Yes, Kyle Rittenhouse is a Hero

So you advocate trying to stop a man who may have shot another, THAT is vigilantism.
BINGO.gif
 
Would you have made all the moves Kyle chose to make, if under the same circumstance? Was his actions, what any reasonable man would do?

If I was in his place I would have wiped out the crowd, anyone not running away from me at the point where I had been knocked to the ground and assaulted would have been perforated. Kyle was overly restrained tactically speaking.

If you saw a person shoot and kill a man, run away from the crime scene, with the killing rifle in tow....would you chase him, to stop him, then turn him over the police?

If I saw a man chase a kid with a rifle because the kid put out a dumpster fire, I would have made sure the kid escaped harm and helped him get to the police in order to file a report.

I'm so grateful Matt and I were not there, because I think Matt would have run after him, to stop him, and would likely be dead today or crippled...!!!!

Then Matt is an imbecile and deserves to die. If you would be willing to participate in the destruction of property with leftwing terrorist scumbags, you deserve to die. Please do not procreate and add CO2 to the atmosphere.

Kyle is no hero.... He's a high school drop out, who was bullied in school, enough so, to quit. With parents that are divorced, and not a bleep of common sense in child rearing....!!!!!!

That makes absolutely no difference to make as far as his self defense goes, but good kids are bullied by asshole kids all the time. If Kyle was a bed wetting jabbering liberal retard who wore skirts to school, you'd be apoplectic that anyone said anything derogatory to him, let alone "bullied him".

I accept the jury's verdict, because it was their decision to make.....under the law.

And common fucking sense.


But in no way shape or form, is he a hero.... I hope he gets therapy! He needed it, before the Kenosha killings.

It's abundantly clear that you need therapy if you believe a kid who volunteers to clean up graffiti, is a member of a VFD's junior program and aspires to be in Law enforcement is a problem and the green haired pieces of shit who destroyed a city aren't. Not one human being was harmed or even put in danger by Kyle. He stepped in 2 and a half piles of dogshit as far as I'm concerned.

I could even sympathize with the anger of the bed wetters protesting if Jacob Blake himself wasn't a complete piece of shit, but he is a piece of shit, the people who destroyed Kenosha are pieces of shit, the DA's who charged Kyle are malignant sociopaths who deserve to get assfucked to death in prison and Epstein didn't kill himself.


.


I don't think that if I was in the same circumstance as Kyle, being attacked by that vigilante mob, that I would have had the same discipline.

I probably would have shot a half dozen more.
 
In most all cases, Vigilantism is lawlessness, not justice....

Vigilante justice often describes the actions of a single person or group of people who claim to enforce the law but lack the legal authority to do so. However, the term can also describe a general state of disarray or lawlessness, in which competing groups of people all claim to enforce the law in a given area.

Vigilante justice | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Informati…

View attachment 567539
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vigilante_justice
Mr. Rittenhouse was requested by an automobile merchant of Kenosha to help guard his carlot from ruthless thieves and A deafeated police force whose hands were tied behind their backs by chaos-seeking Marxists in DC from protecting peace for job-producing merchants. These business corporations saw mob rule that stole or destroyed the car merchant's inventory of a hundred cars the night before for which the evil desired to expand their exploits of all viable mom and pop shops as well as big businesses with outlets in and around Kenosha WI.

Mr. Rittenhouse was on his way to the friend's business that had been so ransaked the night before.

Preventing the local police from acting in the defense of the people in their own town caused Mr. Rittenhouse's ordeal. The only one who could save him was himself. I'm sure he paid in spades for the prosecutor's flippant attitude toward the Second Amendment's self defense ruling laws still being impacted as the rule of law which must stand. I can't believe the left is hateful enough to want to destroy the revolutionary ideal of an armed citizenry's way of dealing with hatred for stationary citizens witb the right to keep and bear arms.

God bless and keep Mr. Rittenhouse for his consciencious hand given t
 
I don't think that if I was in the same circumstance as Kyle, being attacked by that vigilante mob, that I would have had the same discipline.

I probably would have shot a half dozen more.
At the point where he was knocked to the ground, anyone within 10 yards and not running away should have been receiving fire. Tactically he fucked up, but then again it was a horde of cowardly bed wetting liberal pieces of shit.


.
 
The sunshine patriots are at it again, folks. In either another unreciprocated attempt to appear even-handed, or from a deep sense of shame at their own meekness, a number of conservatives are bleating that, while they support Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal, they nonetheless take pains to emphasize that he is not a hero.

Tom Slater at Spiked writes that Rittenhouse should have stayed at home. John Kass of the Chicago Tribune also writes that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have been there, and that he’ll carry the “stain” of this forever. Tiana Lowe at the Washington Examiner writes that Rittenhouse’s victimization doesn’t automatically confer heroism, and that he “should never have gone to an active riot zone in defiance of a curfew.” Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz (who defended Jeffrey Epstein in court and who argues the age of consent for sex should be fifteen) likewise says Rittenhouse shouldn’t have come to Kenosha.

Former police chief Dan Llorens lets readers know six times that Rittenhouse is “no hero” and speculates that, as Rittenhouse grows older, “perhaps he will begin to understand.” Because nothing wins over a skeptical audience like belittling condescension. Yet, one wonders how the Kenosha police officers -- the ones actually there during the riots -- felt about the armed citizen patrols as they handed them bottled water and told them, “We appreciate you guys, we really do.” Perhaps Llorens could lecture these officers about their need to “begin to understand.”

To the aforementioned commentators, allow me a polite suggestion. Next time your country, city, or neighbor needs some fellow citizens willing to step up, take your own advice and stay home. There is some clear misunderstanding on your part as to the meaning of heroism. If being a hero means penning opinions from the safety of our computers,

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

1fd49dffcedf5400a6b5823570ee0195ca116273814a78e3b405b3485b20bf7c.jpg

61719ce74d5b8f1f.jpg

I presume that this is controversial enough!
No he isn't.

