Wow! Mcconnell vows to vote on nominee!

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
69,350
Reaction score
12,458
Points
2,180



This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!
Fair play is now renamed:



Jo
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
This will motivate every voter to get out and vote. Suspect they will have control of Supreme Court, but not likely to win the Presidency or keep the Senate.
Who?

What if Trump says "let's wait until after the election"? That is going to ensure they ALL vote. Even the RINOS will be cornered.

If Trump does it before, he chooses a woman and gains more female votes. He's in a win/win situation.
Voters will look at it as a complete betrayal by MCConnell, who said 10 months before election is too close before an election to make such a decision. They will take it out on Senate Republicans and on trump.
If by voters you mean the radical left then yes, I agree.
Otherwise most common folk are gonna look at all the shit going on in our nation right now, mostly caused by democrats and rectify that first.
NO, actually I was talking voters in general. Some people value fair play, and pushing through this time would not look like fair play, unless done after election, and trump won the election.
There is no fair play anymore. Kavanaugh hearings demonstrated that.

Jo

If the republicans nominated and appointed a replacement...that would be fair play since the rules....The Constitution.....give them that actual ability......

The democrats smearing Justice Kavanaugh was not fair play....obama using illegal FISA warrants to spy on Trump...was not fair play....obama using the FBI to destroy General Flynn...was not fair play......obama using the IRS to deny 501c3 status to conservative groups...was not fair play......the democrats impeaching Trump for a normal phone call...was not fair play...the democrats burning, looting, beating and murdering Americans and assassinating police officers.....is not fair play.

So White 6 can shove that "Fair Play," bullshit where the shun doesn't shine.....
Just sayin, since you are well aware how Moscow Mitch handled it 10 months out from election. If you do not want to see it as average voters, do the trumpian thing and don't look.
"Average" voters don't pay any attention to this shit. The percentage of people in this country who are actually informed is terribly low.
I have heard. So you think it will be a low volume presidential election?
Not at all.

Orange man bad will drive both sides to the polls regardless of their understanding of current events.

You think my analysis is wrong?
Wrong? Yes.

Look at the discourse here. People who never leave their apartment are arguing over the best ways to manage a forest so it doesn't burn. There may be something like a few dozen true experts on the topic in the nation. You have even less people who are true experts on viral disease. That doesn't stop the "average" people here from weighing in on the best way to avoid covid.

If your point is/was that people don't pay attention...you're wrong.
If your point is/was that not understanding the topics will cause apathy...you're way wrong.
View attachment 391097
You live in a pasture? Explains a lot.
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
85,729
Reaction score
16,047
Points
2,180
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
One million of you guys? LOL... You won't do shit boy.
Did you dress up like PeeWee Herman when you were turning tricks?

1600691652694.png


{

Emmett Macfarlane, a professor at the University of Waterloo in Canada, tweeted: "Burn Congress down before letting Trump try to appoint anyone to SCOTUS."

Political commentator Laura Bassett, who writes for GQ and the Washington Post, said: "If McConnell jams someone through, which he will, there will be riots."

Daddy Files author Aaron Gouveia tweeted: "F*** no. Burn it all down."

Last night Ocasio-Cortez said Republicans were "violating" Justice Ginsburg's dying wish that she should not be replaced until the next president is sworn in.

The firebrand congresswoman stoked the row still further by saying Democrats should “absolutely” consider packing the court.

She said: “We should leave all options on the table, including the number of justices that are on the Supreme Court.”

Democrat nominee Joe Biden is due to make a speech on the subject later today, but has so far resisted Trump's call for him to name his own shortlist.

}

 

Claudette

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
38,827
Reaction score
9,068
Points
1,330

This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!


Jo
Can Trump improve his chances by immediately electing a female judge? There was a Constitutional Christian who was a choice right he was struggling with before he chose Kavanaugh, right? Whether they to go a vote now or later, it helps Trump. It may help Trump even MORE if he says "wait until after the election"?

What does this do to the influence of the weak Never Trumpers? I've listened to you all for 4 years, and it's clear GOP voters don't want MORE people making up the law as they go, so, this will ensure a wave of support.

I think Trump is ballsy enough to force the vote now, he isn't a politician, he doesn't care if they dislike him or not.
Yup and he should push for it now. As you said, Trump doesn't give shit one what people think of him. I sure hope he pushes and I hope it Barrett who's a Constitutional Judge. We need more of those people of the SC.
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
35,368
Reaction score
4,382
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard

This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!


Jo
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
The only thing that makes sense to me it that he prefers Biden to Trump and figures that even before RBG passed he was less than 50-50 to hold the senate with 51 votes and the Dems will blow up the filibuster anyway … and Biden won't support packing the Court.
 

dblack

Platinum Member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
36,313
Reaction score
4,487
Points
1,130
"The American people‎ should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new President," McConnell said in a statement hours after Scalia died in February 2016. - Mitch McConnell
Things have changed.

Fuck the Communists.
This is going to be a chaotic shit show
So, SOP for the Trump administration?
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,929
Reaction score
9,836
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,929
Reaction score
9,836
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
One million of you guys? LOL... You won't do shit boy.
Did you dress up like PeeWee Herman when you were turning tricks?

