relations. It's only when the avenue for voting yourself the earnings of others opens, that people become accepting of coercion and socialism. Only then, some people (regressives) see nothing wrong with coercion.
If that's your definition of Free Market Capitalism as it exists you must be living in a cave.

Where in the text did you find a definition for capitalism? Because as a writer of the text... I am certain... it isn't there. Perhaps you are hallucinating? Common among regressives.

But here is the definition anyway, so that you can learn:

Capitalism:
an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

The social principle of which is:

Voluntarism:
the principle of relying on voluntary action.

Which is generally how most people live their lives outside of government coercion. There are exceptions, and many of them... of course.

I guess eating is voluntary and has nothing to do with climate, metabolism or income.

You got that right, eating is voluntary. You don't have to be that fat, no one is forcing you... But if you choose to eat a lot... well you get fat.

Voluntarism doesn't mean being free of consequences. It simply means being able make choices in the absence of coercion.
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE/]"No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote."[/QUOTE]

Major fail unless you want to be a loner.
 
Honestly, I don't know what to tell you. Either you lack the IQ or the education. Perhaps both? Or maybe it's the Marxist indoctrination? Oh, you have provided ample statistical evidence as to what your education most likely is. I know a lot more than "zero".

Or perhaps your writing is simply what's known in technical terms as "fucked up". But let's blame the reader for the writer's failure. There's a good plan...


What specific line of the text do you not understand? The text simply stated the fact that in our personal lives we generally are voluntarist/capitalist and don't try coerce people, as is the case in majoritarian politics. Obviously there are some thieves, abusers and other folks who do not adhere to this generalization... perhaps that is your problem?

You don't have the vaguest clue who I am, so fuck you very much, and your assumptions too.


Now since you FINALLY got 'round to the issue:

Everybody is a capitalist/voluntarist when it comes to their personal relations.

Absurd. Personal relations are not some kind of commodity.

Then it just digs itself deeper....


No one solves their issues in life by voting with their peers and then force the peers to behave in accordance to the result of the vote.

What in the wide world of fuck is that supposed to mean?


No one suddenly starts hitting people when the people don't wish to fulfill specific whims of the person (not including some regressive leftists here who beat up their innocent kids daily, to extract maximum value, and then come complain about child labor here).

Again, nothing to do with "capital". Yer lost, dood.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top