He's a stupid boy who's litany of poor decisions put him in a situation that never needed to happen.
 
In most all cases, Vigilantism is lawlessness, not justice....

Vigilante justice often describes the actions of a single person or group of people who claim to enforce the law but lack the legal authority to do so. However, the term can also describe a general state of disarray or lawlessness, in which competing groups of people all claim to enforce the law in a given area.

Vigilante justice | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Informati…

View attachment 567539
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/vigilante_justice
Kind of like the mob that was chasing Rittenhouse supposedly to stop an active shooter?
 
You may not know this but Kyle was found innocent of being a murderer by a jury.

What else you got Moon Bat?
They twisted the definition of self defense to let him walk, he still.murdered those guys
 
Were any of the grannies attacking that animal? What about the children? Produce the video if you got it.
They were blocking his way. He got scared. Clear cut case of self defense by the new republican definition.
 
If your hero is a murderer you need serious help

They were blocking his way. He got scared. Clear cut case of self defense by the new republican definition.
wow ! there is absolutely nothing to gain from that statement ! are you actually taking the side of a man that ran over innocent children ? 5 people celebrating Christmas are dead killed by a maniac leftist radical ! are you trying to equate the people shot that were rioting and chasing Kyle with the intent to do him harm with the dozens of people hit by the man in Waukesha ?
 
Last edited:
They twisted the definition of self defense to let him walk, he still.murdered those guys


Only twisted in your mind Moon Bat. It was clear in the minds of the jury because they heard all the evidence and the vote to acquit was unanimous. If it wasn't unanimous then it would have been a hung jury.
 
wow ! there is absolutely nothing to gain from that statement ! are you actually taking the side of a man that ran over innocent children ? 5 people celebrating Christmas are dead killed by a maniac leftist radical ! are you trying to equate the people shot that were rioting and chasing Kyle with the intent to do him harm with the dozens of people hit by the man in Waukesha ?
Creep is not above giggling over dead children if it's only 7 steps away from bashing President Trump. I'm actually surprised he didn't say Trump got the knuckler worked up (a 2017 tweet?) and it should get a free pass.

Dead children are just late term abortions to those soulless animals. They can't rape them anymore, their voting is limited to mail-in only now.... what good are they?
 
The sunshine patriots are at it again, folks. In either another unreciprocated attempt to appear even-handed, or from a deep sense of shame at their own meekness, a number of conservatives are bleating that, while they support Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal, they nonetheless take pains to emphasize that he is not a hero.

Tom Slater at Spiked writes that Rittenhouse should have stayed at home. John Kass of the Chicago Tribune also writes that Rittenhouse shouldn’t have been there, and that he’ll carry the “stain” of this forever. Tiana Lowe at the Washington Examiner writes that Rittenhouse’s victimization doesn’t automatically confer heroism, and that he “should never have gone to an active riot zone in defiance of a curfew.” Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz (who defended Jeffrey Epstein in court and who argues the age of consent for sex should be fifteen) likewise says Rittenhouse shouldn’t have come to Kenosha.

Former police chief Dan Llorens lets readers know six times that Rittenhouse is “no hero” and speculates that, as Rittenhouse grows older, “perhaps he will begin to understand.” Because nothing wins over a skeptical audience like belittling condescension. Yet, one wonders how the Kenosha police officers -- the ones actually there during the riots -- felt about the armed citizen patrols as they handed them bottled water and told them, “We appreciate you guys, we really do.” Perhaps Llorens could lecture these officers about their need to “begin to understand.”

To the aforementioned commentators, allow me a polite suggestion. Next time your country, city, or neighbor needs some fellow citizens willing to step up, take your own advice and stay home. There is some clear misunderstanding on your part as to the meaning of heroism. If being a hero means penning opinions from the safety of our computers,

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

1fd49dffcedf5400a6b5823570ee0195ca116273814a78e3b405b3485b20bf7c.jpg

61719ce74d5b8f1f.jpg

I presume that this is controversial enough!
What are the chances he lives out his dream of, being a real cop ?
 
Only twisted in your mind Moon Bat. It was clear in the minds of the jury because they heard all the evidence and the vote to acquit was unanimous. If it wasn't unanimous then it would have been a hung jury.
As innocent as OJ. He‘ll spend the rest of his life paying off law suits and looking over his shoulder.
 
Kind of like the mob that was chasing Rittenhouse supposedly to stop an active shooter?
No, not like that at all.... The crowd chasing him was due to Kyle killing a man just minutes earlier, wasn't it? On one video I watched when it happened, I thought the crowd was screaming, stop him, he just shot a man or just killed a man!??
 
so ...you're saying that the left is going to try to do physical harm to him because they dont like the verdict ?
Nope. He‘ll probably should be more in fear of the proud boys who gave him all the $$$ just so he can lose it in the law suits. Hero’s on the right are anyone who can steal tax monies or get away with a crime. They luv that shit.
 
All these idiots saying he “shouldn’t had been there”.

No, the rioters that were imported in didn’t belong there. Half of them had illegal weapons too. The Democrat mayor and governor allowed BLM to terrorize the city, they ordered the police back, they refused to send in national guard.

The only thing that keeps us a civilized society is the rule of law, back up with honorable men with guns.

They had 300 national guard.
 
On the Tucker Carlson show, Kyle said he "supported BLM and only shot white people."

It was a heroic thing to say.
He also said he supported peaceful demonstrations.

I do too. I do not support riots involving looting and burning.

I personally admire Rittenhouse. I am not overly impressed with people his age today but he is an exception.
 

Forum List

Back
Top