View attachment 391267

{

Emmett Macfarlane, a professor at the University of Waterloo in Canada, tweeted: "Burn Congress down before letting Trump try to appoint anyone to SCOTUS."

Political commentator Laura Bassett, who writes for GQ and the Washington Post, said: "If McConnell jams someone through, which he will, there will be riots."

Daddy Files author Aaron Gouveia tweeted: "F*** no. Burn it all down."

Last night Ocasio-Cortez said Republicans were "violating" Justice Ginsburg's dying wish that she should not be replaced until the next president is sworn in.

The firebrand congresswoman stoked the row still further by saying Democrats should “absolutely” consider packing the court.

She said: “We should leave all options on the table, including the number of justices that are on the Supreme Court.”

Democrat nominee Joe Biden is due to make a speech on the subject later today, but has so far resisted Trump's call for him to name his own shortlist.

}

I love it when the nutters say you ain't going to do shit boy If we did there is nothing in the way to stopping it from happening
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
35,368
Reaction score
4,382
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard
I would bet most voters do.
You're going to find out.

1 million Marxists will soon start a war against America. You think that is a majority...
One million of you guys? LOL... You won't do shit boy.
McConnell is going to singlehandly increase women voting for Biden in Pa, Mich, Wis, and Minn, not to mention Iowa and Ariz where two gop women senators are either already losers or in toss ups. Collins could possibly vote AGAINST a gop nominee, but that probably is no benefit to her.

McConnell probably has no option given the hundreds of millions the xians have spent to reverse Roe.

And the dems WILL HAVE to respond for their own base if they take the senate. Manchin and Sienna don't want to vote to either end the filibuster or increase the senate to 54.
 

beautress

Always Faithful
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
16,355
Reaction score
8,328
Points
1,295
Location
Walker County, TX

This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!


Jo
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
The only thing that makes sense to me it that he prefers Biden to Trump and figures that even before RBG passed he was less than 50-50 to hold the senate with 51 votes and the Dems will blow up the filibuster anyway … and Biden won't support packing the Court.
Things have changed..ya, hypocrites now control everything
Only the house.

View attachment 391174
Outta the park, Mr Uncensored2008.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
61,848
Reaction score
12,039
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.



This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!
Fair play is now renamed:



Jo
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
This will motivate every voter to get out and vote. Suspect they will have control of Supreme Court, but not likely to win the Presidency or keep the Senate.
Who?

What if Trump says "let's wait until after the election"? That is going to ensure they ALL vote. Even the RINOS will be cornered.

If Trump does it before, he chooses a woman and gains more female votes. He's in a win/win situation.
Voters will look at it as a complete betrayal by MCConnell, who said 10 months before election is too close before an election to make such a decision. They will take it out on Senate Republicans and on trump.
If by voters you mean the radical left then yes, I agree.
Otherwise most common folk are gonna look at all the shit going on in our nation right now, mostly caused by democrats and rectify that first.
NO, actually I was talking voters in general. Some people value fair play, and pushing through this time would not look like fair play, unless done after election, and trump won the election.
There is no fair play anymore. Kavanaugh hearings demonstrated that.

Jo

If the republicans nominated and appointed a replacement...that would be fair play since the rules....The Constitution.....give them that actual ability......

The democrats smearing Justice Kavanaugh was not fair play....obama using illegal FISA warrants to spy on Trump...was not fair play....obama using the FBI to destroy General Flynn...was not fair play......obama using the IRS to deny 501c3 status to conservative groups...was not fair play......the democrats impeaching Trump for a normal phone call...was not fair play...the democrats burning, looting, beating and murdering Americans and assassinating police officers.....is not fair play.

So White 6 can shove that "Fair Play," bullshit where the shun doesn't shine.....
Just sayin, since you are well aware how Moscow Mitch handled it 10 months out from election. If you do not want to see it as average voters, do the trumpian thing and don't look.
"Average" voters don't pay any attention to this shit. The percentage of people in this country who are actually informed is terribly low.
I have heard. So you think it will be a low volume presidential election?
Not at all.

Orange man bad will drive both sides to the polls regardless of their understanding of current events.

You think my analysis is wrong?
Wrong? Yes.

Look at the discourse here. People who never leave their apartment are arguing over the best ways to manage a forest so it doesn't burn. There may be something like a few dozen true experts on the topic in the nation. You have even less people who are true experts on viral disease. That doesn't stop the "average" people here from weighing in on the best way to avoid covid.

If your point is/was that people don't pay attention...you're wrong.
If your point is/was that not understanding the topics will cause apathy...you're way wrong.
View attachment 391097
Probably because your doing a lousy job of doing it.
Really? We don't have smog. We don't have human beings shitting on the sidewalks. We don't have used drug needles on the beaches.

Clean up your own mess. Don't even make the mistake of believing you can tell me how to live.
 

daveman

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
61,848
Reaction score
12,039
Points
2,180
Location
On the way to the Dark Tower.



