Wow, best video and analysis yet of Renee Good's end - By CNN even

[Orangecat]

Would any reasonable person blow a persons head off in this circumstance? Was it a normal, reasonable response to being bumped? Would you have killed her?

If you try to run me down with a car, and I’m armed, damn straight you’re my target.

 

[Stann]

Just me or are these wives taking out their sexual frustrations, and perhaps their poor rearing environment too out on ICE? Wow, imagine harassing law enforcement all day.

This is a very good analysis of the situation. What isn't is their narration, but then it's CNN. Only thing missing seems to be video of these ladies, I mean "they" harassing ICE beforehand.

CNN couldn't help itself. Rather then say - just-havn'-fun-Renee drove toward the agent and struck him, as she, excuse me "they"☺ attempted to escape from agents after refusing orders - CNN chose lie and mislead with the left narration being: "This angle appears to show the vehicle moving close to the agent, but in this angle, he does not appear to be in the pathway of the vehicle when he fired".

Cause: Just-havn'-fun-Renee drove toward the agent and struck him after refusing orders to stop ******* around.

Effect: Not having fun agent shot her.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs

I prefer to see the video.without prejudicial narration. I actually think for myself.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

I prefer to see the video.without prejudicial narration. I actually think for myself.

Yeah, the best way to watch that video is on mute. That said, I find Democracked-speak to be at least somewhat informative. If they say the sky is green be sure it's something else. Even antonyms tell a true story, same projection.

 

[Hollie]

DO NOT INTERFERE WITH LE.

She was a TRAINED “WARRIOR”.

Many WARRIORS DIE.

And the left celebrates by dancing on the grave of their jihad warrior,

 

[HikerGuy83]

Sorry but I do not choose to agree with CNN's legal and notice of standards just to read their puerile crap. Suffice to say that I don't need CNN, I've seen all of the video there is, and without a doubt,

1. Good hit the gas with her wheels pointed straight at ICE, her front tires spun on ice for a moment before catching traction, and the ICE agent probably both saw and heard that.
2. The agent had to jump back away from the SUV. Even at that, he was still clipped and almost knocked backwards, throwing his aim high, probably why Good was hit in the head instead of the chest.
3. Since cops still can't read minds, he had every reason to presume she was aiming to hit him (though she probably didn't actually intend, thought she'd clear him turning, or at worst, "push" him out of the way, and so fired in self-defense).

Case closed. ***** is dead. The ICE officer will be acquitted.

And the Left will be enraged that THEY did not get to decide his guilt, don't even know who he was, or where he is or if still on duty. Ha Ha.

Police are trained to fire in short rapid bursts.

The 2nd and 3rd shots were probably just muscle memory and training kicking in.

Which is WHY you DON'T want them SHOOTING at YOU

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Would any reasonable person blow a persons head off in this circumstance? Was it a normal, reasonable response to being bumped? Would you have killed her?

yes.

 

[yidnar]

It’s bigoted to expect a lesbian to be accountable for her actions just like it’s racist for you to believe George Floyd placed himself in a bad situation.
Libs HATE accountablity, that shit is for white heterosexuals only.

when it comes to Floyd .. the officer should have reacted when he became unconscious .. instead he kept his knee on him .. did the cop kill him ? don't know ... but he supposedly had a lethal does of fentanyl in his body .. but the cop could have reacted better ..

 

[marvin martian]

None of that is her fault. Her being irritating for ICE doest warrant an execution. Explain shooting her through the side window twice as the car pulled away and he was safely to the side?

Remember, your first story was that she was only there "to drop off her kid at school". What happened to that lie?

 

[Mick2]

No one else stood in front of her vehicle.

No one else pulled their gun.

Attempted murder and/or complete disregard for human life doesn't require two victims. Where the hell did you pull that left-wing bullshit from?

Two of the bullets appear to have been fired upon her from the side of the vehicle, which I am sure the medical examiner will confirm.

