Yes, elections have consequences....Here's one.

[nat4900]

It depends on the regulation. The ones Obama wanted to impose on us had huge costs but would have produced no noticeable improvement in the environment. The problem with environmental wackos like you is that you believe cost is no object. Getting rid of the first 90% of a particular contaminate might cost 'X' amount of dollars. Getting rid of the next 9% of that contaminate would cost 10 times 'X', and getting rid of the next 0.9% will cost 100 times 'X', but you ******* economic morons don't see any problem with demanding the elimination of 100%.

You're all as stupid as cockroaches.

Scum buckets like YOU.......are naive enough to object to stronger regulations because they're too costly....but then are stupid enough to NOT acknowledge the costs that we ALL have to pay to fix the ******* problems caused by not having those "costly" regulations........Fucked up "rationale."

 

[bripat9643]

It depends on the regulation. The ones Obama wanted to impose on us had huge costs but would have produced no noticeable improvement in the environment. The problem with environmental wackos like you is that you believe cost is no object. Getting rid of the first 90% of a particular contaminate might cost 'X' amount of dollars. Getting rid of the next 9% of that contaminate would cost 10 times 'X', and getting rid of the next 0.9% will cost 100 times 'X', but you ******* economic morons don't see any problem with demanding the elimination of 100%.

You're all as stupid as cockroaches.

Scum buckets like YOU.......are naive enough to object to stronger regulations because they're too costly....but then are stupid enough to NOT acknowledge the costs that we ALL have to pay to fix the ******* problems caused by not having those "costly" regulations........Fucked up "rationale."

There's nothing stupid about objecting to costly regulations. On the other hand, the costs you talk about are almost entirely imaginary. The EPA whips them up out of nothing. They pay off organizations like The American Lung Association to produced grossly inflated estimates of the healthcare costs resulting from coal fired power plants. Their cost estimates have been found time again to have no connection with reality.

 

[Avatar4321]

It depends on the regulation. The ones Obama wanted to impose on us had huge costs but would have produced no noticeable improvement in the environment. The problem with environmental wackos like you is that you believe cost is no object. Getting rid of the first 90% of a particular contaminate might cost 'X' amount of dollars. Getting rid of the next 9% of that contaminate would cost 10 times 'X', and getting rid of the next 0.9% will cost 100 times 'X', but you ******* economic morons don't see any problem with demanding the elimination of 100%.

You're all as stupid as cockroaches.

Scum buckets like YOU.......are naive enough to object to stronger regulations because they're too costly....but then are stupid enough to NOT acknowledge the costs that we ALL have to pay to fix the ******* problems caused by not having those "costly" regulations........Fucked up "rationale."

How is the mud wrestling?

 

[whitehall]

Yeah but Barry Hussein was in charge up to about eight months ago. Trump didn't change anything .

 

[GHook93]

23 Environmental Rules Rolled Back in Trump's First 100 Days - The .

As majors parts of Texas and Florida are flooded, one of the many, many hazards facing citizens of those two states, is the contaminated water running down streets and into people's homes.

There has been a toxic mixing of reservoir waters with the waters contaminated by hazardous materials that were placed in ponds, streams and even some rivers.

Our beloved Trump has rolled back most regulations preventing the dumping of such hazardous, waste materials, and those citizens who once applauded Trump's "courageous" and pro-business stances, are now facing the repercussions of such policies. Parents have been told to not let their children play in such pollution and that if they do, to wash them thoroughly (and of course, with WHAT clean water."

Yes, elections have consequences and the price tag is mighty high.

You do realize that the ones you mention are all just under review and not approved. You do realize that even Obama's EPA reviewed many of the same regulations for review!

Second, of the 8 that have been red back, 5 are great decisions and 3 are questionable.

Third, this article doesn't state what might have been put in place. Most of the time requirements like this don't just get rolled back, they get replaced. The NY slimes is purposely leaving those details out!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

23 Environmental Rules Rolled Back in Trump's First 100 Days - The .

As majors parts of Texas and Florida are flooded, one of the many, many hazards facing citizens of those two states, is the contaminated water running down streets and into people's homes.

There has been a toxic mixing of reservoir waters with the waters contaminated by hazardous materials that were placed in ponds, streams and even some rivers.

Our beloved Trump has rolled back most regulations preventing the dumping of such hazardous, waste materials, and those citizens who once applauded Trump's "courageous" and pro-business stances, are now facing the repercussions of such policies. Parents have been told to not let their children play in such pollution and that if they do, to wash them thoroughly (and of course, with WHAT clean water."

Yes, elections have consequences and the price tag is mighty high.

Yet another example of how reckless and irresponsible most Republicans are.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It depends on the regulation. The ones Obama wanted to impose on us had huge costs but would have produced no noticeable improvement in the environment. The problem with environmental wackos like you is that you believe cost is no object. Getting rid of the first 90% of a particular contaminate might cost 'X' amount of dollars. Getting rid of the next 9% of that contaminate would cost 10 times 'X', and getting rid of the next 0.9% will cost 100 times 'X', but you ******* economic morons don't see any problem with demanding the elimination of 100%.

You're all as stupid as cockroaches.

Scum buckets like YOU.......are naive enough to object to stronger regulations because they're too costly....but then are stupid enough to NOT acknowledge the costs that we ALL have to pay to fix the ******* problems caused by not having those "costly" regulations........Fucked up "rationale."

The state or fed could careless about impacts. They just want private companies to screw up so they can collect. I've seen if firsthand. Youre just regurgitating theoretical axioms that have nothing to do with the real world.

 

[BluesLegend]

23 Environmental Rules Rolled Back in Trump's First 100 Days - The .

As majors parts of Texas and Florida are flooded, one of the many, many hazards facing citizens of those two states, is the contaminated water running down streets and into people's homes.

There has been a toxic mixing of reservoir waters with the waters contaminated by hazardous materials that were placed in ponds, streams and even some rivers.

Our beloved Trump has rolled back most regulations preventing the dumping of such hazardous, waste materials, and those citizens who once applauded Trump's "courageous" and pro-business stances, are now facing the repercussions of such policies. Parents have been told to not let their children play in such pollution and that if they do, to wash them thoroughly (and of course, with WHAT clean water."

Yes, elections have consequences and the price tag is mighty high.

Yet another example of how reckless and irresponsible most Republicans are.

Your Dem run large cities spill hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage into public waterways, so fouling the water swimming has to be banned. You have zero cred on environmental issues.

 

[NLT]

23 Environmental Rules Rolled Back in Trump's First 100 Days - The .

Yes, elections have consequences and the price tag is mighty high.

MAGA

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The regulations that were rolled back were put in place by obama and specifically designed to increase the burdens on business. Keep new businesses from opening and force existing businesses to close. And that's just to prepare the paperwork.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Yes, elections have consequences..."

And the Trump ‘administration’ represents a negative consequence.