This is going to start a whole new round of crazy!
Fair play is now renamed:



Jo
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
This will motivate every voter to get out and vote. Suspect they will have control of Supreme Court, but not likely to win the Presidency or keep the Senate.
Who?

What if Trump says "let's wait until after the election"? That is going to ensure they ALL vote. Even the RINOS will be cornered.

If Trump does it before, he chooses a woman and gains more female votes. He's in a win/win situation.
Voters will look at it as a complete betrayal by MCConnell, who said 10 months before election is too close before an election to make such a decision. They will take it out on Senate Republicans and on trump.
If by voters you mean the radical left then yes, I agree.
Otherwise most common folk are gonna look at all the shit going on in our nation right now, mostly caused by democrats and rectify that first.
NO, actually I was talking voters in general. Some people value fair play, and pushing through this time would not look like fair play, unless done after election, and trump won the election.
There is no fair play anymore. Kavanaugh hearings demonstrated that.

Jo

If the republicans nominated and appointed a replacement...that would be fair play since the rules....The Constitution.....give them that actual ability......

The democrats smearing Justice Kavanaugh was not fair play....obama using illegal FISA warrants to spy on Trump...was not fair play....obama using the FBI to destroy General Flynn...was not fair play......obama using the IRS to deny 501c3 status to conservative groups...was not fair play......the democrats impeaching Trump for a normal phone call...was not fair play...the democrats burning, looting, beating and murdering Americans and assassinating police officers.....is not fair play.

So White 6 can shove that "Fair Play," bullshit where the shun doesn't shine.....
Just sayin, since you are well aware how Moscow Mitch handled it 10 months out from election. If you do not want to see it as average voters, do the trumpian thing and don't look.
"Average" voters don't pay any attention to this shit. The percentage of people in this country who are actually informed is terribly low.
I have heard. So you think it will be a low volume presidential election?
Not at all.

Orange man bad will drive both sides to the polls regardless of their understanding of current events.

You think my analysis is wrong?
Wrong? Yes.

Look at the discourse here. People who never leave their apartment are arguing over the best ways to manage a forest so it doesn't burn. There may be something like a few dozen true experts on the topic in the nation. You have even less people who are true experts on viral disease. That doesn't stop the "average" people here from weighing in on the best way to avoid covid.

If your point is/was that people don't pay attention...you're wrong.
If your point is/was that not understanding the topics will cause apathy...you're way wrong.
View attachment 391097
You live in a pasture? Explains a lot.
Well, it's no big city, like you're used to...




...but we're doing okay.
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
85,729
Reaction score
16,047
Points
2,180
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
He really has no choice politically. If he doesn't put a butt in that seat, the Democrats probably take the Senate because clearly that is the prize. They may take it anyway but instead of academic ideas about what a Democratic Controlled Senate would do...it would be you elect this...you get that or you get 4 years of "no" if the blob wins. The hypocrisy may cost R's the senate but he'll keep his seat. He may lose that if he were to not be a hypocrite.
The Communists will lose two seats in the Senate, Jones and Peters. McSally could lose a seat in Arizona, but the democrat terrorism of the last several months make that less than a sure thing. The message is simple and Clear, Kelly WILL take your guns; not a traditional fan favorite in Arizona. Worst case, the Americans pick up a net of 1.

What I think you Maoists should do is repeat the Kavanaugh spectacle during the Barrett confirmation. Maybe have your terrorist army try and burn down the SCOTUS. America loves it when your Brown Shirts beat the elderly in the streets too! Increase the intensity of your Kristalnacht.

Oh, no one believes your idiocy that seating Barrett on the court will hurt the Americans in the election, not you, me, no one. It's just a flaccid attempt by you of the Khmer Rouge to coerce the Americans not to do what is right.
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
85,729
Reaction score
16,047
Points
2,180
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
Yeah no reason except for what they did to Obama when he had every right to nominate someone to the court.
Oh he should wait for the election to be held and let the next president decide.

I am sure Trump will push for it and the line has been drawn

Obama nominated Garland. The Senate said "no."

Trump will nominate Barrett, the Senate will say "yes," and the Maoists will riot.
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
85,729
Reaction score
16,047
Points
2,180
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
McConnell is going to singlehandly increase women voting for Biden in Pa, Mich, Wis, and Minn, not to mention Iowa and Ariz where two gop women senators are either already losers or in toss ups. Collins could possibly vote AGAINST a gop nominee, but that probably is no benefit to her.

McConnell probably has no option given the hundreds of millions the xians have spent to reverse Roe.

And the dems WILL HAVE to respond for their own base if they take the senate. Manchin and Sienna don't want to vote to either end the filibuster or increase the senate to 54.
Sure, sure Comrade Traitor, we BETTER NOT, or all you Maoists who were going to vote against Trump in the first place will vote against him!

1600735097939.png
 

protectionist

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
39,876
Reaction score
7,320
Points
1,130
The American people (states) elected Donald Trump to be their president for FOUR YEARS, which includes nominating Supreme Court justices, and they expect him to do his job for ALL of that entire time. That includes September 2020.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top