We don't go by what left-wingers claimed "appear". If that were true Mike Brown would have been executed with hands up (instead of attacking the officer like he was actually doing) and Rittenhouse opened fire on a bunch of peaceful protestors (rather than rioters attacking him and trying to take his gun before he fired as was actually happened). We don't go by the claims of the shit in society. We go by the facts. The facts are on video.

We come armed with receipts. This hole was from a gun fired in firearm just feet away IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE as it was accelerating at the officer:

Left-wingers believe this bullet hole came from behind the car. Don't have shit for brains like the others.

When this ICE agent is cleared it will be viewed as biased administration and give further oxygen to the anti-ICE funders.

No one cares what you left-wingers claim you "view" stuff as. Haven't you figured this out already? The video evidence leaves zero doubt to those who aren't insane.

Someone else will have to determine if it was self defense or not, neither her or the ICE agent are rocket scientists as far as I am concerned.

No one claimed any party in this case are "rocket scientists". LOL. It's just an ICE age defending himself and others from a sick, insane woman as she was gunning her vehicle and hitting him.

I call balls and strikes.

Your "balls and strikes" are analogous to a 3-2 count, bases loaded, 2 out and then calling strike 3 on a ***** that bounced in front of the plate. You lost credibility.

You described what happened to the officer beginning at about the 39 second mark of the video below as a "tiny nudge". LOL



You'd be fired in the first inning of your "balls and strikes" call. Don't be a tool. You've got no credibility here on anything.

Your open border was the worst policy on earth and NEITHER party did a damn thing about it. I dont know how much more resentment politicians can show to their nations citizens than to allow millions of unvetted, unskilled, mostly idiots and many spies, terrorists, criminals and scammers into your country.

Blame Joe Biden and Democrats. Illegal border crossing are now less than 1/10th of what they were under that senile, anti-American bastard. We're cleaning up. And eliminating goons, like this one in Minnesota, is a start.

 

[Mac1958]

CNN couldn't help itself. Rather then say - just-havn'-fun-Renee drove toward the agent and struck him

Here is the video from a clear angle. At :09, she puts the car in drive, the wheels turn to the right.

You say the agent was "struck".

When, exactly?

 

[Mick2]

ICE policy generally prohibits officers from standing in front of moving vehicles. ehicles?

The vehicle wasn't "moving" when he walked in front of it, shit for brains. It was stationary and she accelerated it into him.

 

[Mick2]

You say the agent was "struck".

When, exactly?

Starts at about the 39 second mark of this video



You're welcome, winger. You just got your ass handed to you.

 

[Mac1958]

Starts at about the 39 second mark of this video



You're welcome, winger. You just got your ass handed to you.

How do you know if someone was hit?

Why did you avoid the clear video I provided?

Are you serious?

 

[Mick2]

Remember, your first story was that she was only there "to drop off her kid at school". What happened to that lie?

They've got some real whoppers and lies, don't they?

The bullet hole in the windshield came from behind.
She had no clue who the ICE officers were.
The ICE officer was never struck by the vehicle.
Her attempt to sit in her vehicle in the middle of the road to block ICE vehicles was a mere "minor parking violation".
The video taken by the officer hit by the vehicle was "fake".

Just to name a few.

 

[toobfreak]

Police are trained to fire in short rapid bursts.
The 2nd and 3rd shots were probably just muscle memory and training kicking in.
Which is WHY you DON'T want them SHOOTING at YOU

Exactly. The whole point to these people's jobs is to succeed. They are trained to shoot that way to INCREASE their odds that at least one of those shots will connect. They are not paid to miss. These idiots do not apparently understand who and what they are dealing with. To be honest, for days I have intended to actually commend the guy who shot Good for his ability to hit his target at the same time as trying to avoid getting run over and actually being hit, pushed, and his body turned around as he had to fire.

It is only ironic that had this lady not been such an ass, he probably would have hit her lower in the chest and she might have lived.

People--- just stay home and stay out of their way and let them and the many agencies over them all directing, watching, monitoring every little detail of their performance do what they are there to do, what every country has always done if it is to survive as a sovereign nation. If they are coming after you, they must have their reasons and you should be more focused on dealing with that rather than reading this post.

 

[Mick2]

How do you know if someone was hit?

What do you think that thud was when the officer's phone gets knocked back? Nicole Good shitting her pants? LOL

Don't be an gas-lighting stooge. The video evidence is irrefutable.

Why did you avoid the clear video I provided?

Your video wasn't "clear". The vehicle and another officer were in the way of a clear view. I agree that your view was inconclusive. If that's all we had I'd come to that conclusiong.

Fortunately, this is why we have now seen SEVERAL different angles and the non-mentally ill use all angles before reaching a conclusion. From the other side....and from in front. We see the officer being knocked back from the other side of the vehicle and we hear and audible thud and the officer's camera fly backwards from his POV video. You purposely omit those clear videos in deference to an obscured angle. This is what we call mental illness.

 

[Mac1958]

What do you think that thud was when the officer's phone gets knocked back? Nicole Good shitting her pants? LOL

Don't be an gas-lighting stooge. The video evidence is irrefutable.



Your video wasn't "clear". The vehicle and another officer were in the way of a clear view. I agree that your view was inconclusive. If that's all we had I'd come to that conclusiong.

Fortunately, this is why we have now seen SEVERAL different angles and the non-mentally ill use all angles before reaching a conclusion. From the other side....and from in front. We see the officer being knocked back from the other side of the vehicle and we hear and audible thud and the officer's camera fly backwards from his POV video. You purposely omit those clear videos in deference to an obscured angle. This is what we call mental illness.

Just to confirm:

You watched the video I provided, and you saw the shooter being hit.

Is that correct?

 

[buttercup]

This was probably already posted, but for anyone who hasn't seen it...everyone should watch this analysis.

From Grok:

Eric Balliet, the retired ICE agent featured in the CBS interview analyzing the Minneapolis shooting, has a robust background in federal law enforcement beyond just his retirement status.​

​

He served a full 25-year career as a federal agent, primarily with what is now known as ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and related Homeland Security components. In his later role, he most recently oversaw use-of-force investigations for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) — the investigative arm of ICE/DHS. This position involved reviewing and leading inquiries into incidents where agents applied force, giving him deep expertise in tactics, training standards, de-escalation, and policy compliance (e.g., when deadly force is or isn't justified, like during vehicle stops or fleeing scenarios).​

.....

 

[Mick2]

You watched the video I provided, and you saw the shooter being hit.

Is that correct?

No, from that angle the shooter was obscured by the vehicle and another officer. It was inconclusive. If that was the ONLY angle we had I'd agree that it was inconclusive. That is the difference between you and I. Between good and bad.

The angle from the other side of the vehicle, however, clearly shows the officer flying several back and the video from the officer shows his camera being knocked away with a clear audible thud.

Why are you not using the other angles and deferring to the single obscurred instead? MSDNC and the Communist News Network refuse to show them to you? LOL

Bet you still believe Mike Brown had his hands up and pleading for his life when he was shot, right? How many people did you maim and kill and how many buildings and businesses did you all torch during your riots based on that ******* lie?

Kooks will be kooks.

 

[Mac1958]

No, from that angle the shooter was obscured by the vehicle and another officer. It was inconclusive.

The angle from the other side of the vehicle shows the officer flying several back and the video from the officer shows his camera being knocked away with a clear audible thud.

Why are you not using the other angles and deferring to the single obscurred instead? MSDNC and the Communist News Network refuse to show them to you? LOL

Bet you still believe Mike Brown had his hands up and pleading for his life when he was shot, right?

Kooks will be kooks.

Okay. So you watched and video, and you're saying that you can't tell.

I believe you.